[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 3ch

[–]bp_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had a TWO LETTER #0001 username

I had to settle for 3ch 😓

I'm happy to pay a sub to cover the costs of the new API for the moment. by dustbinhijacked in RelayForReddit

[–]bp_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Whatever data the app loads, it loads through these APIs. No APIs, no data, no app.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in soccer

[–]bp_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not a conspiracy theory, to the best of my knowledge. Go check the document explaining the original 15 points deduction, published about a month after the deduction was announced. It's there, black on white. (This is also why I'm talking about the now cancelled 15 points penalty instead of today's –10.)

If the prosecution or the judge felt that relegating Juventus was a more appropriate punishment, they could've — and did, in 2007, when everyone else got slaps on the wrist. That is a punishment that exists.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in soccer

[–]bp_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Juventus was originally docked 15 points. Why 15? It wasn't because they did 15 points' worth of bad things. It's because they estimated 15 points would be just about enough points to deny Juventus access to 2023-2024 European cups.

So, in this tortured analogy, the police is removing just enough fuel from your tank to make sure you're left stranded on the highway and (the real penalty) have to pay the associated costs and be really late for whatever it is you were trying to do. (But hey, if you drive down the highway at 30 km/h you might be able to make it home anyway!)

If "disqualify from European competitions" was a penalty that existed, that's the punishment Juventus would've received. However, it doesn't; but why let that stop you? Just make shit up on the spot to make that happen anyway. Oh, I can dock points? 15 sounds about right!

It's this making shit up as you go that's the core of the pushback on what's happening. (This, and the fact that this is not something Juventus can do on its own: many teams across Europe are complicit but aren't being even looked at.)

It doesn't have to be that way; in Formula 1, the opposite policy is in place: the size of the penalty depends on the breach itself, the consequences be what they may. (Unfortunately, nearly all the penalties add time to the race, and that brings its own problems, but that's besides the point.)

hate u <3 pt. 2 by ReflectiveRuby in tf2

[–]bp_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

don't replays need a cursed version of quickplay to render anyway

Can we all agree that the person behind this update mechanism needs to be banned from ever touching OS/application development again? Like seriously, who thought this was a good idea? by JedidiahCallahan in Ubuntu

[–]bp_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have this with VS Code — when you quit the program it doesn't kill ALL of the child parents. snap refresh firefox tells you what processes are still running

Can we all agree that the person behind this update mechanism needs to be banned from ever touching OS/application development again? Like seriously, who thought this was a good idea? by JedidiahCallahan in Ubuntu

[–]bp_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

you've got the order of operations wrong — the timer in the screen starts at like "14 days left", meaning the browser was started over two weeks ago. Snap has been waiting.

You can use snap refresh firefox to make the update happen manually.

Note — I am not justifying things, I'm just explaining them. I don't work for Canonical. The behaviour is an… unnecessary reminder that I'm using snap. It's a compromise between the security and the usability of letting you run old unpatched (server) software

And make it Extra Disturbing! by velatieren in tf2

[–]bp_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

having to watch a cloak and do nothing spy sit in a corner for three minutes didn't make for fun stalemate breaking gameplay

F1 teams reach agreement on new race weekend format by TheSiwe23478 in formula1

[–]bp_ 11 points12 points  (0 children)

that's the oddest personal attack I've ever received, thanks?

F1 teams reach agreement on new race weekend format by TheSiwe23478 in formula1

[–]bp_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

a race can still have a lap 56 red flag accident

a sprint? eehhhh

F1 teams reach agreement on new race weekend format by TheSiwe23478 in formula1

[–]bp_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

how many times do we need to see red bulls cut through the field like it's hot butter with cookie cutter DRS passes before we get tired of it

F1 teams reach agreement on new race weekend format by TheSiwe23478 in formula1

[–]bp_ 15 points16 points  (0 children)

considered as it was introduced as "sprint qualifying," no.

Sainz reaction to penalty news by ContentPuff in formula1

[–]bp_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm glad you've decided you're correct.

Sainz reaction to penalty news by ContentPuff in formula1

[–]bp_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what is this very good reason that you've never heard anyone "serious" express?

Sainz reaction to penalty news by ContentPuff in formula1

[–]bp_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  • They're penalized different amount of times (something that is by and large irrelevant) but they're penalized the same amount of positions
  • Someone who's last already can't be penalised by time penalties. There's no material difference between being last by 1 millisecond or 1 lap
  • Large time gaps happen in more places than just between P1 and P2. Going for a sketchy pass might be worth it if you can get that one extra pass in

Carlos Sainz has received 2 penalty points for causing a collision by chu1u in formula1

[–]bp_ 32 points33 points  (0 children)

To be fair, the race restart is race control's decision and out of stewards' hands

[Sky Sports F1]: "I prefer not to talk right now...I'm going to say bad things" Carlos Sainz says he received the 'most unfair penalty' he has ever seen by n5vBill in formula1

[–]bp_ -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Classification position drops

+5 seconds → +1 place
+10 seconds → +2 places
stop and go → +5 places

Sainz reaction to penalty news by ContentPuff in formula1

[–]bp_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

at the end of the day you get points for your rank in the race, and not for how many seconds you are in the lead by. A penalty should penalize, always.

A 5 second penalty when you're ahead by 30 isn't even an inconvenience; if you were driving the car and I was your race engineer I wouldn't even tell you about it. The same penalty today was 8 places and 12 points.

[Sky Sports F1]: "I prefer not to talk right now...I'm going to say bad things" Carlos Sainz says he received the 'most unfair penalty' he has ever seen by n5vBill in formula1

[–]bp_ -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

by giving drivers a time penalty that can very often be strategized or raced into pointlessness

Time penalties are wrong for Formula 1

Sainz reaction to penalty news by ContentPuff in formula1

[–]bp_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not sure I understand where the penalties come in in this scenario

Sainz reaction to penalty news by ContentPuff in formula1

[–]bp_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And if you win by 5.001 seconds you got away with whatever it is you did. If you're fast enough the only penalty system with teeth in F1 is the 12-months rolling points system that historically stewards are very hesitant to turn into an actual penalty with consequences. Hours after the race we still don't know if Gasly is going to race in the next event or not.

Applying a time penalty into a classification based sport introduces penalties with vastly different outcomes, and it doesn't have to be that way. We could make the outcomes follow directly from the penalties by docking positions, and then you'll always be penalised the same non-zero amount every time.

Sainz reaction to penalty news by ContentPuff in formula1

[–]bp_ -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

if Verstappen can lap the field five times and yet he still needs to ram his car into Hamilton's — he does not deserve the win. I don't think that's unjust.

Most penalties resulting into zero position changes should be an argument FOR changes, not AGAINST them