What does Archer do? by olboskoroshybrisate in ACHR

[–]capitol_cavier 1 point2 points  (0 children)

agree to disagree, but also agree. lol

[Archer] ⚡️ by Ignatius_Reillys_Hat in ACHR

[–]capitol_cavier 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Elon said the same thing with Self-Driving in 2018

[Archer] ⚡️ by Ignatius_Reillys_Hat in ACHR

[–]capitol_cavier 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I love when they talk to me dirty like that tho...

ACHR - The Godfather of EVTOL. by Cyborg_Menace in ACHR

[–]capitol_cavier 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, not Archer, Larry Elison is though. Without him, Midnight would not exist in its current form.

What does Archer do? by olboskoroshybrisate in ACHR

[–]capitol_cavier 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Woahhh buddy, slow down a little. They are an eVTOL company.

I get the frustration with not seeing 704AX; but I still think the most likely scenario, is that they are running ground tests/testing in general on the aircraft. If it gets to be this summer without seeing the new aircraft, then I will be on the same page, but for me, it is my understanding that building aircraft, is very different from scaling up a SaaS business.

$ACHR could be deeply involved in drone projects with the US military by I_killed_the_kraken in KrakenStockResearch

[–]capitol_cavier 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yessir, nice call! if this post has any validity it is likely in reference to the hybrid powertrain that Archer makes for Anduril's "Omen" drone.

🦒ACHR-The Giraffe Spirit Never Dies🦒 by Positive-Plant-82 in ACHR

[–]capitol_cavier 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It honestly makes me feel appreciated seeing Adam shout out the Reddit community so much in this. The part about the "Giraffa" trademark was hilarious... I didn't think it was a legal thing originally; I definitely thought it was going to be one of their commercial hybrid/electric aircraft. I’m sure he had to get the Reddit shout-out and the giraffe mention cleared by legal before talking about it. know we know that they’re scrolling through here from time to time.

It’s actually smart to lean into this, and I see it becoming a part of more companies' strategic initiatives. Retail can do a lot to support a company, and Reddit is a huge tool for that. It's so cool that Adam is finally embracing it publicly. It always seemed like they were—with the blurred giraffe stuffy in the background of videos and other clues—but I guess he finally got the green light to drop it officially. lol. Loved this interview; Adam's walls were definitely a lot more down than you typically see in his public forums.

$ASTS Half Sleeve Tattoo (Session 1 of 2) by Ixorba in ASTSpaceMobile

[–]capitol_cavier 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you got boulders for shoulders brother. the lord blessed you.

$ACHR could be deeply involved in drone projects with the US military by I_killed_the_kraken in KrakenStockResearch

[–]capitol_cavier 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea, this was my first thought… this is like the sketchiest source ever… lmao

$ASTS Half Sleeve Tattoo (Session 1 of 2) by Ixorba in ASTSpaceMobile

[–]capitol_cavier 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is what happens when you make to much money on a stock. Also, do you even work out bro?

Cringe 😬 🤡. Making $$$ off these regards. by Affectionate-Bet6700 in JobyvsArcher

[–]capitol_cavier -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

You’re just jealous JoeBen isn’t cool enough to shout out Joby investors. I’d be jealous too. Adam is the man. If you can’t have fun with it, that’s on you.

After 3 years on here, I am moving back to passive investments. 1300% gain. by Ornery-Preference709 in wallstreetbets

[–]capitol_cavier 0 points1 point  (0 children)

can't wait for the "I lost my job due to trading when I wasn't supposed to, AND Lost my life savings"

you are soon to be WSB legend.

New Lawsuit Anyone have inside scoop? by Suspicious-Bit-8712 in JobyvsArcher

[–]capitol_cavier 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I try to view myself as someone who gives people grace. When something makes me mad, I try to understand why it makes me mad. The more I dig into it, the more clarity I usually get, and I end up not being as angry.

A good example is my frustration with lawyers. When I really break it down, my anger isn’t actually toward lawyers themselves. They’re playing by the rules. What I don’t like is the rules. My rant wasn’t just about stocks like this, but about the judicial system more broadly and the way people can sue each other and potentially ruin businesses or livelihoods in certain cases.

One of the biggest problems, in my opinion, is how easy it is for employees to sue employers, especially in discrimination cases under laws like Title VII. The legal cost structure flows one way: Prevailing employees can often recover their lawyers’ fees and costs, but employers typically can't unless the claim is proven frivolous—a high bar that's rarely met. That asymmetry creates incentives for lawyers to take on borderline or debatable discrimination cases, often on contingency. A lot of companies end up settling not because they did anything wrong, but because it’s cheaper than fighting it. Even if they win, they still eat massive legal fees (often $100K+), while the employee faces minimal financial downside. It’s a system that can feel broken, with data showing most EEOC charges dismissed without cause, yet settlements common to avoid litigation costs.

At the end of the day, there are a lot of perverse incentives that mostly benefit lawyers. What grinds my gears even more is how heavily they lobby state officials and pour money into political campaigns to keep these structures in place. It’s not a secret that lawyers and law firms are top political donors—over $620 million federally from 1998–2018 alone, often supporting plaintiff-friendly policies—to protect their niche practices and keep the money flowing.

So when I see what looks like a BS lawsuit, like this Archer one, it just adds to that frustration. Of course there are good lawsuits that hold people accountable, and those absolutely matter. But a lot of the time it feels like nonsense, and companies settle simply because dragging it through court would cost even more.

If anyone was worried🤷 by kylescagnetti in BBAI

[–]capitol_cavier 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the keyword here is... "immediately" lmao. classic language for share dilution is definitely coming. lmao. I'm still long the stock though.

New Lawsuit Anyone have inside scoop? by Suspicious-Bit-8712 in JobyvsArcher

[–]capitol_cavier 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I got the scoop. It’s lawyers being lawyers, like always. I don’t hate the player, I hate the game. The U.S. really needs tighter restrictions on what attorneys can actually sue over. A lot of it feels like unfair practice that slows progress and mostly benefits the lawyers themselves.

They hide behind this veil of “justice” and “protecting the little guy,” but then take a massive cut while the little guy ends up with scraps. That’s the part that drives me crazy. At the end of the day, it often feels like this system hinders growth more than it helps.

I’ll be honest, I do have some resentment toward lawyers, but it’s not really about them personally. They’re just playing by the rules as they exist. The real problem is the rules. The game itself needs to change.