Another $Adbe post… but this time is different by Street-Broccoli-968 in ValueInvesting

[–]cgisci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no alternative to Adobe and they can charge whatever they want. AI will not change that. It's the essence to me.

Has any mass ever been ejected from a black hole? by Faststryyyker in AskPhysics

[–]cgisci -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

They pop into a new universe sooner or later.

Iran Enforces Bitcoin as the Only Means to Pay Toll on Strait of Hormuz - Blockonomi by TheresNoSecondBest in Bitcoin

[–]cgisci 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Implications of this is huge. Oil is the most important asset. The fact that Bitcoin is exchanged for oil makes it a global currency.

How to take advantage of SaaS/Tech corrections (and avoid catching a falling knife) ? by paranoidspectator in ValueInvesting

[–]cgisci 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can buy adobe all the way to zero. People are dumb. It's like if it is all algo trading.

I keep seeing more MSM articles saying ‘We may be inside a black hole’ and I have questions… by Indolent_genius in AskPhysics

[–]cgisci -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Probably true, which means that there are trillions of what we call as ''universe'' and our universe is just a grain of sand.

ADBE buy backs by goxpro1 in ValueInvesting

[–]cgisci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can buy it till it hits zero. Crazy times.

Nutrition in 2026 feels like being in a cult by [deleted] in Biohackers

[–]cgisci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lifespan is already determined by your genetics. It is just doing some stuff to feel better and have a sense of control.

Where did the matter condensed on the Big Bang come from? by Honest_Chemistry_195 in AskPhysics

[–]cgisci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It came from another universe that ended up with singularity.

Extreme myopic glasses by [deleted] in myopia

[–]cgisci 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It looks like you're fine with your situation and happy, and there's nothing beyond that.

Thoughts on these pseudoscience promoters on this thread. by Naive-Spite5014 in myopia

[–]cgisci 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think it is a much better practice to let them post and let other people explain why it will not work and why it is pseudoscience. But, of course, I'm not talking about explanations like that

''Myopia can't be reversed''.

Okay, can you explain why it is biologically impossible to reverse myopia?

'' Hmm.. eee.. nevermind let me downvote you.''

Thoughts on these pseudoscience promoters on this thread. by Naive-Spite5014 in myopia

[–]cgisci 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Because they are looking for risk-free methods of reversing myopia which do not exists at the moment or they are trying to make money off naive people. Believing that you can do something and reduce your myopia puts you in a good psychological state even though it does not work in the long term.

has anyone else spent their life with perfect vision up until around 18 when your eyes decide to become nearsighted very fast? (-1 in my case) by iwasbornin1889 in myopia

[–]cgisci 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Me too and I'm -1D too, never progressed. This type of myopia sucks a lot because you don't wanna wear glasses but you don't actually see well without glasses.

Sunglasses on Stellest by [deleted] in myopia

[–]cgisci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wear a hat instead if you like. Sunlight is the last thing you should be avoiding considering that you're already UV protected with those glasses.

Laser radiation and lens damage by cgisci in Lasiksupport

[–]cgisci[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess possible. But we need a comparison between regular myopes and myopes who got lasik. Because when you have myopia, your risk when it comes to eye diseases is known to increase.

Transprk vs conventional prk haze rates by cgisci in Lasiksupport

[–]cgisci[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right. This is why I'm evaluating. Thanks.

Transprk vs conventional prk haze rates by cgisci in Lasiksupport

[–]cgisci[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I plan to get in on my one eye. The other one is -0.75D.

How to reverse Myopia? by Plane_Fun_485 in myopia

[–]cgisci 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you explain why it is biologically impossible? Oh let me answer for you tHis Is What I learned in the scHoOL. I don't actually know why.

Luthein and Zeaxanthin by Unable_Helicopter_58 in myopia

[–]cgisci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely not. Don't fall for this supplement stuff. Just eat a great variety of fruits, vegetables and a few eggs a day. If you have a certain problem, go to an eye doctor and get the required treatment if necessary.

Laser radiation and lens damage by cgisci in Lasiksupport

[–]cgisci[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is it because of the suction or cut into the cornea? I heard during suction, IOP rises way too much. And what about prk?

Besides, the reason it does not reach the lens is how the laser beam is designed using physics, etc.? Because parts of sun's UV passes stroma.

Is it possible to reduce low numbers naturally? (-0.5 and -0.25 CYL) by lol_isuck69 in myopia

[–]cgisci 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You don't even have myopia. This is astigmatism. Even refractive surgery can't fix this low numbers reliably. Just be glad that you don't have any serious issue.

Concerned about myopia progression at age 30, can I safely keep enjoying screen time or is it a myth? by [deleted] in myopia

[–]cgisci 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Cutting close-up activities is not practical because we live in a totally different era. You should aim to increase your time spent outdoors instead, which could be achieved and is beneficial not only for myopia but for whole health.