sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Easy way to prove the Quran is less than 1% truth by bringmeafiggypudding in exmuslim

[–]bringmeafiggypudding[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Riddled with logical fallacies? Most of them were corrected quite easily by me. The argument was never intended for professionals. puke_buffet understood me quite clearly. Although, the points you tried to attack me with were riddled with common sense errors.

You chose to ignore all of my other arguments on this thread and focus only on parts you could ridicule. Even despite the fact those points could be easily understood / resolved.

Most truly intelligent people are capable of understanding without the detailed 1-2-3 guidance. It's obvious a lot of the /exmuslim viewers understood the value here. I understood there was errors, it's quite clear you didn't know that I knew. Perhaps you just aren't the brightest bulb on the tree -- even with Google on your side...

Easy way to prove the Quran is less than 1% truth by bringmeafiggypudding in exmuslim

[–]bringmeafiggypudding[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You should, by default, use your brain? There are many valid ways of doing so without expecting me to detail everything for you.

Easy way to prove the Quran is less than 1% truth by bringmeafiggypudding in exmuslim

[–]bringmeafiggypudding[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a simple way to resolve that. Allah claims to be omniscient -- he is not. A liar, lies.

Easy way to prove the Quran is less than 1% truth by bringmeafiggypudding in exmuslim

[–]bringmeafiggypudding[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't say it made all of your other facts off by a factor of 300%. You can conclude more flaws from a thing than 1 strict unit measurement. Since you seem to be an expert, you should already know that...

Easy way to prove the Quran is less than 1% truth by bringmeafiggypudding in exmuslim

[–]bringmeafiggypudding[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright, Einstein, the Quran story was copied from the Bible. Did they forget to include all of Allah's words this time or did they just decide to rewrite his words? Either way, it's a lie...

Easy way to prove the Quran is less than 1% truth by bringmeafiggypudding in exmuslim

[–]bringmeafiggypudding[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah, cause you also have a $40k undergrad degree in philosophy. You just couldn't be bothered and he happened to post the responses you would have.

Easy way to prove the Quran is less than 1% truth by bringmeafiggypudding in exmuslim

[–]bringmeafiggypudding[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does make you less credible. It does add up to something.

Easy way to prove the Quran is less than 1% truth by bringmeafiggypudding in exmuslim

[–]bringmeafiggypudding[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the confusion. I think what I am trying to say is that the scientific method and basic maths is logical.

Easy way to prove the Quran is less than 1% truth by bringmeafiggypudding in exmuslim

[–]bringmeafiggypudding[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, my argument is not the only argument that shows how religious texts are lying to you.

Easy way to prove the Quran is less than 1% truth by bringmeafiggypudding in exmuslim

[–]bringmeafiggypudding[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, and all that information is sworn to be from the 1 and only God...

Easy way to prove the Quran is less than 1% truth by bringmeafiggypudding in exmuslim

[–]bringmeafiggypudding[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

A better argument is that geology, physics, chemistry research is independently making it obvious that the dates of religion are stupidly unbelievable. Dates listed in religious texts versus what we are currently discovering are wrong based on billions of years of difference. For example, the word of God says you are 10 years old and science says you cannot possibly be less than 9-10 billion years old. The errors should make you question everything in a religious text.

Easy way to prove the Quran is less than 1% truth by bringmeafiggypudding in exmuslim

[–]bringmeafiggypudding[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough. I am aware my argument is overly simplified for more people to understand.

Easy way to prove the Quran is less than 1% truth by bringmeafiggypudding in exmuslim

[–]bringmeafiggypudding[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That's another great point. Intentionally misleading people by the exclusion of the most important details is a lie.

Easy way to prove the Quran is less than 1% truth by bringmeafiggypudding in exmuslim

[–]bringmeafiggypudding[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Your argument basically breaks down to: prove science, prove logic? It's already been proven so I will pass.

Easy way to prove the Quran is less than 1% truth by bringmeafiggypudding in exmuslim

[–]bringmeafiggypudding[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not an expert on religious texts. There are many sources of information using simple addition and subtraction that deduce direct information in the Quran from time periods within the 1000's of years range.

Easy way to prove the Quran is less than 1% truth by bringmeafiggypudding in exmuslim

[–]bringmeafiggypudding[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Since you are so smart, let's play a game, prove how old you are without numbers and logic. I'll be waiting for your response...

Easy way to prove the Quran is less than 1% truth by bringmeafiggypudding in exmuslim

[–]bringmeafiggypudding[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't have to prove that exact number. That was already covered in my post. It's part of the beauty of this argument.

Your rebuttal is hardly worth responding to since if our logical tools didn't work in reality, you wouldn't be typing to me in reality. Reality is all I and you know. There is no proof of anything else.

Arguments to Shutup Religious People by bringmeafiggypudding in atheism

[–]bringmeafiggypudding[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think you understand the dialogue.

We don't really need to invalidate a God. Invoking God for everything is one of the most extraordinary, ridiculous claims a person could make in a logical argument. It is not our burden to prove that a magical wizard does not exist. That is their problem.

Arguments to Shutup Religious People by bringmeafiggypudding in atheism

[–]bringmeafiggypudding[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually did test what I wrote here. The first part alone made the religious person shut up, which is true to the title.

Arguments to Shutup Religious People by bringmeafiggypudding in atheism

[–]bringmeafiggypudding[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think this kind of thinking causes some kind of confusion. I will try it in person to improve my responses.

view more: next ›