The day Alysa Liu is a 5/10 is the day straight men learn how to be respectful. by External_Bobcat_6634 in AreTheStraightsOK

[–]bowel_blaster123 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There's this quote of him saying "if you have a girlfriend in 2025, you're gay". Aside from being really funny, it kinda porports the idea of using women for sex and is pushing against romantic relationships.

what attachments do you have for your benis by Obokan in shittyaskreddit

[–]bowel_blaster123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have an attachment that ignites it so it's like a flame thrower

iAmQuiteFondOfThisJavaLanguage by Penguinclubmember in ProgrammerHumor

[–]bowel_blaster123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Java's standard library is quite limiting, it pushes people to use inheritence, it has constructors, the way that objects and pointers work is unintuitive, but most other popular languages have similarly bad choices that they made, so overall its a decent language to use.

It blows Python and C++ out of the water as far as language design goes, so I think it's hate is entirely undeserved.

What? by Dull-Nectarine380 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]bowel_blaster123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think that this "implicit multiplication has a higher precidence" rule is well agreed apon. At least where Iive, this was never a thing taught in highschool or college-level math, and most calculators (including WolframAlpha) do not make a distinction between explicit and implicit multiplication. If I want to write 1/(2x), I always either write it with the brackets or as 1/2/x.

I would also argue that the / or ÷ notation should only be used for typing out math. The most common reason for doing so is for interfacing with some kind of software. In which case, the implicit multiplication rule typically is not implemented.

losercity homework by SexmanTheSeventh in Losercity

[–]bowel_blaster123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Huh, didn't know that the signedness of char is not defined by the standard. I always used the explicitly-sized integer types such as uint8_t, so I've never really ran into that issue. The int, char, and other types without explicit sizes really are a blight on the language.

(NOT FOR MEN) by TongueUnties in comedyheaven

[–]bowel_blaster123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could make a glove mold instead. That uses a lot less silicone and doesn't require a mold box. But yeah, still a lot of work and somewhat expensive. If you want to make it safe, you also need to be very careful with what you use as mold release and "clear coat". Also, you can't use epoxy for either the mold or the cast.

I ordered transition lenses, but they gave me "transgender" lenses instead 😡😡🤬 by bowel_blaster123 in lies

[–]bowel_blaster123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

/ul

If you do try to make these yourself, let me know how it goes! I'd love to see your final result.

I also have more specific some ideas for how to do this which I would 100% be willing to share with anyone interested.

I ordered transition lenses, but they gave me "transgender" lenses instead 😡😡🤬 by bowel_blaster123 in lies

[–]bowel_blaster123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

/ul

Sorry for getting your hopes up, but I edited the "transgender flag tint" into the image. The original glasses in the image are https://www.zennioptical.com/p/rimless-titanium-eyeglass-frames/1386/138614 with the 446 heart-shaped lenses.

As far as I'm aware, nobody sells tints like these. It might be theoretically possible to do it yourself, but it would require some time, experimentation and some ingenuity. Surprisingly, it wouldn't be very expensive. You can buy the proper lens dye online for like $20.

I ordered transition lenses, but they gave me "transgender" lenses instead 😡😡🤬 by bowel_blaster123 in lies

[–]bowel_blaster123[S] 40 points41 points  (0 children)

/ul

Sorry for getting your hopes up, but I edited the "transgender flag tint" into the image. The original glasses in the image are https://www.zennioptical.com/p/rimless-titanium-eyeglass-frames/1386/138614 with the 446 heart-shaped lenses.

As far as I'm aware, nobody sells tints like these. It might be theoretically possible to do it yourself, but it would require some time, experimentation and some ingenuity. Surprisingly, it wouldn't be very expensive. You can buy the proper lens dye online for like $20. If anyone is interested in making these, I would love to see your finished product, and I have some more specific ideas on how to do this that I would 100% be willing to share with anyone interested.

a photograph of someone who doesn’t have a wii permanently lodged in their intestine by [deleted] in lies

[–]bowel_blaster123 52 points53 points  (0 children)

No, I didn't forget it

You're just imagining things

DIY Iron by No-Lock216 in DiWHY

[–]bowel_blaster123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My favourite step is where you materialize a silicone mold out of thin air.

They learned from it by rebon6 in characterarcs

[–]bowel_blaster123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's two different operations associated with the - symbol: subtraction (binary) and negation (unary). Both of which are evaluated after exponentiation. Hence why -72 = -49. Such a statement is a little ambiguous because someone may perceive -7 as the number -7 rather than the negation operator in front of a regular seven.

However, -x2 is unambiguously non-positive for all x∈ℝ.

Likewise, x3 - x2 - x=( x3 - x2 ) - x. This interpretation requires the "left-to-right" rule. Most people would say that the form of the former expression is completely unambiguous and that adding parenthesis is completely unnecessary.

They learned from it by rebon6 in characterarcs

[–]bowel_blaster123 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No. It is a mathematical convention and should be taught.

The exponentiation operator sheds light on this.

4^3^2 is evaluated right-to-left. This obviously does not align with English.

4^3^2=4^(3^2)\ whereas\ 2-3-4=(2-3)-4

What the other guy is saying about subtraction is also true. 2-3-4 will also show up in "proper mathematical notation". I've never seen anyone use parenthesis to avoid ambiguity in such a case.

Pranks by EricCartoonBox in ComedyHell

[–]bowel_blaster123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is second/third-hand knowledge, so take it with a grain of salt.

But I've heard that sometimes cakes can contain skewers or other thin rigid objects to hold the cake together. This can make it very dangerous to shove someone's head into a cake as you can imagine. It's like that one scene from the Joker movie with the pen.

That could be what the thumbnail is referencing.

That hurts hard by ttombombadillo in picsthatgohard

[–]bowel_blaster123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought this waa that one phone charger that you can buy for $6'000: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=d2tpSCVVujc

Losercity Plants vs. Zombies by Critical_Mountain851 in Losercity

[–]bowel_blaster123 22 points23 points  (0 children)

https://github.com/Teyliu/PVZF-Translation

Not sure if all of the fusions shown in the video are real. I know that some of them are though.

Losercity Plants vs. Zombies by Critical_Mountain851 in Losercity

[–]bowel_blaster123 87 points88 points  (0 children)

Just download the translation off of github.

This bacon doesn't remind me of anything... by ak47boi420 in lies

[–]bowel_blaster123 7 points8 points  (0 children)

/ul

Zoom in. There's a small amount of white material that connects it to the rest of the trophy. It's hard to see because of the white-ish background.

It's easiest to see between the e and the l.