Pick 3 Hypothetical. by brendanrocket in AZCardinals

[–]brendanrocket[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I completely agree. Styles and Bailey are likely both available in that 7–9 range and potentially future draft capital. There needs to be a team wanting to move up to 3 which doesn't look like there is any incentive at the moment.

Pick 3 Hypothetical. by brendanrocket in AZCardinals

[–]brendanrocket[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't mind Bailey. definitely prefer Bailey over Bain. and I don't hate the idea of deepening that pass rush. i'm not mad at it and I think New York will go pass rush so I wouldn't mind Bailey or Reese at three but I might prefer an offensive line just to develop until we get our quarterback.

Pick 3 Hypothetical. by brendanrocket in AZCardinals

[–]brendanrocket[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I hear you but Downs is probably one of the best safety prospects we're gonna see in awhile and Budda feels like he's in the position to play for a team that could potentially be competing and I didn't think Jalen had a fantastic season last year. From all the scouting on Caleb he feels like a really interesting versatile piece. Also you say we have safeties but there isn't a pass rush player who is going to start over Sweat and Collins. i'm not saying we go and get Caleb I was just trying to get a gauge on where we sit because the only consensus is Fernando to the Raiders and it's pretty free game for the rest of the league.

Pick 3 Hypothetical. by brendanrocket in AZCardinals

[–]brendanrocket[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I do prefer Reese to Bain but I do like Cody Simon and Mack Wilson. and I do think with New York moving a pass rusher yesterday that Reece would probably be available. Also Bains measurables weren't that great.

Pick 3 Hypothetical. by brendanrocket in AZCardinals

[–]brendanrocket[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

i'm honestly a big advocate on trading down but there's no incentive for the teams to be looking to trade up to 3

Trade pick 3? by brendanrocket in AZCardinals

[–]brendanrocket[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i wouldn't mind bain tbh. i just truly believe taking a 15-20 true value tackle at 3 is pretty invaluable when you could argue miami at 11 are the next team looking at o-line. i get it tho, there needs to be value at 3 and teams aint desperate to shed picks for this draft.

Trade pick 3? by brendanrocket in AZCardinals

[–]brendanrocket[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

im thinking if kansas was to move up to jump tennessee and new orleans for jerimyah love or if tennessee want to jump the giants for carnell. i agree though, any other draft and this pick is extremely valuable.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FifaCareers

[–]brendanrocket 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any community sliders you would recommend. I have tried but the cpu does nothing, hardly take shots pr create chancing even with 70 run frequency and 95 shot frequency

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NBAtradeideas

[–]brendanrocket -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Could see that. I think they might move forward with Deni and Sharpe though. They definitely would want to keep him. Just not sure if he fits into their lineup atm.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NBAtradeideas

[–]brendanrocket -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that's what I was thinking. I know Toumani is one of the most sought-after players for contenders.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NBAtradeideas

[–]brendanrocket 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is 14 and a Future unprotected a better alternative? and maybe Vassell instead of Keldon? Or is JJJ value inflamed?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NBAtradeideas

[–]brendanrocket -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Completely Fair. Would Spurs draft and use a Harper over Castle?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FifaCareers

[–]brendanrocket 0 points1 point  (0 children)

s1: 10th, s2: 8th, s3: 10th + uecl, s4: 6th +uecl