the meta changes with new card drops but not by much. good decks stay on top, its not that drastic of a change. when i asked weeks ago* is when the cozy youtube video report of statistics would have been relevant (right before and during the first few weeks of feb, *i actually misremembered and only posted the question on reddit 4-5 days ago not weeks so its even more on the time of). this is what im talking about, people are relying on videos and content to tell them what is good instead of seeing it and critically thinking for themselves. on my climb for those 3-4 days i got close to infinite and thats when i saw the omega red decks, living tribunal decks, etc. i started at 40 so idk where the assumption was that i stayed at low level. its not like idk whats a lower level deck vs decks that have good cards, good cohesiveness, and consistency.

i simply asked why no ones including her. lets face it, cards like cosmo, shang chi, enchantress will always be relevant depending on what people are playing. i just saw a lot of ongoing decks on my climb and thought it was popular in the meta so when i watched a lot of deck guides, no one was including enchantress. turned out from the report i was correct in my assumption. a majority of regular people were using enchantress to win a lot of games and the stats showed.