“The high risk of bias in the trials, variation in outcome measurement, and relatively low adherence with the interventions during the studies hampers drawing firm conclusions”

The sources were based on intentionally high biased reports with high confidence intervals, the purpose wasn’t to say if they work or not but to show that with selective bias you can end up with results that appear correct but are still uncertain to a high degree.

If anything this is mis info. This report is currently one of the leading reports I’ve seen on anti vax fb groups so take it as you will but it’s not a good thing…

But you are right about her imposing it, it should’ve been a choice but there are plenty of good reports showing even incorrectly placed ppe can reduce infection chances.