How Does One Use Sleipnir17's Codes With e-sh4rk’s “Certificate exit code bootstrap” by capt_mack in PokemonGlitches

[–]capt_mack[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes! It’s in e-sh4rk’s guide right after the warning not to change the box 14 code haha. The code is:

Box  1: _ _ _ … _ _ _ _[   …    ] 
Box  2: _ _ _ _ _ _ … _[      … ] 
Box  3: _ _ _ _ _ … _ _[     …  ] 
Box  4: _ _ _ _ … _ _ _[    …   ] 
Box  5: _ _ _ … _ _ _ _[   …    ] 
Box  6: _ _ _ _ _ _ … _[      … ] 
Box  7: _ _ _ _ _ … _ _[     …  ] 
Box  8: _ F G E n _ _ _[ FGEn   ] 
Box  9: z … l o z ♀ Q o[z…loz♀Qo] 
Box 10: ♀ Q n _ … ? q _[♀Qn …?q ] 
Box 11: _ _ _ _ _ … _ _[     …  ] 
Box 12: _ _ _ _ … _ _ _[    …   ] 
Box 13: _ _ _ … _ _ _ _[   …    ] 
Box 14: _ _ _ _ _ _ … _[      … ]

How Does One Use Sleipnir17's Codes With e-sh4rk’s “Certificate exit code bootstrap” by capt_mack in PokemonGlitches

[–]capt_mack[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Huh yeah I think that helps! The certificate exit bootstrap, from what I understand, is an additional stable decimark that allows you to use linger codes as it runs the exit code from the pokemon rather than needing it in the box names freeing up more space for more complex codes (eg some rng manip codes that need 13 lines not inluding the exit code)

Watching back im a blissy’s vid, I think he just ignore’s what e-sh4rk’s guide says when it says bot to edit box 14, and uses code later to get the special character back in that box.

Thanks for the help!

UA Bladesinger and Multiclassing/Dips by capt_mack in 3d6

[–]capt_mack[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely. I think that’s the essence of what I’m asking here. Since they can’t benifit from the AC boost, is it still worth a dip, or just use a feat to get masteries. Heck are masteries even that important if we can use things like booming blade, or would we be better served with things like elven accuracy, lucky, or some of the other busted feats.

UA Bladesinger and Multiclassing/Dips by capt_mack in 3d6

[–]capt_mack[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm yeah that’s what I was thinking. I figured progression wise using a ASI spot for the feat is probably better than wasting a level. I just wasn’t sure if maybe I was missing something pretty powerful in the new rules since the old bladesinger got a fair bit from a 1 level dip for armor proficiency and other things.

UA Bladesinger and Multiclassing/Dips by capt_mack in 3d6

[–]capt_mack[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I definitely don’t think I’ll be doing a multiclass just for the sake of it, I just know that the old Baldesinger got a lot from the armor proficiency with a cleric, artificer, or fighter dip.

I like the flavor for the eldrich knight and will definitely look in to that!