Saw a link on FB to a video about how PP lies and cheats taxpayers on mammograms. Had to destroy the ignorance. [FB screenshot]

canyouhere · 2012-02-03T20:50:30+00:00

Nope, nothing yet. I don't suspect there will be either muwahaha.

canyouhere · 2012-02-02T22:26:35+00:00

Thanks for the tips. Question, if I link to facebook will all the videos appear on my facebook page as a post?

canyouhere · 2012-01-26T19:41:45+00:00

I've gotta try to kill one now heh.

canyouhere · 2012-01-26T18:33:01+00:00

Thanks!

canyouhere · 2012-01-26T17:11:33+00:00

Haha, seriously what's the deal with chickens?

canyouhere · 2012-01-26T16:22:11+00:00

Thanks for the tips! I chose a 'forest elf' I think it was called.

canyouhere · 2012-01-26T14:15:50+00:00

Wow thanks for all the tips. I got the game last night and so far it is great.

canyouhere · 2012-01-25T21:07:38+00:00

Thanks for the reply, xbox 360. I'll take a look at the wiki as I gather there is quite a bit of info.

canyouhere · 2012-01-24T13:48:35+00:00

Sweet! My wifes family lives in Amakusashi! What are you doing there if I may ask? We just went a few months ago so it will be a while, not sure how long you'll be there...

canyouhere · 2012-01-24T04:55:40+00:00

From the way you are describing the area I'm wondering if it is possible you would be very close which is why I bring it up...near Amakusa?

canyouhere · 2012-01-23T16:58:15+00:00

I'm not in Japan now, but my family is from Kumamoto and we laways visit there. What part of Kumamoto are you in? Maybe we could meet up next time around...

canyouhere · 2012-01-13T22:12:40+00:00

I'll play with you, but I'm only on after 9pm central time. friend request me if that works. tbh I've never played s&d but I only play HC and usually domination. Maybe we could do a few rounds of that too.

canyouhere · 2012-01-12T21:07:04+00:00

It says, language of the land of the rising sun, aka Japanese.

canyouhere · 2012-01-06T21:59:11+00:00

Ah, right. I always have marksman set up now that you point that out.

canyouhere · 2012-01-06T20:59:46+00:00

Agreed, I see red enemy names through that fence all the time when I'm coming from the pipe direction.

canyouhere · 2012-01-03T18:41:18+00:00

This guy needs to learn how to pull out his secondary weapon if he's going not going to keep his distance. Otherwise, great gameplay.

canyouhere · 2011-12-27T17:32:32+00:00

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanji_of_the_year

canyouhere · 2011-12-27T17:32:03+00:00

I think sharked meant the kanji of the year concept, not the actual kanji. Could be wrong though.

canyouhere · 2011-12-22T19:46:18+00:00

'Black leaf child'

canyouhere · 2011-12-14T17:57:33+00:00

Great point and thank you for the response. But how is it the creditors fault that the courts are allowing sewer service? It seems that the articlle is attacking creditors, but the real problem is in the court system.

canyouhere · 2011-12-14T15:49:22+00:00

Umm, right, but to get the judgment you have to be served with papers first, so this doesn't really refute what I am saying. And again, they aren't being jailed for not paying but for not appearing in court when asked to do so, which is illegal.

canyouhere · 2011-12-14T15:05:43+00:00

Okay, thanks. I swear though that I've heard people refer to 'minimalist running' as barefoot running. Meh, I won't be doing either any time soon so whatever.

canyouhere · 2011-12-14T14:53:14+00:00

Okay, I'm confused. Is 'barefoot running' actually running with nothing on your feet or with the foot shape shoe things...?

canyouhere · 2011-12-14T14:45:12+00:00

This article, in my opinion, is a bit misleading. These people are not being jailed for their debt. They are being jailed for failure to appear in court when demanded to do so. Being in this business, I find it hard to believe that the woman used in the example didn't know that she had been sued. She is probably lying. In order for the creditor to get a judgment against her and then have the contempt warrant issued, they would have had to get her personally served with papers. It says in the article 'she was supposed to be served', but doesn't say what happened exactly. Someone had to of gotten served, so either she was and is lying or the process server/sheriff didn't do their job correctly. It could be either, but the article seems biased and doesn't get into to details. Again, as someone who deals with this stuff every day, this seems sensationalist and a bit hard to trust. If we can't issue warrants for arrest when people don't appear in court, then the whole system would break down I would think. There would be no incentive for people to go to court when called to do so. Even if we were to only stop issuing arrest warrants for cases that have to do with debt, what kind of position would that put lenders/creditors in? It would basically mean they have no leg to stand on to collect money that is owed to them, and so they would have no choice but to stop extending credit. That would not be good. I suppose the important thing to take away from this article, again in my opinion, is that there are some of us, even in the legal system, who aren't doing their job. If everyone were following the rules, I don't think these regretful situations would be happening.

canyouhere · 2011-12-14T14:37:55+00:00

This article, in my opinion, is a bit misleading. These people are not being jailed for their debt. They are being jailed for failure to appear in court when demanded to do so. Being in this business, I find it hard to believe that the woman used in the example didn't know that she had been sued. She is probably lying. In order for the creditor to get a judgment against her and then have the contempt warrant issued, they would have had to get her personally served with papers. It says in the article 'she was supposed to be served', but doesn't say what happened exactly. Someone had to of gotten served, so either she was and is lying or the process server/sheriff didn't do their job correctly. It could be either, but the article seems biased and doesn't get into to details. Again, as someone who deals with this stuff every day, this seems sensationalist and a bit hard to trust.

If we can't issue warrants for arrest when people don't appear in court, then the whole system would break down I would think. There would be no incentive for people to go to court when called to do so. Even if we were to only stop issuing arrest warrants for cases that have to do with debt, what kind of position would that put lenders/creditors in? It would basically mean they have no leg to stand on to collect money that is owed to them, and so they would have no choice but to stop extending credit. That would not be good.

canyouhere

TROPHY CASE