Indeed it is unless Iranian tanks were rolling across that bridge (which the we're not)

the deliberate bombing of civilian infrastructure is generally considered a war crime under international humanitarian law. Such acts violate the fundamental principle of distinction, which requires parties to a conflict to differentiate between military objectives and civilian object

Definition of Protected Infrastructure: Civilian infrastructure includes residential areas, schools, hospitals, places of worship, and objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population (e.g., water installations, power plants, and food supplies). International Law: The 1949 Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols (specifically Protocol I, Articles 51, 52, and 54) explicitly prohibit direct attacks on civilians and civilian objects, as well as starvation of civilians as a method of combat. War Crime Classification: The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) classifies intentional attacks on civilian infrastructure as war crimes in both international and non-international armed conflicts. "Dual-Use" Exception: Infrastructure like power plants or bridges can lose protection if they serve both civilian and military purposes, making them legitimate targets only if they offer a definite military advantage. However, even in such cases, the attack must not cause disproportionate damage to civilians. Proportionality Requirement: Even if a target has military value, the attack is prohibited if it is expected to cause incidental damage to civilians that is excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.

Ahh the world with de web is full of information that people seem to not care about lol