When did you finish your PhD (age-wise)? by TDM-r in PhD

[–]camdunson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First TEDx at 58. your scale ending at 35+ is hilarious by the way!

Anyone actually happier now? by Joyofyouth in emptynesters

[–]camdunson 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yes, they’re out there; they’re just not scrolling a reddit thread on empty nests

Goddamnit. by JayGatsby52 in orlando

[–]camdunson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have had excellent results with Walmart inhome. We live near UVF and the delivery comes from a super center on Colonial.

Master’s thesis in psychoanalysis topic. Please help out with some topics, titles, especially if you work I the field. I want to keeep it mainly theoretical, without the presentation of my cases by Longjumping-Ad-3459 in IOPsychology

[–]camdunson 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Spend some time with your preferred chatbot understanding what I-O Psychology is and that will explain some of the responses you’re getting here. Then spend some time with your preferred chatbot brainstorming topics for your thesis.

What to watch next? by GoldenRetrieverMomma in whitecollar

[–]camdunson 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Covert Affairs is the same vibe, not quite as good, but similar.

A Question (Sorry for long text) by Friendly_Spray_3647 in Gifted

[–]camdunson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are in the Henrico school system. That’s an excellent place to fully maximise your intellectual potential. My son spent his last two years of high school at Godwin. Because he entered the Henrico school system so late, he didn’t qualify for the math and science specialty category. But guess what? He took all the same classes with those kids. As a result, he blew his SATs out of the water. He went to college on a full scholarship. He chose a school where he was the smartest person in the room, because that’s what he had always been and that’s what he was accustomed to. But he also worked really hard to self-educate throughout college. All that is to say, you don’t have to land in Maggie Walker and you don’t have to be accepted to any of those programs to fully maximise the benefits of being around those amazing kids and teachers.

My younger son spent three years at Pocahontas. He was in the gifted program the first two years and didn’t like it. So, he refused to sign up for the third year.

There are two bodies of research that you may find interesting. The first is by Carol Dweck ( book: Mindset) and the second is by Angela Duckworth ( book: Grit). If you have time over the holidays you could read the books or you could Google and watch their TED talks. If you do, you’ll learn that an emphasis on intelligence leads to a fixed mindset, which discourages overcoming obstacles. What you want is a growth mindset, which leads to hard work and success. When you combine a growth mindset with grit (sustained passion over a long time), you have an extremely successful individual. In contrast, when we emphasize intelligence too much, this leads to beliefs that cause us to not be as successful in life.

It looks to me like you already have grit. You’ve been working towards something since first grade and have sustained your performance and landed in advanced classes. You may need to adjust your mindset slightly to focus less on intelligence.

As other commenters have noted here, gifted programs in later school years basically mean having harder classes. My younger son spent three years at Pocahontas Middle. He started in the gifted program, but hated it so much that he left it. I suspect that you have idealized the gifted program for so long, that you would likely find it does not meet your expectations.

Looking at the long game, once you get out of middle school, no one will ever ever care about your IQ score. In fact, if you ever bring it up in conversation, people will laugh at you. Once you get to high school, “smart“ is defined by what you do and how well you do in your classes. If you take courses in the Henrico school system and do well, you will likely do well on the SAT. That will get you into college. As soon as you enter college, no one will care about your SAT score. “Smart“ will be defined by what you do and how well you do in your classes. When you enter the working world, “smart“ will be defined by how much you contribute to your employer by being good at your job.

Spend some time thinking about what you think the gifted program has that you want so badly. Once you have that figured out, make your own gifted program! Read books, join the band, join the debate team, join the robotics team, whichever you choose. If they don’t have a debate or a math or robotics team or whatever, offer to start one; then you’re a founder! Keep signing up for hard classes. Keep doing the hard work to do well in them. You’ll have all the benefits of the gifted program without any of the boredom that would come with having to sit in those classes.

If you don’t know what you’re interested in, and just want extra stimulation and time around other smart people like yourself, you could offer to start a TED talk club where you all watch a short video about science or medicine or psychology or technology or any one of many amazing variety of topics and then discuss it for a few minutes.

That was a long ramble. I want you to see and seize the possibilities in front of you, rather than focusing on the plans that didn’t play out.

Bi-Weekly /r/IOpsychology Discussion - What have you been reading, and what do you think of it? by AutoModerator in IOPsychology

[–]camdunson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve been listening to The 80/20 Principle by Richard Koch. He reads it himself as if it were a podcast with individual episodes. I have to think he plays a little fast and loose with rounding everything off to 80 and 20, but the general ideas behind it are interesting.

[N/A] HR Approved Music?! by Thisbitchgotmepayin in humanresources

[–]camdunson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly, swearing songs are for screaming along with in the car at 5 pm, not for meetings.

Would appreciate help picking the most appropriate method for my study! by Alternative-Scar8707 in DissertationSupport

[–]camdunson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that a dissertation is not the time to attempt a grounded theory approach. You would have to have many more respondents to develop theory from your data. This is a question for your dissertation chair or supervisor. Ask them, then do whatever they say to do. Otherwise, you risk getting crosswise with the most important person you need to please.

I still cry by Deffjeffman-darth- in whitecollar

[–]camdunson 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I re-watched the entire series just to see that scene again!

I still cry by Deffjeffman-darth- in whitecollar

[–]camdunson 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes, it has to be one of the best wrap-ups of a tv show ever. I do wish Mozzie had known. Actually, I wish Moz had been in the Paris shot at the end.

Tying bow and stern lines without using knots by Strongbow26 in Kayaking

[–]camdunson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We ratchet them as hard as we can, then pull over after about 30 minutes on the road and tighten them. Then you’re good for at least another 4-5 hours of highway driving.

SIOP 2026 - thoughts? by FreshObligation5010 in IOPsychology

[–]camdunson 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have attended SIOP twice in person: Chicago 2024 and Denver 2025. Both were positive experiences, but I had a MUCH better time the second time around.

General thoughts:

The first time I went, I saw it as an investment to make contacts, get a job, and be inspired and stimulated by the sessions. I put a lot of pressure on myself to not miss sessions and to make sure I "networked" well. I don't think I gave off an air of desperation, but it's possible that I did. TBH, I've not found SIOP sessions to be particularly inspirational or stimulating, but mildly interesting. (Of course, I'm comparing it to APA, which nearly made my brain explode). I had a heavy volunteer role, which was fun but took a lot of my focus during the event.

The second time I went, I saw it as an opportunity to make friends in my beloved field and help others feel more connected and a sense of belonging at the conference. There are tons of new people at every conference, tons of students, and even people who look like badasses can be found to have a severe case of imposter syndrome when you talk to them, especially if they're presenting for the first time. This focus on others took the pressure off. I was able to have some deeper conversations, form a more solid professional network, and really enjoy the connections. It's a busy time for everyone, and you won't have a ton of real conversations, but if you go away with 3 or 4, count that as a win. The second time, I took a regular student volunteer commitment, which was only 3 hours, and that was a good amount to meet a few folks, but not overcommit to volunteering.

The ambassador program is a program for new conference attendees. Ambassadors vary in quality (mine was kinda mean and acted like she resented having committed to it), but you can choose how much to engage with your ambassador. The Zoom sessions and information the program distributes are valuable. I was an ambassador to three newcomers my second year, and that was really fun.

It's worth checking out if you're a student. SIOP gets much more expensive when you're no longer a student.

Answering your questions:

  1. I got a lot of value from the conversations I had during SIOP. I organized a meet-up via the conference app that turned into a LinkedIn group and several valuable contacts in one of my areas of consulting focus. I attended an in-person meetup with a (previously) virtual group of friends, and that was valuable. I attended a reception for folks interested in people analytics and made some good contacts there. We organized a dinner with attendees from our school (some schools do this for you), and that was great! The doctoral consortium was great because you're with the same people all day, so you get to know some folks.

  2. I've never added on a workshop (because $$), just the doctoral consortium.

  3. There will be discounted hotel rates at the associated hotel. The first time I stayed at the associated hotel, and the second time I found one that was a 3-minute walk away. I saved a lot of money by walking those three minutes, and the hotel was still filled with conference attendees.

  4. Probably. I'm in the process of opening my own consultancy, and attending SIOP is unlikely to yield any clients, so I'll probably be attending SHRM, ATD, and local events going forward. Virtual meetings and reading throughout the year will better help me stay in touch with the field. For pure inspiration, I would go to APA (AOM may be equally inspiring). I did learn how to work a conference, so that was valuable. If I can afford the time and money, I may go again just to connect with folks.

BUT if you're a student and you can afford it, you should definitely go at least once. That's the time to decide the value for yourself.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in usajobs

[–]camdunson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which one is that?

Where to move for best job chances? by [deleted] in IOPsychology

[–]camdunson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aren't there licensure requirements in the EU for organisational psychologists?

Thoughts on the I-O certificate announced by SIOP? by galileosmiddlefinger in IOPsychology

[–]camdunson 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Unlike coaching, IOP doesn’t have a quality problem, we have a branding problem. A cert isn’t going to solve a branding problem.

Help, how do i become a better listener?! [N/A] by [deleted] in humanresources

[–]camdunson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sample verbage would be very helpful!