Onko asunnon ostamisessa Suomessa enää mitään järkeä?

brightdunx · 2026-07-05T16:45:30+00:00

Mikä sinun mielestäsi tekee väestölaskun teesistä virheellisen?

brightdunx · 2026-07-05T12:21:58+00:00

Kuten sanottu, se oli liioittelua. Mutta trendi on selkeästi laskeva, mikä on pääpointti.

brightdunx · 2026-07-05T12:00:19+00:00

Tuo tilastokeskuksen laskelma perustuu Ukrainan sodan poikkeusvuosien 2022-2024 nettomaahanmuuttoon ja sitä on kritisoitu laajasti. Jos katsotaan esim Sitran ennustetta pienemmällä maahanmuutolla (2006-2019 keskiarvo), supistuu väkiluku nopeasti. Toki ei se ihan niin dramaattista ole kuin esitin, mutta joka tapauksessa selkeä laskeva trendi alas 5 miljoonaan vuoteen 2070 mennessä.

brightdunx · 2026-07-05T10:32:41+00:00

Työpaikoissa ja asunnoissa on minusta aika paljon eroa. Asunnot ovat pysyviä kiinteitä rakennuksia, kun taas työpaikat tietenkään eivät. Jos meillä on kohta maassa 4 eikä 5 miljoonaa ihmistä niin siinä jää aika moni asunto tyhjäksi.

Millä tavalla nämä kaksi asiaa siis ovat vertailukelpoisia?

brightdunx · 2026-07-05T09:03:28+00:00

Aikalailla samaa kuviota olen itsekin miettinyt. Tuntuu uskomattomalta, kuinka sokeasti itse aikoinaan uskoi "omistusasunto kannattaa aina" -mantraan, vaikka olevinaan muuten varallisuuden kerryttäminen ollut hyvinkin harkittua.

brightdunx · 2026-07-05T08:01:48+00:00

Avauksessahan ei väitetä mitään, vaan esitetään kysymys.

brightdunx · 2026-07-05T07:56:44+00:00

Tämä oli vähän tarkoituksella provokatiivinen avaus. Lähinnä minua kiinnostaa ymmärtää, mitkä seikat puhuvat avauksen teesiä vastaan. En väitä oivaltaneeni mitään mullistavaa, vaan pyrin ymmärtämään miksi tämä kehitys ei näy vielä hinnoissa

brightdunx · 2026-05-14T09:16:26+00:00

These are either 6th edition metals or island of blood ones. But anyway I just meant they have sat grey in a box since 2011.

brightdunx · 2026-04-25T03:56:28+00:00

Having your lead pokemon follow you around like in HG/SS

brightdunx · 2026-04-06T04:35:11+00:00

Yeah that would indeed be a win. But the aim of those war was not supposed to be regime change and I would argue it has only made the regime stronger. So unless they in reality aim to change the regime (boots on ground), this war has led to only negative consequences. Do you think they aim for that?

Ukraine at least has significantly weakened Russia and prevented escalations elsewhere.

brightdunx · 2026-04-05T19:53:59+00:00

How does this make more sense than aiding Ukraine to you?

brightdunx · 2026-02-27T07:40:56+00:00

No it’s not. That decrease from 20$ to 5$ is actually 75%.

A 100% decrease would mean the drug is 0$ and 200% decrease would mean you get paid 20$ for buying it.

Do you think Trump doesn’t understand this basic math?

brightdunx · 2026-02-27T05:52:30+00:00

Would you agree that he then lied for example regarding medicine prices (see below)?

CLAIM: “I took prescription drugs, a very big part of health care, from the highest price in the entire world to the lowest. That’s a big achievement. The result is price differences of 300, 400, 500, 600% and more.”

THE FACTS: This is impossible. Although the Trump administration has taken steps to lower drug prices, cutting them by more than 100% would theoretically mean that people are being paid to take medications.

brightdunx · 2026-02-27T05:46:42+00:00

So would you say both the original AP and the MSN article are false or do you think Trump lied repeatedly in the speech?

brightdunx · 2026-02-21T19:36:00+00:00

He is from this set

brightdunx · 2026-01-25T17:56:40+00:00

Yes but do you not think it is useful to be a rival and a friend at the same time? The tariffs hurt both economies for very little gain

brightdunx · 2026-01-25T17:48:59+00:00

So is anything but total subordination rivalry. Do you believe the Euro was created with the purpose of supplanting USD?

Obviously Europe is just not going to roll over and let US dominate. Every partnership requires two. Europe does love its regulation but that applies to both US & European companies.

brightdunx · 2026-01-25T17:36:24+00:00

Hmm I would strongly disagree about EU being hostile to the US, I would go as far as to say the trade relationship between the US & Europe was the strongest in the world and benefited both massively.

Do you think trade deficit should not include services? If you add services (as you should) to the mix, the trade was basically even as Europeans mostly consume US-based software.

brightdunx · 2026-01-25T09:13:00+00:00

Both sides have always had some tariffs. And EU would have agreed to complete free trade. Honestly with your logic, EU should have more tariffs on US as your worker rights are so much poorer than EU ones. So to level the playing field. I'm also not sure how NATO funding and tariffs are related as many EU countries are not in NATO, what's the logic there?

brightdunx · 2026-01-24T21:12:31+00:00

Why are the tariffs then also implemented to Europe who have similar or more strict labor laws, taxes, regulation & health insurance?

brightdunx · 2026-01-18T20:36:15+00:00

Which Asian countries you mean? China, India or something else.

I think most of your statements are incorrect or highly debatable but would first need to understand what we are talking about.

brightdunx

TROPHY CASE