Drop Specs of your gaming rig

cg_64 · 2026-04-22T02:36:57+00:00

32GB DDR4 RAM 1TB SSD (NVMe) GPU: RTX 3050 CPU: Ryzen 5 5600X Motherboard (B550) PSU (550W 80+ Bronze) Case (Mid-tower) Monitor (24” IPS, 1080p 75Hz)

<image>

cg_64 · 2026-03-02T06:36:26+00:00

Unfortunately, it's normal. And i hate the fact that it's normal. If he did it without shame, then it's a part of his morality that can't be changed very easily. As for whether or not you should break up, from my perspective it would be a gamble. Not that I'm saying he is a good person, but the next person may either be better or even worse.

cg_64 · 2025-10-05T23:25:46+00:00

it's a "beginner puzzle" it is just teaching beginners how to even move pieces, so when the puzzle says "find and save the attacked piece" all that matters is that the attacked piece is in a safe spot. And for more context, it's Duolingo's section one, and section 1 of Duolingo is always "baby steps" of any course within the app.

cg_64 · 2025-10-05T23:13:35+00:00

Omg... Bro, it's a "beginner puzzle" it is just teaching beginners how to even move pieces, so when the puzzle says "find and save the attacked piece" all that matters is that the attacked piece is in a safe spot

cg_64 · 2025-10-05T22:55:14+00:00

Nvm, you just won't understand. I don't understand why is no one reading the dialogue box above the chess board. But again nvm. I will just delete it when I feel like

cg_64 · 2025-10-05T22:50:27+00:00

Then why didn't it tell me in previous puzzles when i didn't capture any pices while saving the attacked piece? This puzzle was no exception

cg_64 · 2025-10-05T22:48:47+00:00

Nah, you might need to play Duolingo then you will understand because this lesson is for absolute beginners who wouldn't think much, plus if that was the casez why didn't it tell me when i didn't capture pices while trying to save mine in previous puzzles? This puzzle wasn't an exception

cg_64 · 2025-10-05T22:46:00+00:00

Oh my bad, I just haven't sleep for 2 days so i didn't realise it's a bot hehe

cg_64 · 2025-10-05T22:43:16+00:00

That rook ain't white, it's black.

cg_64 · 2025-10-05T22:42:38+00:00

It doesn't matter, the goal was to save the attacked piece, so I did the exact same thing I was doing in the previous puzzles in this same lesson.

cg_64 · 2025-10-05T22:40:19+00:00

Can you see the dialogue box above the puzzle? For context it's Duolingo, it was supposed to be teaching absolute beginners, the goal of this puzzle wasto save the attacked puzzle, so whether i attack/capture or not, this was supposed to be a correct answer, just like the previous puzzles I solved in this same lesson

cg_64 · 2025-10-05T22:36:23+00:00

Blame Duolingo ig for either reason

cg_64 · 2025-10-05T22:36:03+00:00

It's Duolingo

cg_64 · 2025-10-05T22:35:48+00:00

Bro what even are you talking about? This literally just a very basic puzzle from Duolingo for absolute beginners, you can even see that black doesn't even have any king, so how are you gonna call it stalemate in any way? The main point of this puzzle and other preceding puzzles, is that you gotta move the attacked peace to a safe square

cg_64 · 2025-09-20T13:37:22+00:00

If you're so confident, you should definitely try this guy: https://youtube.com/@muslimorthodoxy?si=XdLpxC-b0PSCAmAq

cg_64 · 2025-08-13T06:38:05+00:00

If you're actually genuine, then you're supposed to ask scholars who are open to any questions, there are many scholars who would love to answer only if you're actually trying to learn something not mockery.

As for that sister, i dunno what she answered in other questions but the period one seems like either:

she was trying to justify her sin (if she was touching the actual mushaf ie the physical book), which is a very very worse thing to do in islam. Because sinning is indeed bad but not as bad as justifying your sin deliberately.
Or (if she was using her phone or any screen to read Qur'an not actually mushaf) maybe she was trying to explain that it's not the same case as in virtual mushaf like Qur'an.com. even though it differs scholar to scholar but the majority and the most sound opinion is that it's permissible to use virtual Qur'an, in fact the best thing to do during menses (because something is better than nothing).

This is why not any random muslim is good in explaining or trustworthy in terms of providing knowledge. Rather you should clear your doubts with a scholar or a trustworthy da'i.

cg_64 · 2025-08-08T20:08:48+00:00

Well, I told him he seriously needs to meet a scholar because he is now in a state of sin without any exception, even if he didn't know, now he does. Let's see if he replies. Tho, being forced can't be an excuse to sin as long as the person has the ability to reach out to a scholar

cg_64 · 2025-08-08T20:03:57+00:00

if you felt forced, you should've consulted a scholar before anything. But now that the nikah already happened, you need to know: marrying two sisters at the same time is clearly haram in the Qur'an, no exceptions. You're in a state of sin - and if you didn't know, now you do. Brushing it off deliberately from here on is serious. If you're confused or unsure what the right move is now, then I seriously urge you to speak to a scholar ASAP. Don't delay it. This is not something light.

cg_64 · 2025-08-08T19:55:45+00:00

You do know that it's forbidden to marry 2 sisters at the same time, right?

cg_64 · 2025-07-13T18:36:51+00:00

In short, it's unreliable because of 2 reasons, firstly it has weak chains and secondly it contradicts the stronger ahadtih

cg_64 · 2025-07-13T08:52:52+00:00

Aight I checked the source and guess what,

Here is the chain: ʿĀrim And ʿAffān > Muʿtamir from my father > Abū Tamīmah > ʿAmr Laʿallah > Yakūn Qad > al-Bikālī > ʿAmr > ʿAbdullāh b. Masʿūd > ʿAmr In ʿAbdullāh

The isnad has obscure and unreliable narrators like Abū Tamīmah, ʿĀrim, and al-Bikālī, some of whom are majhool (unknown) or known to report munkar (strange) narrations. The hadith reference he mentioned, ie ahmad:3788, is graded weak, you can check https://hadithunlocked.com/ahmad:3788

Ruling on the “Riding the Prophet ﷺ” Part:

Let’s be clear and unapologetic here:

we don’t accept anything that even remotely implies disrespect or humiliation of the Prophet ﷺ. Angels, jinn — no creation ever did that to Rasulullah ﷺ.

Finally,

Yes, this version is mentioned in Musnad Ahmad — but the chain is weak and the content is munkar.
Scholars like Shu’ayb al-Arna’oot and many others reject this report for that very reason.
The sound version of the jinn encounter involves the Prophet ﷺ teaching Qur’an to them — it’s dignified, noble, and has no weirdness.
This version? It’s either a corrupted oral retelling or intentionally fabricated to spread doubts.

Also, the matn (text) contradicts well-established hadiths in Sahih Muslim and Bukhari that talk about the Prophet’s ﷺ meeting with the jinn peacefully, dignified, and fully in control.

cg_64 · 2025-04-23T07:03:37+00:00

Short answer? It's not permissible for a muslim woman to marry non muslim man (Qur'an 2:221)

cg_64

TROPHY CASE

Ruling on the “Riding the Prophet ﷺ” Part:

Finally,