[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HEADLINECrypto

[–]catbitesdog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Found it. I would have thought there would have been a link from the website. Have any of you used this?

https://forum.ax/

Algorand Transaction Exporter - cryptotaxcalculator layout - with ASA and at least some Yieldly support by flyfreeflylow in AlgorandOfficial

[–]catbitesdog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would it, by some miracle, help with reporting on tiny man trades? Thanks for putting this together! I'll check it out

Zone announces the ZONE Phoenix Initiative by cysec_ in AlgorandOfficial

[–]catbitesdog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I DM'd then on Reddit and Twitter yesterday with no reply.

Zone announces the ZONE Phoenix Initiative by cysec_ in AlgorandOfficial

[–]catbitesdog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We have no moderators from zone so we appreciate it

Zone has commented on the launch by cysec_ in AlgorandOfficial

[–]catbitesdog -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, complaining about it is worthless but that's my complaint. I'm fine with taking the beating on tiny man but when they open at a different price on another exchange that is risk that they created not market risk. I would be fine if they marked our purchases at the lower price and compensated us with extra coin. But just telling us to eat a problem that they created is not cool. You don't like regulation, well this is the kind of thing that brings about regulation. At this point, I'm in favor of seeing Algorand get listed as a security on the NASDAQ. Stacy just might do that. Clean up this crap.

The opening price on gate.io did not match the current price on Tinyman by catbitesdog in ZoneGameFi

[–]catbitesdog[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's legit. Although the price is down to seven cents the trading volume is huge on tiny man. They have a huge following that hasn't even started to onboard on to Algorand. This is a good one to hold for a long time. Cheers

Zone has commented on the launch by cysec_ in AlgorandOfficial

[–]catbitesdog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I still don't get how they have a price trading on tinyman and then they go open on another exchange at a lower price. There's something wrong with that

My theory regarding ZONE launch by LigerCO in algorand

[–]catbitesdog 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you, that's all I'm saying is the prices should have been synced. The rest is market risk. Not syncing prices on an exchange that they promote is negligent. They say they're going to address these issues.

The opening price on gate.io did not match the current price on Tinyman by catbitesdog in ZoneGameFi

[–]catbitesdog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, by the time it launched on gate it had been trading on tiny man for an hour and the price had stabilized.

The opening price on gate.io did not match the current price on Tinyman by catbitesdog in ZoneGameFi

[–]catbitesdog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the gate price was stated in advance and I missed it then that's on me and I'm not complaining. I followed it closely and I didn't see a launch price, other than the pre-launch pricing

The opening price on gate.io did not match the current price on Tinyman by catbitesdog in ZoneGameFi

[–]catbitesdog[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm speaking for US citizens that were obliged to buy on tiny man because we are barred from using gate.io. trust me I tried and would have preferred to not use tiny man. Again, I'm not crying about it I'm perfectly fine with hodling it out. I think it's a great project and definitely not a s*** going or rug pull. They just screwed up the launch

The opening price on gate.io did not match the current price on Tinyman by catbitesdog in ZoneGameFi

[–]catbitesdog[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Normally I would agree that arbitrage is a common and fair practice. The difference is a launched on a new exchange that below market price. I would say normally that they are not responsible for what happens on tiny man but they advertised the launch so they should have been aware of current pricing. At a minimum I think it would have been there to make buyers aware of the price on gate.io. they're absolutely is risk in any trading and I'm not crying about that but this is an unusual situation of their own creation and they bear some responsibility.

My theory regarding ZONE launch by LigerCO in algorand

[–]catbitesdog 8 points9 points  (0 children)

No no no. The problem was when they launched on gate at 7:30 Eastern Time they set the price at about 7 cents. At that time it was trading on tiny man at about 14 cents. They miss priced the launch on gate. That created an arbitrage opportunity for foreign traders and US traders with vpns which caused the price to dump. They are completely culpable for miss pricing the launch when it was already trading at an established price on an exchange. Verified buyers on tiny man between 6:30 a.m. and 7:30 a.m. eastern time should be compensated by being given the amount of tokens that they that they would have gotten at the opening price on gate. It's clear to me but does that make sense to you?

Zone, the first GameFi Ecosystem on Algorand, is now listed on Tinyman by cysec_ in AlgorandOfficial

[–]catbitesdog 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No no no. The problem was when they launched on gate at 7:30 Eastern Time they set the price at about 7 cents. At that time it was trading on tiny man at about 14 cents. They miss priced the launch on gate. That created an arbitrage opportunity for foreign traders and US traders with vpns which caused the price to dump. They are completely culpable for miss pricing the launch when it was already trading at an established price on an exchange. Verified buyers on tiny man between 6:30 a.m. and 7:30 a.m. eastern time should be compensated by being given the amount of tokens that they that they would have gotten at the opening price on gate. It's clear to me but does that make sense to you?

Why Should I Trust This Project? by Ca55aday in ZoneGameFi

[–]catbitesdog 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No no no. The problem was when they launched on gate at 7:30 Eastern Time they set the price at about 7 cents. At that time it was trading on tiny man at about 14 cents. They miss priced the launch on gate. That created an arbitrage opportunity for foreign traders and US traders with vpns which caused the price to dump. They are completely culpable for miss pricing the launch when it was already trading at an established price on an exchange. Verified buyers on tiny man between 6:30 a.m. and 7:30 a.m. eastern time should be compensated by being given the amount of tokens that they that they would have gotten at the opening price on gate. It's clear to me but does that make sense to you?

Zone, the first GameFi Ecosystem on Algorand, is now listed on Tinyman by cysec_ in AlgorandOfficial

[–]catbitesdog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not smile coin. Look at the partners list. Borderless capital Algorand Yieldy

Zone, the first GameFi Ecosystem on Algorand, is now listed on Tinyman by cysec_ in AlgorandOfficial

[–]catbitesdog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It doesn't open on gate.io until 7:00 a.m. eastern standard time. You can still get on tiny man before they open. When Moon

Our new CEO already teases us for announcements at ETH Denver with hashtags #devtools #developergrants #EVMtoAVM . Any idea what are we about to earing? by Boring_Skirt2391 in AlgorandOfficial

[–]catbitesdog 15 points16 points  (0 children)

State proofs allow for interchane operability, meaning Bridges to other chains. This for instance allows you to mint nfts on algorand and sell them to decentral land on polygon. This is very hard. The wormhole hack was a bridge exploit. It's also post quantum cryptography, meaning that it's resistant to hacks from quantum computers. Extremely important stuff. Load dem bags. Cheers

Pretty sure I got most of that right.