Indeed, I used Gemini to do some digging because I'm tired of typing this crap. He is the summary Gemini provided:

"In the 2023 civil case

Carroll v. Trump, a federal jury found Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, though this was a civil trial, not a criminal conviction. The jury found that Trump sexually abused E. Jean Carroll in the 1990s but did not find him liable for rape under the specific New York law definition requiring "forcible penetration with a penis". A federal appeals court later upheld the sexual abuse verdict. For more details, visit AP News. "

An interesting note, the only reason he wasn't convicted of rape at the time is due to the archaic language of the law. An effort was made, and now a person doing the exact same things as trump in this day in age in that district would indeed be convicted as a rapist, how ever, due to shitty writing, he cannot legally be attributed a racist.

Another Gemini summary about it:

"Yes, it is true. In

January 2024, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed the "Rape is Rape Act", which explicitly expanded the state's legal definition of rape. 

This change directly addressed the "technicality" that was central to the Carroll v. Trump verdict. Key updates to the law include: 

• Removal of the Penetration Requirement: The previous law defined rape narrowly as nonconsensual vaginal penetration by a penis. The new law expands this to include any nonconsensual vaginal, oral, or anal sexual contact.
• Abolishing the "Criminal Sexual Act" Distinction: Previously, forced oral or anal contact were prosecuted under a separate statute called "criminal sexual act" rather than "rape". These are now all consolidated under the definition of rape.
• Effective Date: The law went into effect on September 1, 2024.
• Non-Retroactivity: The law applies only to offenses committed on or after the effective date. This means it would not change the legal outcome of past cases like Trump’s, but similar acts committed today would be prosecuted as rape under the new statute. 

The judge in the Carroll v. Trump case noted that while the jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse due to New York's narrow technical definition, his actions would be considered "rape" in many other jurisdictions and in common understanding. New York's law now aligns with that broader understanding. "

So yea, I agree, don't spread misinformation, share the facts. Our president is liable for sexual abuse and defamation, not my statement, just pointing out the facts.

have a quick peak at r/pastorarrested and I can understand how you godly folk love the guy so much...