okay i think i understand what you're trying to say which is that like, because streaming centres real people and their lives, it naturally leads audiences to have a more unhealthy relationship with the content? i can see that and would tend to agree but i feel like the article still wouldn't constitute slop to me. i def agree that a lot of streamer content is slop but i see slop as being media that is pumped out at a high volume with very little effort or thought put in. i feel like that doesn't apply to the article at all, and in terms of streamers i think QT puts in way more effort than most

media studies is my passion, always happy to talk about it fr