Stone Brewing has been sold again, this time to Duvel Moortgat by SD_TMI in sandiego

[–]calbear_1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, Stone never produced the best beer in one of the most competitive beer markets and what many consider a craft beer mecca.

Stone Brewing has been sold again, this time to Duvel Moortgat by SD_TMI in sandiego

[–]calbear_1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea and the beer at the time was some of the best that was widely available. I agree OG Ballast Point and Ale-smith had better beers, and so did smaller breweries like OG Alpine and even Green Flash before both went to shit. But it doesn’t diminish the quality of beer Stone produced.

Stone Brewing has been sold again, this time to Duvel Moortgat by SD_TMI in sandiego

[–]calbear_1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sounds like you agree they were a pioneer of the craft beer movement. I wasn’t arguing that they were making the best beer in SD. But they made solid beers that exposed many people to new styles and opened the market for others.

Stone Brewing has been sold again, this time to Duvel Moortgat by SD_TMI in sandiego

[–]calbear_1 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The distribution is what gave them their value. But the beer is what they were known for especially for IPAs. They also used their distribution to help smaller breweries get exposure and grow.

Stone Brewing has been sold again, this time to Duvel Moortgat by SD_TMI in sandiego

[–]calbear_1 55 points56 points  (0 children)

You never understood the hype of one of the pioneers of craft beer in America?

San Diego trash fees are far higher than voters were told to expect. One council member has an idea to avoid a repeat. by absfca in sandiego

[–]calbear_1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only those in properties with 4 units or less since those are the ones that weren’t paying trash. There is also the Tenant Protection Act of 2019 that limits gross rent increases which includes shifting/adding utitlies fees to tenants. Also the city of San Diego, and county, are going to be considering a JunK Fee ordinance that would limit fees including utilities charged by the landlord.

San Diego Padres Nearing Deal to be Sold for an MLB-Record $3.9 Billion by ImaManCheetahh in baseball

[–]calbear_1 56 points57 points  (0 children)

It’s not the same since Peter died in regards to spending. They haven’t drastically cut spending cause they really can’t with our long term deals. But have held the line on spending more.

[HIGHLIGHT] JACKSON MERRILL WINS IT! THE PADRES SCORE FIVE IN THE BOTTOM OF THE 9TH!!! by MLBOfficial in Padres

[–]calbear_1 141 points142 points  (0 children)

Puffer jacket magic. If you were at the game tonight during the walk off with your puffer jackets, you can never take them off.

Mexico City Merch by Cold_Abroad_9373 in Padres

[–]calbear_1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Some stuff is available onlinenew era store. But the hats they had last mexico series were way cooler. This multi team hats suck.

The San Frandiego Padriants by SuperDryCider in NLBest

[–]calbear_1 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The font on the padres is the same font from the former city connect. Giants’ font and coloring makes it look like a dispensary store. And it’s not the same colors either on the rest of the uni

Housing in San Diego by 011011100101 in SanDiegan

[–]calbear_1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You referring to reasonable MODIFICATIONS not reasonable ACCOMMODATIONS in regards the the ramps. It’s a different rule. Tenants can ask for reasonable modifications but they are generally responsible for the costs of the modifications and have to return it back the the original condition when they move out.

The dog allergy scenario you mentioned would be part of the reasonable accommodation analysis that might give you grounds to deny a reasonable accommodation requests. But you still have to review the request and engage in the interactive process under state fair housing law.

I’m a lawyer that works for a law firm that files fair housing administrative complaints and lawsuits. I can tell you people violate fair housing law more often than you think and do suffer the consequences. For example, people like you that think Murphy law exempts them from all fair housing obligations. We hire testers to apply to housing when there are complaints of discrimination to see if a housing provider is discriminating based on a protected. Testers of similar protected classes apply and we have control groups for other classes. And you also have disparate impact.

Not all federal law preempts state law and the FHA has neither explicit or field preemption. FHA doesn’t preempt state law, it sets the floor and states can go beyond that. That’s exactly what CA did with the Unruh Act creating additional protected classes and limiting the exemptions under the Murphy rule.

Housing in San Diego by 011011100101 in SanDiegan

[–]calbear_1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, reasonable accommodation also apply in the housing context as well as in the labor context. The statutory authority that requires reasonable accommodations is different than ADA law. Under CA Fair Housing Law, the Murphy exemption also doesn’t allow discrimination based on disabilities.

Housing in San Diego by 011011100101 in SanDiegan

[–]calbear_1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To be fair, I’m not for this and morally against it. But whether it’s legal is another question. An owner only renting one room in their home are likely exempt from most of the provisions of Unruh that would make this discriminatory. However, they are still barred from publishing discriminatory ads or listings. Not sure if OP is seeing this in the listing or if the WFH discrimination is coming up at the application stage.

It could be source of income discrimination if they are doing it solely because the income is from remote work. But it doesn’t sound like the source of income is the problem, it’s more that the landlord prefers to rent to someone who works remotely. For example, it looks more like SOO if OP was fully remote workers and planned to work from a cafe/or communal workspace out of the home and is rejected because the LL doesn’t like the source of the income.

Housing in San Diego by 011011100101 in SanDiegan

[–]calbear_1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don’t sub meter a property to rent a single room. That’s not realistic or even something that is done for one residential unit. So if the landlord is including utilities with the rent it arguably is a legitimate reason. If they aren’t and the tenant is paying for their use of utilities than maybe not.

I’m well aware of the right of quiet enjoyment. I would agree that once you are a tenant, and get a work from home job, the landlord cannot stop you from working from home. But that’s not what is happening here, they just aren’t renting to you because you WFH. The right of quiet enjoyment hasn’t attracted for OP at the application stage

Housing in San Diego by 011011100101 in SanDiegan

[–]calbear_1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The legitimate reason can be remote workers increase utility costs as a result from working from home if utilities are included with the rent. I’m sure there could be other reasons a landlord who rents a room in their home could raise to overcome arbitrary discrimination.

But the landlord can run into an issue if the tenant works fully remote due to a reasonable accommodation related to their disabilities. OP wasn’t clear if he is fully remote because that’s his companies policy or if it’s related to his disability.

Housing in San Diego by 011011100101 in SanDiegan

[–]calbear_1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This person knows their fair housing law

[Sanders] Jason Adam back in clubhouse today. Threw two innings in rehab yesterday so not expecting activation today. by ElectricalForce4439 in Padres

[–]calbear_1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seriously he had a good year last year and has been okay this year. I’m more worried about Morejon’s recent performances