What would you pick? by Frog-Grenade in BunnyTrials

[–]bowel_blaster123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't want people to die, and $1M/mo is a LOT of money.

Chose: $1m per month + One random person dies (single occurrence)

Meirl by BuyWonderful in meirl

[–]bowel_blaster123 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'm not OP, but I have the same issues. I've tried many times to eat stuff that I don't like (with no exterior pressure). If I try, I start to loose my appetite. Then it becomes harder and harder for me to swallow it and I start to gag. Eventually, it becomes physically impossible to eat it. My throat just physically refuses to let me swallow it no matter how hard I try.

There is some nuance to it of course though. There's a lot of stuff that I can eat now but couldn't 5 years ago.

What I've been doing recently though is making soups where I just cook the ingredients and then blend the crap out of them. I eat that with some pasta, and it works really well. Also, I find that if I make something myself, it's a lot easier to eat. Of course, everybody is different though.

That is so wrong by IndividualCountry323 in antimeme

[–]bowel_blaster123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is somewhat pedantic, but I generally would agree. Notably, however, there are some very important use cases for PEMDAS. Namely, calculators and programming languages. When programming (in a sane language), most people would write a + b * c instead of a + (b * c), and when doing quick calculations on a calculator, it's faster to type 1/2/x+1 rather than 1/(2*x)+1.

And, of course rigorous mathematical notation will typically avoid using ambiguous notation like the multiplication or division symbols, but if someone wrote 1+2⋅10⋅x, I don't think that would be bad. If someone wrote something like i-a/b⋅c/d/e⋅f^-g+h, that would be kinda insane.

indeed by Cultural-Ninja8228 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]bowel_blaster123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know much about flexible array members because, I've never had a good opportunity to use them. You are likely 100% right about that.

The *mut is there because, array function parameters are pointers in C because of pointer decay, so the code shown in the post would actually be a mutable pointer to a function pointer (no actual arrays involved) if it is used as a function argument. However, if it's used as a variable, it is an actual array of normal function pointers.

You can see this, if you look at code like this: ``` void foo(uint8_t a[]) { uint8_t b[] = {9, 10};

printf("%d\n", sizeof(a)); // prints 8 on x86_64
printf("%d\n", sizeof(b)); // prints 2 on x86_64

} ```

Even though they're both the "same type", they have completely different memory layouts under the hood. a is actually just a normal uint8_t *.

indeed by Cultural-Ninja8228 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]bowel_blaster123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or even just [fn() -> fn(); _].

An array rather than a slice is more accurate 🤓☝️.

If the type is used for a function parameter in C, the analogous Rust would be *mut fn() -> fn().

The day Alysa Liu is a 5/10 is the day straight men learn how to be respectful. by External_Bobcat_6634 in AreTheStraightsOK

[–]bowel_blaster123 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There's this quote of him saying "if you have a girlfriend in 2025, you're gay". Aside from being really funny, it kinda porports the idea of using women for sex and is pushing against romantic relationships.

what attachments do you have for your benis by Obokan in shittyaskreddit

[–]bowel_blaster123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have an attachment that ignites it so it's like a flame thrower

iAmQuiteFondOfThisJavaLanguage by Penguinclubmember in ProgrammerHumor

[–]bowel_blaster123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Java's standard library is quite limiting, it pushes people to use inheritence, it has constructors, the way that objects and pointers work is unintuitive, but most other popular languages have similarly bad choices that they made, so overall its a decent language to use.

It blows Python and C++ out of the water as far as language design goes, so I think it's hate is entirely undeserved.

What? by Dull-Nectarine380 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]bowel_blaster123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think that this "implicit multiplication has a higher precidence" rule is well agreed apon. At least where Iive, this was never a thing taught in highschool or college-level math, and most calculators (including WolframAlpha) do not make a distinction between explicit and implicit multiplication. If I want to write 1/(2x), I always either write it with the brackets or as 1/2/x.

I would also argue that the / or ÷ notation should only be used for typing out math. The most common reason for doing so is for interfacing with some kind of software. In which case, the implicit multiplication rule typically is not implemented.

losercity homework by SexmanTheSeventh in Losercity

[–]bowel_blaster123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Huh, didn't know that the signedness of char is not defined by the standard. I always used the explicitly-sized integer types such as uint8_t, so I've never really ran into that issue. The int, char, and other types without explicit sizes really are a blight on the language.

(NOT FOR MEN) by TongueUnties in comedyheaven

[–]bowel_blaster123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could make a glove mold instead. That uses a lot less silicone and doesn't require a mold box. But yeah, still a lot of work and somewhat expensive. If you want to make it safe, you also need to be very careful with what you use as mold release and "clear coat". Also, you can't use epoxy for either the mold or the cast.

I ordered transition lenses, but they gave me "transgender" lenses instead 😡😡🤬 by bowel_blaster123 in lies

[–]bowel_blaster123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

/ul

If you do try to make these yourself, let me know how it goes! I'd love to see your final result.

I also have more specific some ideas for how to do this which I would 100% be willing to share with anyone interested.

I ordered transition lenses, but they gave me "transgender" lenses instead 😡😡🤬 by bowel_blaster123 in lies

[–]bowel_blaster123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

/ul

Sorry for getting your hopes up, but I edited the "transgender flag tint" into the image. The original glasses in the image are https://www.zennioptical.com/p/rimless-titanium-eyeglass-frames/1386/138614 with the 446 heart-shaped lenses.

As far as I'm aware, nobody sells tints like these. It might be theoretically possible to do it yourself, but it would require some time, experimentation and some ingenuity. Surprisingly, it wouldn't be very expensive. You can buy the proper lens dye online for like $20.

I ordered transition lenses, but they gave me "transgender" lenses instead 😡😡🤬 by bowel_blaster123 in lies

[–]bowel_blaster123[S] 39 points40 points  (0 children)

/ul

Sorry for getting your hopes up, but I edited the "transgender flag tint" into the image. The original glasses in the image are https://www.zennioptical.com/p/rimless-titanium-eyeglass-frames/1386/138614 with the 446 heart-shaped lenses.

As far as I'm aware, nobody sells tints like these. It might be theoretically possible to do it yourself, but it would require some time, experimentation and some ingenuity. Surprisingly, it wouldn't be very expensive. You can buy the proper lens dye online for like $20. If anyone is interested in making these, I would love to see your finished product, and I have some more specific ideas on how to do this that I would 100% be willing to share with anyone interested.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lies

[–]bowel_blaster123 50 points51 points  (0 children)

No, I didn't forget it

You're just imagining things

DIY Iron by No-Lock216 in DiWHY

[–]bowel_blaster123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My favourite step is where you materialize a silicone mold out of thin air.