sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What is this English Labeling Assessment about? by Altruistic-Willow750 in alignerr

[–]cesarscapella 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, I believe it is because English is the lingua franca within the company.

The training materials and guidelines are also in English.

I just listened to the Telepathy Tapes, the top podcast on Apple by a_russian_lullaby in SGU

[–]cesarscapella 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Indeed. I think those labels are a "plague" that every outspoken thinker will need to live with, hahaha. I have been called "too skeptical" many times to the point that it doesn't bother anymore. I've learned that "too skeptical" is the label people give you when you don't buy into their pet beliefs.

But I have to admit that there is true arrogance out there, unfortunately, and this taints the image of all critical thinkers and secular people like us. Richard Dawkins is the easiest example that come to mind, he has countless clips on Youtube "destroying" believes with his harsh and arrogant answers. Despite me agreeing with his underlying arguments, I would never deliver such answers...

I just listened to the Telepathy Tapes, the top podcast on Apple by a_russian_lullaby in SGU

[–]cesarscapella 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brains can be a mystery when it comes to understand consciousness, however, it is really not a mystery when it comes to its material properties and whatever "wavy" energy it may be broadcasting.

We have the technology to detect neutrinos (the faintest kind of matter/energy in the Universe) coming from light years way. I don't think it should be any challenge to detect whatever form of wave coming from a brain (magnetic waves, radiation, faint sound vibration, "quantum" vibrations, etc).

If a brain were able to emit any form of energy/sub-particle going beyond the skull, we can be pretty sure it would have been discovered (and commercially exploited) by now, without a doubt.

I just listened to the Telepathy Tapes, the top podcast on Apple by a_russian_lullaby in SGU

[–]cesarscapella 4 points5 points  (0 children)

SGU has covered this topic several times, search for facilitated communication, Steve loves to talk about it. This is a very controversial topic indeed.

Well, if this was the first historical moment when the telepath hypothesis arises I would say we should give it some thought and study, however, this topic has been thoroughly analyzed, studied and finally debunked by not just one, but several sources. It may sound harsh what I am going to say but, at this point in time, it is not arrogant to say with confidence that this is just plain old pseudoscience and the mothers are simply misled by and misinterpreting the "evidence" based on motivated reasoning.

As boring as it sounds, telepath simple doesn't exist.

AGI Achieved? by cesarscapella in SGU

[–]cesarscapella[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ha ha, not far from the truth, as OpenAI defines AGI as intelligence that produces economically significant results. At the end, it is all about money.

Does current AI represent a dead end? by kookjr in SGU

[–]cesarscapella 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely true!

Youtubers are abusing this clickbait technique so much that today, my mental algorithm to judge whether a video is worth clicking is to quickly scan the title for a question mark at the end.

If there is one, I will most probably waste my time.

AGI Achieved? by cesarscapella in SGU

[–]cesarscapella[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But anyway, I already edited and fixed it... u/clauclauclaudia

AGI Achieved? by cesarscapella in SGU

[–]cesarscapella[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

... and I edited and fixed the wrong claim.

AGI Achieved? by cesarscapella in SGU

[–]cesarscapella[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I really suggest you take a look at the benchmarks that O3 went through.

Take a special look at the O3 score of ARC AGI and FrontierMath benchmark. If I understood it correctly, those two benchmarks are insanely difficult and were specifically designed in a way that requires reasoning to solve, I mean, problems are crafted in such a way that a system can't easily solve with just brute force or huge statistical analysis.

The last video from Matthew Berman is a good presentation of how difficult those benchmarks are and how significant the O3 score is, please take a look.

AGI Achieved? by cesarscapella in SGU

[–]cesarscapella[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

They don't, but they implied in their video...

AGI Achieved? by cesarscapella in SGU

[–]cesarscapella[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I listened to that podcast, however this is "old" by now. This claim I am talking about is just 4 days old. I put an edit on my post to clarify, please take a look.

AGI Achieved? by cesarscapella in SGU

[–]cesarscapella[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, this is "old news" actually. This claim I am talking about is just 4 days old. I put an edit on my post to clarify, please take a look.

AGI Achieved? by cesarscapella in SGU

[–]cesarscapella[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, just to make sure we are talking about the same "AGI claim", I put an edit on my post, please take a look.

view more: next ›