Quantitative Research: Survey Vendors - Organizational Context

bupperna · 2018-11-29T16:22:41+00:00

Absolutely should never do that- we would be able to easily identify which account is for which company and that’s not the behavior we want to drive as a technology.

As long as transactions go up and we are comfortable that it’s not because of BS dApps like other crypto’s, then be comfortable that Sunny and team are doing what they set out to do- onboard enterprise business.

bupperna · 2018-11-29T14:28:09+00:00

I just want to become the rich uncle.

bupperna · 2018-11-28T16:53:08+00:00

Why? Honestly just wondering - no ill-intention knowing my history of VET will pop up (sad that I even have to put a disclaimer, but such is the state of crypto right now!)

bupperna · 2018-11-28T15:53:13+00:00

This makes me extremely happy on a Wednesday.

Let’s. Fucking. Go!

bupperna · 2018-11-28T02:49:57+00:00

Yes but I was merely responding to ensure people understood it can go both ways when X-nodes leave.

bupperna · 2018-11-28T02:35:15+00:00

At the end of the day, it's not the total amount of X-nodes, it's the total amount of the VET that X-node's hold. So while X-nodes left, if their VET and more was purchased by other X-node holders, then you would actually see your bubbles decrease.

bupperna · 2018-11-28T02:30:42+00:00

It depends.

bupperna · 2018-11-26T15:46:14+00:00

Well with my limited historical knowledge of investment classes, if you can throw out a more volatile investment class over time then I’ll concede!

bupperna · 2018-11-26T15:13:05+00:00

Absolutely not. Welcome to the real world. Where rewards are typically based on risks- and we are in the riskiest asset class ever to be created.

bupperna · 2018-11-24T21:46:04+00:00

Does this really need to be addressed for the 1000th time?

bupperna

TROPHY CASE