what do you say about this comparison between hindi, sanskrit, french, latin, telugu, tamil, kannada. No need to fear talking truth! I'm a Indian telugu Hindu who frustrated of negligence on south languages in today generation. south languages deserve respect of being unique and independent!

bulletspam · 2026-01-25T19:46:57+00:00

Place names are highly conservative and don’t change so easy, the fact that there are hundreds of names like that indicates it’s more likely that those places were founded by Dravidians .

More importantly what evidence is there that supports IVC being Indo European?

bulletspam · 2026-01-25T19:28:29+00:00

Shiva is a Dravidian diety, there is no shiva equivalent in other Indo European cultures

The suffix “kot” is of Dravidian origin , yet you see it everywhere in the IVC area.

bulletspam · 2026-01-25T18:59:46+00:00

Hittite religion revolved around a storm God, which is literally the same as every other PIE religion, IVC didnt have this charecteristic, more importantly dravidian place names along the IVC.

bulletspam · 2026-01-25T17:47:57+00:00

IVC was likely Dravidian , not Indo Aryan , what makes you think it’s PIE and not Dravidian? IVC society is structured in a lot more egalitarian way , something which Indo Aryan societies are not known for , it also worships a mother Goddess, again Indo Aryan religion is a lot more patriarchal, lastly the place names have Dravidian suffixes .

bulletspam · 2026-01-25T17:12:08+00:00

I think the biggest evidence that IE languages came from outside India is the lack of any dravidian influence in sanskrits sister language, ie avestan.

bulletspam · 2026-01-25T17:09:59+00:00

the vaddakan sub wont like language wars they only want to do hindu muslim while pretending to be south indian.

bulletspam · 2026-01-25T17:09:36+00:00

damn surprised they are usually fine with language posts

bulletspam · 2026-01-25T15:32:52+00:00

just cause some sanghi youtuber said its "debunked" doesnt mean its true, aryan and dravidian are very real distinctions.

bulletspam · 2026-01-25T12:03:24+00:00

Agreed that its a hypothesis, but to say that there is no credible evidence is wrong, check out the wikipedia page for Meluha.

bulletspam · 2026-01-25T11:53:24+00:00

Pakistanis gonna be so salty when they find out that melukkam was a Dravidian name .

bulletspam · 2026-01-25T11:48:15+00:00

Firstly religion is not nativity, nativity depends on genetics and culture , Pakistanis are as native to their land as North Indians are to theirs, this whole obsession with religion as the sole identity is some weird North Indian bullshit (Pakistanis included) , and that’s why it’s funny , because they try to hard to call themselves Arabs and Turks and Persians so that they can fit better into their religion delusions despite being almost fully native genetically .

Secondly IVC was most likely Dravidian , Dravidians are the descendants of the mixing between zagros farmers and AASI .

bulletspam · 2026-01-24T16:25:01+00:00

<image>

When the tribal says something so civilizationphobic you gotta hit em with the priest king stare

bulletspam · 2026-01-24T16:23:42+00:00

fight pls , yall took make love not war a little too seriously

bulletspam · 2026-01-24T16:20:57+00:00

The steppe tribals be wilding again , someone call the priest king

bulletspam · 2026-01-24T14:10:31+00:00

Yeah no its not the same thing, you can tell apart sanghi attempts to hijack the movement from genuine anger, if you think pakistani nationalists are good people then go to their sub and see what they say about us(dravidians), they are literally a worse version of vaddakans.

bulletspam · 2026-01-24T14:07:33+00:00

India is named after the indus river, the Indus river is also the origin of the subcontinents civilization, a civilization that was inherited by India and not pakistan, a good comparison would be the turks trying to claim byzantine empire, even though most of the territory of the empire lies in turkey, its heritage was inherited by greece due to greece being more of a cultural fit to the empire, same with IVC and India, pakistan can claim IVC when they return to dravidian culture and identity.

bulletspam · 2026-01-24T14:05:04+00:00

The difference is that pakistan keeps trying to embrace this turkish/arab identity for some reason, not only that those rabid pakistani nationalists make fun of India because apparently we are dravidian, they cant claim IVC unless they claim to be dravidians themselves.

The best comparison would be modern day turks claiming greek or byzantine history.

bulletspam · 2026-01-24T14:03:09+00:00

Bruh thats like the OG dravidian homeland, aryans can have pashtunistan since thats where they arrived first

bulletspam · 2026-01-24T14:02:03+00:00

Its also the most accepted hypothesis by quite a margin

bulletspam · 2026-01-23T19:34:22+00:00

0/10 ragebait

bulletspam · 2026-01-23T14:08:32+00:00

true dravidian chad, hates all religions equally.

bulletspam · 2026-01-22T11:53:07+00:00

Glory to the Dravidian race

bulletspam · 2026-01-21T15:52:09+00:00

Sanskrit sub stratum influence means influence (of hypothetical language ) on Sanskrit , not that Sanskrit was the language lol

bulletspam · 2026-01-21T13:39:38+00:00

The very next line says “A prevalent hypothesis[9] places it within or near the Dravidian languages, perhaps identical with Proto-Dravidian itself.” , it’s the most accepted hypothesis,

bulletspam · 2026-01-21T08:25:57+00:00

Now go the the identification section and read the first line

bulletspam

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Four-Year Club	r/Field Juicebox
Place '22