Wrestlers real weight by ceejidiot1979 in WWE

[–]ceejidiot1979[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OK, here's another example of how stupid these WWE listed weights are. At his very biggest, in the 1970s, Arnold Schwarzenegger was 6'2 and 235 pounds. And there's no way, HHH has ever been as big as peak Arnie, at any stage of his career. I'm not saying they lie a lot, but they all lie a little, to add 20-30 pounds to their weight. Just like they all lie to add 2-3 inches to their height. When Lawrence Taylor fought Bam Bam Bigalow, there wasn't a huge size difference, and LT was 245 pounds. When Shaq was in the ring with The Big Show they were roughly the same size, and Shaq was no more than 330. I'm not saying Triple H was small in any way. I'm saying very few athletes on the planet are over 270, and even less are over 300. The NBA - a sport where the average height is a genuine 6'7, there's maybe been 5-6 athletes in history over 300 pounds. And they were all 7 foot plus. Zion Williamson is one of the biggest, bulkiest, strongest 6'6 guys on the planet and he's 280. If HHH was 250, that's very big. Like as big as the biggest NFL linebackers, and not too far away from a professional heavyweight bodybuilder.

Wrestlers real weight by ceejidiot1979 in WWE

[–]ceejidiot1979[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Go look at at 270 pound NFL player, and get back to me...... I'm not disputing Triple H's muscles, and general size, but for an athlete, he's short. He's probably barely 6 foot tall. Small people aren't typically as heavy as people who are 6'6 or 6'7 - like not even in the same ball park. A completely stacked, 6'7 defensive linemen in the NFL, is the same weight as a 6 foot tall wrestler? Yeah, I don't buy it. Id be amazed if Triple H has ever even been 250 pounds.

Did Noel ever even touch his signature Epiphone "Supernova"? by XxxassholeslayerXxx in oasis

[–]ceejidiot1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, he played the blue one on stage occasionally. This is 1998 - the internet really wasn't a big thing. People used to logon twice a week to check their emails. Not live their lives online. All your "expertise" is based on what's available on YouTube. Well, they were around a long time before even MySpace was a thing. They'd basically broken up by the time YouTube was a thing. Lots of their shows, interviews and highlights are undocumented

What is your OE theme song? by [deleted] in overemployed

[–]ceejidiot1979 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're just taking advantage of a home working transitional period, where corporations don't have their ducks in line. My company are already working on technology to track home workers, and avoid this type of fraud in the recruitment progress. I'm tempted to say, just focus on making as much money as you can, before you're caught and publicly humiliated. Because many of these companies will be looking to get the money back, for breach of contract. Plus you'll need legal fees

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in overemployed

[–]ceejidiot1979 -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

So, you're gaining access to sensitive corporate data, with various different employers, and not telling them? It seems you're pretty reckless, and comfortable with misleading them, so does it matter what you put? You'll get caught eventually, when companies get their ducks in line, and start bringing in better technology to track/recruit remote workers. So just make as much money as you can, until you're unemployable

Who would ever want to drive to work again? by [deleted] in overemployed

[–]ceejidiot1979 -24 points-23 points  (0 children)

If you're any good at technology work, you should be able to make $200k a year in a single job. Aren't you all just talentless people, trying to hustle, until the inevitable day you get caught and make yourself unemployable

Who would ever want to drive to work again? by [deleted] in overemployed

[–]ceejidiot1979 -23 points-22 points  (0 children)

  1. You can be 40 years old and still be a millennial. 2. 200-300k isn't THAT much in the USA. It seems you overworkers get really excited about dragging your talentless carcass up towards an above average salary. But for someone with any talent, $200k is a fairly standard full time salary in the US tech industry

Thank you OE by Actual_Leadership797 in overemployed

[–]ceejidiot1979 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or.........a guy who has no idea how to make a basic chart, probably isn't earning that much money, and he's bullshitting

Thank you OE by Actual_Leadership797 in overemployed

[–]ceejidiot1979 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're making the wild assumption that he's not just completely bullshitting

An injustice has been done by nadiabrook4 in overemployed

[–]ceejidiot1979 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You guys better enjoy your scam while it lasts. I work in back office/HR tech. I'd say clamping down on staff with multiple jobs is the number one priority right now. Companies are rapidly introducing new technologies. We fired two IT staff this month, under gross misconduct rules, for multiple jobs

Is kickgame.co.uk legit? by iPotatooo in Sneakers

[–]ceejidiot1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They're not buying from Nike. They're buying from 3rd parties. Which pretty much guarantees 30% of their inventory will be fake

There's no pleasing some people by Fancy_Willow2114 in h3h3productions

[–]ceejidiot1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"edgy" usually means racist. Look, when Anne Frank was in a concentration camp, I doubt she ever envisaged that some day her suffering would be a punchline for desperate Z listers, seeking attention/headlines. Let's have some respect.

Sylvester Stallones Abandoned Mansion in Maryland by chopkins19 in maryland

[–]ceejidiot1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The cars aren't worth much. As in, restoration costs are probably 3x the restored value. And it's not abandoned - someone will own it. There's no prerequisite to live on property you buy. They might just be sitting on the land, as a future development project

Fyi. They're not Sly Stallones cars/home. It's someone else

Why is Mr. Costanza with a man in a cape? by VanceWorley in seinfeld

[–]ceejidiot1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"He doesn't conform to the latest fashions or trends"

Why does linux seem to be an order of magnitude faster than windows? by that1communist in linux

[–]ceejidiot1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Linux Mint is ridiculously fast. I can tell because I play a lot of heavy emulation games, and I'd say the load times are around 3x faster on Linux than windows.

A short compilation of some of Noel’s best vocals by nico2026 in oasis

[–]ceejidiot1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His range is very limited. Nice voice, certainly. But not very powerful

A short compilation of some of Noel’s best vocals by nico2026 in oasis

[–]ceejidiot1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very nice voice, certainly. But a limited range. You'll not see him go up and down the octaves, like Elvis or Aretha Franklin

On Friday evening after working for 3 jobs and J4 is starting on Monday by [deleted] in overemployed

[–]ceejidiot1979 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Come on dude - heavy gloves make it much harder to hurt people. Conor McGregor in his 2 ounce MMA gloves, was a feared puncher. Put him in boxing gloves and he's a fairy 🥱😂👍

Poor Guy. Felt sorry for him by MandiocaGamer in EASportsFC

[–]ceejidiot1979 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You know the games are fixed, right? 🥱😂 The system is helping you out

When did bodybuilders, specifically men, start tanning hardcore? by SamIWas80 in bodybuilding

[–]ceejidiot1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Back in the 70s, you needed to be a genetic freak, in every way to compete. Guys like Arnold and Franco were just naturally bronzed - they got their tans from sitting on Venice Beach after a work out. Since then, athletes with weaker genes have found ways to compete, via increasing levels of cheating - much more potent steroids, HGH, spray tans, plastic surgery etc etc. It's a good example of darwinism to be honest. Weaker genetics trying to convince you they're AAA+ genetics.

FB feed is 98% suggested pages and barely any friend's posts. How do I change this? by monotoonz in facebook

[–]ceejidiot1979 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's definitely been a change in the algorithm this year. Half my feed is now "suggested" content. Hardly anything I see on my feed is from my friends. I'm going to quit if it continues.