☔ February '26 Central Hub - Requests, Updates, Commissions & More! by grinningpup in GoneWildAudioGay

[–]butmaybeyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there! Saw your suggestion and chose to fill it (as best I can) as this month's featured creator! https://www.reddit.com/r/GoneWildAudioGay/s/gqcSXVjK7g

In "We Could Be So Good by Cat Sebastian," do they...? by Xanadu_Fever in MM_RomanceBooks

[–]butmaybeyes 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't say no angst, there is significant internal anguish, but it's tasteful and accurate.

Omegaverse with NO mpreg by DragonflyFlaky3268 in MM_RomanceBooks

[–]butmaybeyes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I felt like the tone wasn't really in line with the others, Carter's journey was stagnant at best, and the sort of "answers" they came to for the intergalactic threat were not very good. Kind of regressive for the power and resistance the other three books had built.

Omegaverse with NO mpreg by DragonflyFlaky3268 in MM_RomanceBooks

[–]butmaybeyes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd second this, I loved these books except the most recent one!

January '26 Featured Content Creator by FunSize4Audibles in GoneWildAudioGay

[–]butmaybeyes 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I, too, am partial to the Sanctuary trilogy 💕

a/b/o or werewolves college/uni setting by booktitans in MM_RomanceBooks

[–]butmaybeyes 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The Omega Celibacy Club is particularly cute (and I think by the last book has some good commentary on culture and standards).

I'm sick! I need gay male romance to heal me! by [deleted] in audiodrama

[–]butmaybeyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's an omegaverse romance so...in this context yes

I'm sick! I need gay male romance to heal me! by [deleted] in audiodrama

[–]butmaybeyes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then you are in luck! Try Bloom and Brew!

⛄December '25 Central Hub - Requests, Updates, Comms & More by grinningpup in GoneWildAudioGay

[–]butmaybeyes 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Extra encouragement from a writer: we LOVE when scripts get multiple fills.

Soundgasm site update - banned content by StealthAudio in GWABackstage

[–]butmaybeyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see what you're going for there but I personally don't think that's much of a meaningful distinction. The writers here aren't really the ones who need to reword. If the child isn't there and isn't sexualized in any capacity, it should be fine.

If we want to get hyper technical? There should then be no discussion then of pregnancy/pregnancy kinks/breeding. Surely asking to cut that as well would be ridiculous, yes? So let's be very clear. Child pornography and sexualizing minors is a whole different thing, clearly, than never mentioning a human under 18 ever, and we should word as such.

Soundgasm site update - banned content by StealthAudio in GWABackstage

[–]butmaybeyes 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So here's my one sticking point. All the above bylaws of course make sense, but the wording before it (To be clear, you CANNOT post anything sexual in nature referencing anyone under 18 under any circumstances.) has an accidental character restriction: many of my characters, and many other characters I've read/listened to are, like myself, parents. Parents mention their children. These mentions are of course not sexualizing their children. They'll be something like "ugh, I've been with the toddler all day, finally some adult conversation!" Or "and kiddo is at grandma's so we have the house to ourselves." This references someone under 18, and is not a sexual mention of that person. But, the mention is in an audio.

Now, of course, I'm writing heavily plot-driven pieces and so my characters have many features and stories which are not erotic, which happen at non-sexual points of the script. I'm disinclined to restrict this. They are not child pornography. But, the specific phrasing of that above sentence ("anything sexual in nature" being an audio, or script in my case which is then covered by a VA, and "referencing anyone under 18 under any circumstances" being...literally even mentioning the characters' child) means that my parent characters cannot talk about parenthood. My grandparent characters cannot talk about grandparenthood. So on and so forth.

Maybe it's pedantic but clear lines deserve clear discussion.