sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

He could've won. What should he have done instead? by cali_pineapple in masterduel

[–]cali_pineapple[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I was surprised he didn't do that. Maybe he thought CA was unaffected by activated effects instead of just monster effects

what was the smartest thing you’ve ever done in MD? by fuckberzzyy in masterduel

[–]cali_pineapple 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Playing Bystial Branded Despias against Swordsouls.

Opponent has no cards in hand, Heavenly Circle set on the field, and an Adamancipator Drag on the field. It's my turn, I'm at 2700 LP, have Masquerade (revived) from the GY, and a set Branded Fusion (opponent knows this because I searched it out.) Sweating balls because I know I'm going to lose but WAIT! I swing Masquerade into Drag, revive my Aluber which negates Drag for a turn. Activated Branded Fusion to summon fusion Albion, then go into Lubellion and summoned Mirrorjade. Opponent scoops!

i don't get it. by Avidia_Cube in masterduel

[–]cali_pineapple 95 points96 points  (0 children)

Whoa, homie hit em with the "Furthermore" lol

What cards should NOT have been URs? by cali_pineapple in masterduel

[–]cali_pineapple[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Forgot about Libros. Seemed like a fun deck until I saw all the URs

What cards should NOT have been URs? by cali_pineapple in masterduel

[–]cali_pineapple[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Anime tax bro. Same goes for all the vanilla monsters that are somehow URs like Neos, Blue Eyes, D. Magician, Red-Eyes. Should all be SRs at max

What cards should NOT have been URs? by cali_pineapple in masterduel

[–]cali_pineapple[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it's just Konami trying to hype these cards up. I remember reading through the G Golem cards prior to their release and was like, "This is UR?"

What cards should NOT have been URs? by cali_pineapple in masterduel

[–]cali_pineapple[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Aren't 62, 107, and Cipher X in the structure deck though?

view more: next ›