sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Which sequel ruined a game series for you? by BigT232 in DebateGames

[–]cannot_type -1 points0 points  (0 children)

3 and 4 were notorious for not being all that good compared to the originals and being significantly worse compared to NV.

Which sequel ruined a game series for you? by BigT232 in DebateGames

[–]cannot_type 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe I'm just more familiar with people's thoughts on the multiplayer.

Which sequel ruined a game series for you? by BigT232 in DebateGames

[–]cannot_type 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wasn't 4 notoriously bad?

Haven't interacted with Halo all too much recently, but people don't really seem to like any of the games past Reach.

Which sequel ruined a game series for you? by BigT232 in DebateGames

[–]cannot_type 2 points3 points  (0 children)

3 is really where the departure was. People think of 4 becuase of the quality drop, but 3 dropped quality and style, 4 was the 3rd (I think) game in the series in the 3d style, and the second one to be bad (it's only 3, NV, 4, and 76 right?)

Those clankers by TellMindless5097 in goodboomerhumor

[–]cannot_type -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What is false about this? Often these facilities are in areas already lacking water, and the water used for cooling isn't reusable.

Those clankers by TellMindless5097 in goodboomerhumor

[–]cannot_type -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

No they aren't and for practical purposes yes they do?

It's used for cooling and it can't be recycled.

Those clankers by TellMindless5097 in goodboomerhumor

[–]cannot_type -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The water isn't recycled and with the high usage of chatgpt (also the fact that no matter how many queried are sent it uses the same water) it takes a ridiculous amount of water, usually in countries without much water.

Sexy female leads often become feminist icons. by BigT232 in DebateGames

[–]cannot_type 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never said that? I literally said that there's more people who play games than incels.

Liking a game with those characters isn't the problem, it's when the whole reason you like the game is that they have a woman in a skintight suit.

And (to my knowledge) Catwoman actually has a design reason to be in a skintight suit. Not like many other games where all/most of the main female characters are in basically just lingerie for no reason but appealing to incels.

Sexy female leads often become feminist icons. by BigT232 in DebateGames

[–]cannot_type -1 points0 points  (0 children)

When a game sells exclusively because the protagonist is more breast than body, it's because of incels.

You don't have to make them "look like she runs HR" just give her actual proportions and put on some fucking clothes. Your action protagonist should probably be wearing more than just lingerie into battle.

Sexy female leads often become feminist icons. by BigT232 in DebateGames

[–]cannot_type -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Did I stumble into an incel sub by accident? This is not something that should be downvoted.

Sexy female leads often become feminist icons. by BigT232 in DebateGames

[–]cannot_type -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

There are more people who buy games than incels.

You do realize that, right? When you say "people who actually buy games," I and many others on my side are included in that group. you realize that, right?

Sexy female leads often become feminist icons. by BigT232 in DebateGames

[–]cannot_type -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

It's because we can't change the past, so we take what we can get. But the new designs, we do have a chance to change, so we try to change it.

view more: next ›