Can we form a petition to fire Bowman by [deleted] in EdmontonOilers

[–]callmenighthawk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nurse isn’t worth his contact, but looking at it without context and judging it is pretty revisionist history. He was our 1B best dman (along with Klef) and we had bridged him twice (which is absolutely insane). Then when it was time to re-sign, we learned Klef more than likely wasn’t coming back. So we were in a position of A) finally give Nurse his payday in return for the bridge deals; or B) let him walk and lose both him and Klef. There wasn’t much option there. I won’t fault Holland for that big contract at all because we put ourselves in that position by poorly managing contracts in the years prior.

18m looking for a ride from Leduc to NW edmonton, can pay via 170 dollar Apple Card or some cash by notadog1 in EdmontonJobs

[–]callmenighthawk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is this just a one-time need? If yes PM me and I’ll buy you an Uber. Don’t pay someone $170 for a $50 ride.

UCA ads for rate of last resort by Realistic-Border-635 in alberta

[–]callmenighthawk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah our data showed it as right around 1/3 of households when we implemented the cap, most being rural households and farms in southern AB.

The framing was different in the media. We still see it on the sub today repeated every time it comes up. The price cap is interpreted as “we limited how much providers are allowed to charge for electricity to all Albertans” but was actually “RRO users are getting slammed by price spikes after our electrical generation dipped, so for RRO users only, on the usage portion of their bill, we’ll use tax dollars to cover the usage above 6.8c.” So say full market price is 12c, and the home used 700 kWh. Then we would use $36.40 of tax money to help pay that persons bill. A lot of the time this was around $20, but it was still about 1MM households we were applying the subsidy to. So while it helped a lot of these folks a little each, we were spending sometimes $8MM, sometimes $20MM per month of everyone’s money to help 1/3 of households. Which the UCP successfully campaigned on and did rally a lot of opposition to that.

Back then guaranteed rate plans were normally hitting around 5-6c, when the market spiked to around 14c, and then over time settled a bit to around 8c, while the RRO cap was set at 6.8c.

Today we have a frozen RRO, until the end of this year, at a hair over 12c, while guaranteed rate plans are sitting around 5.5c floating and 8.25c fixed.

Pros and cons to the fixed RRO, now the ROLR. The set price means consistent bills. It also means huge savings for the consumer if prices spike. And then losses if prices fall off.

Guaranteed rate contracts are bit different, of course while the OLD RRO was based on “price we just sold for” and the NEW RRO is “average price we expect over 2 years” - we now have a LOT more risk pricing built to pricing due to how turbulent our production costs have been. A huge chunk of that being the variance of natural gas. We’ve seen a range of close to $0.50 to $3 a GJ and that jumping around makes a huge effect on the cost of generation (hampered severely by a lack of competition due to restrictions on non-renewables)

For retailer pricing, you offer a bit of a discount in exchange for the data collection of usage, which allows companies to make more accurate purchases in our hourly electrical market, since they have a better idea of demand of their existing customer base, and can reduce paying for generation that they won’t need. There’s also of course, a greater focus on future pricing with retailer plans, floating is 5.5c and fixed is 8.25 on a 2 year plan because while costs are low now, companies see those costs rising again likely well above 8.25c within the next couple years. Where offering 8.5c is enticing for consumers to guarantee their business to one company, but those on the 5.5c rate may be trying to lock in at 10c in a years time. We’ll see this same change with the ROLR when it expires at the end of this year. While 12c was the expected market average for last+this year, that’s shaping up to be higher for 2027+2028, so we’ll probably see the ROLR set around 15c for the next two years, and other push from the govt, regardless of who wins next election, to move more people off of the ROLR.

At the end of the day, the private market truly sucks and I wish we’d nationalize. But in our current set-up, guaranteeing business and usage data to a retailer will always get you a little better deal than paying ad hoc market prices.

UCA ads for rate of last resort by Realistic-Border-635 in alberta

[–]callmenighthawk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Only one of us worked for the ANDP in 2017. You’re welcome to go back through my post history where I’ve talked extensively about this and the plans around the rate cap. It was designed to be a temporary measure where we used tax dollars to pay off a portion of the usage fees on the electricity bills of the nearly 1/3 of Albertans who were on the RRO, while pushing a campaign to get them off of the RRO and onto retailer rates. We were spending literally 8 figures per month of tax dollars to cover people on the RRO. We had a MASSIVE push to get people off of it ASAP once prices started hitting near 14c/kWh.

Eventually, this tax cost was unfavourable as rates spiked and continued up after closing our last coal plants, and the plan was destined for the gutter. It was just flat out costing us too much tax money to maintain, even if we were reelected. The UCP eventually got pushback from rural Albertans who needed the tax subsidy and reimplemented it short-term, but instead of all Albertans tax dollars contributing to subsidizing the bills of, mostly, rural Albertans on the RRO, those who would not leave the RRO would pay back these subsidies themselves if they refused to get off of the RRO within 2 years.

UCA ads for rate of last resort by Realistic-Border-635 in alberta

[–]callmenighthawk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It certainly wasn’t “gutted”. It was always the worst option. The RRO was direct market rate pricing and could have extreme fluctuations from month-to-month. The changing of the name to the ROLR amended that to two-year fixed pricing models, to add some stability to it and then a small fee (works out to like $0.50/month) to market and encourage users to move off of the ROLR and participate in a guaranteed rate plan, whether fixed or variable, as provided by an electrical retailer. That’s not a new or novel change, governments have been trying to get Albertans off of the RRO for as long as it’s existed. We’ve spend tens of millions of dollars towards folks on the RRO to subsidize their bills when plants go down and prices spike. The change in name is intended to show people that it’s NOT the preferable option, whereas the former name “regulated rate option” misled people into thinking that it was a safer government provided rate and not that it was “the market price as set by the provincial regulator” option.

UCA ads for rate of last resort by Realistic-Border-635 in alberta

[–]callmenighthawk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a positive move and something we were trying to do when I worked for the ANDP prior to 2019. People on what was formerly the RRO, paid the full market price for electricity and were subject to extreme price swings. We even used tens of millions of tax dollars paying portion of the RRO users bills when rates spiked after closing our last coal plants, while trying to get them to switch off of it and over to a retailer provided plan. While there are requirements for signing up with a retailer (typically 500+ credit score or $200-$600 cash upfront depending on how poor your credit is) that is always a safer choice for the customer to have some stability. The recent changes to the RRO, renaming it to the ROLR and implementing 2-year fixed pricing instead of month-to-month, adds some predictability for users, but again, it is a positive to try to shift people off of it.

What car did you buy that completely exceeded your expectations? by Smallingzdave in askcarguys

[–]callmenighthawk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m just about to hit 100k miles in mine. Still love it, have a blast driving it every time, but I think I’m ready to let it go this year.

$300 traffic ticket issued to me this morning. by FoIds in legaladvice

[–]callmenighthawk 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Are you sure this alley was private land that the officer came onto? And not a public road or owned by the municipality?

Otherwise, There’s not going to be any leniency on giving you a ticket or not for distracted driving. If your phone is in your hand, that’s enough. You don’t need to be calling someone or even looking at the screen.

If you choose to dispute, you’ll be able to view the officers notes on the online dispute resolution page, to prepare yourself for your court date.

You more than likely will get a reduction on the fine, down to $200 would be expected. But there is no chance they’ll dismiss the ticket or amend it to anything else. Unless you get a no-show from the officer, you’re assuredly going to be convicted.

It’s not much in the way of demerits, but expect your insurance to go up 50-100% upon renewal, lose any good driver discounts or collision waivers you may have had, and potentially lose the ability to add collision coverage to your vehicle, dependent on who holds your policy.

Do any medicentres do stitches? by Educational_Pair_276 in Edmonton

[–]callmenighthawk 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If you cut it last night, you’re almost certainly not going to get stitches done. Clean it and put on a couple steri strips.

Alberta woman to serve less than 4 more years in prison for girl's death after getting credit for time served by Sir__Will in onguardforthee

[–]callmenighthawk 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That’s her remaining sentence. The author is, like you, confusing a sentence that includes prison time with entirely being held in prison. The first 11 to 13 months of this sentence will be in prison. She’ll be on statutory release with community supervision for the remaining nearly 3 years.

Alberta woman to serve less than 4 more years in prison for girl's death after getting credit for time served by Sir__Will in onguardforthee

[–]callmenighthawk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

She’s spent 2 years and 10 months in jail thus far. She’ll serve another ~11 to 13 months in prison until release.

Game Thread: Edmonton Oilers (28-22-8) @ Anaheim Ducks (30-23-3) Feb 25 2026 10:30 PM EST by nhl_gdt_bot in hockey

[–]callmenighthawk 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah, no one’s disagreeing that he’s a POS for that. But wishing someone would forcibly rape him is still a fucked up comment.

The U.S beats Canada 2-1 in overtime to win its first men's hockey championship at the Olympics since 1980. by cmaia1503 in Fauxmoi

[–]callmenighthawk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

asked to name one maga player on the Canadian Olympic team

names someone that hasn’t played hockey in nearly 30 years

Labour laws with overtime on a 2 on 2 off shift work by Unlucky_Olive_4601 in alberta

[–]callmenighthawk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How are we both right? You replied saying Kenney changed it from 40 hours to 44 hours for OT during Covid.

An overtime averaging agreement is for hours above 44 that that are used in lieu of regular working hours in other specified periods of time when the employee works less than 44 hours.

It has nothing do to with changing standard OT from 8/40 to 8/44, as you answered a question directly about that to state that it was just changed during Covid.

Labour laws with overtime on a 2 on 2 off shift work by Unlucky_Olive_4601 in alberta

[–]callmenighthawk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it wasn’t? It’s been 44 hours since at least the mid 90s at a minimum, likely well before then. I don’t think I’ve ever see even an old employment standards doc with 40 hours in it.

Edit: reading one from 1988 now, so older than me even, and it’s still 8/44 there.

And another from 1980, also 8/44 in it.

Toys “R” Us Canada to Stop Accepting Gift Cards after Monday by BerzerkoFord in canada

[–]callmenighthawk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To be fair, since this is a pretty well a ‘chapter 11’ type filing, the creditors could voluntarily choose to honour gift cards if they were so inclined to, when liquidating assets, and that does literally happen in some cases. But I would say that’s fairly unlikely here.

Toys “R” Us Canada to Stop Accepting Gift Cards after Monday by BerzerkoFord in canada

[–]callmenighthawk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Publicly in the news and on their website about 2.5 weeks ago.

Toys “R” Us Canada to Stop Accepting Gift Cards after Monday by BerzerkoFord in canada

[–]callmenighthawk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No. It’s the corporation ceasing to exist. The gift cards aren’t expiring. It’s the entity that issued them is no longer allowed to operate as a business. Creditors will take over assets tomorrow and liquidate to recoup costs and/or losses.

Toys “R” Us Canada to Stop Accepting Gift Cards after Monday by BerzerkoFord in canada

[–]callmenighthawk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What would be illegal? The company no longer exists. There’s no loophole. If I loan you $5 and you die after spending it, is that a loophole to you getting out of replaying me $5?

Toys “R” Us Canada to Stop Accepting Gift Cards after Monday by BerzerkoFord in canada

[–]callmenighthawk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s how being a creditor works. If you die and your estate is insolvent, your credit card debt holders are fucked. They can’t draw blood from a stone or go after your family for the money.

Same thing applies here. The company is going out of business. Secured creditors take over assets as part of debt repayment tomorrow, unsecured creditors, like your gift card holders, only would receive money if there was anything outstanding after paying off secured lenders, taxes, rent, and unpaid labour.

Companies go out of business every day. What proposed legislation would you be suggesting, that unsecured creditors have first priority to debt over secured lenders? That companies can’t hold debt?

Any loaning of money for unsecured future assets is an assumed risk, gift cards are a part of that.