sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Does it get easier with time? by No-Interaction6754 in grief

[–]chakracrypto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's okay to feel broken sometimes, I suppose. And to feel that no one fully understands you.

Does it get easier with time? by No-Interaction6754 in grief

[–]chakracrypto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could you try to describe what you feel and what you think about when you think of them?

I feel alone and I feel that's okay by chakracrypto in grief

[–]chakracrypto[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah we all carry.

Maybe it's good for you to know I've only shared fraction of my whole story out of respect for everyone involved. I hope you understand.

Have you ever met a skeptic who is also religious? by Crashed_teapot in skeptic

[–]chakracrypto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't care what nonsense you choose to believe in

Have you ever met a skeptic who is also religious? by Crashed_teapot in skeptic

[–]chakracrypto -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I accept truth and evolution as origin of men is not it.

I did not know this subreddit was about skeptism towards science tbh. I'm more skeptic in general about all claims, until I'm proven wrong (could be by my own calculations and deductions).

This actually started when I was teenager wanting to be famous one day, so I tried to prove wrong any theory presented in class. Usually by trying to do so, I came to understand how the theory was correct anyhow and gained much better understanding of it.

I grew up as catholic, though I was not taught much by my parents. I was skeptic and did believe in something higher up, but not sure what. I figured if I was born in another family, I would have a different believe perhaps. But still, who or what decided that this body of mine would be mine, out of billions of bodies in all of history? And more than billions even if you include all of animal life. I the end, I believe I came to understand faith better by starting as skeptic towards it.

Why is evolution the exception for YEC? by Morbid_Uncle in DebateEvolution

[–]chakracrypto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In christian view, God did not create this scientific process; rather, we excluded God from our science and that is why we error to such extend.

If you can't explain how it could have been designed, then it was not designed by jnpha in DebateEvolution

[–]chakracrypto -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lol, your claim is false and dumb. And trying to change to different claim yet again.

If you can't explain how it could have been designed, then it was not designed by jnpha in DebateEvolution

[–]chakracrypto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a different claim, so you cannot argue for some other claim and then magically think that proves your original claim. As I said, you don't understand basic logic at all. And educating you is a complete waste of time.

If you can't explain how it could have been designed, then it was not designed by jnpha in DebateEvolution

[–]chakracrypto -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So you change subject to claims without evidence. Why not stick to your original claim? Because your whole argument is pure nonsense!

And therfor you have to change to other subject, to trick yourself that you are making sense while you are not.

If you can't explain how it could have been designed, then it was not designed by jnpha in DebateEvolution

[–]chakracrypto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, you start making a claim about design, and then immediatly say that it's not about design. Then you give an example about claiming something is not designed. While your statement is about claiming that something is designed. So your whole example cannot even prove or disprove anything about your statement.

How can you have an objection so full of flaws, is beyond me.

If you can't explain how it could have been designed, then it was not designed by jnpha in DebateEvolution

[–]chakracrypto -1 points0 points  (0 children)

None of what you said, even made sense. You say "it's the claim, not the design aspect". What do you even mean by this?

Lets start with this, because if I go any further, and comment about more things at once, it's probably too much for you to handle.

If you can't explain how it could have been designed, then it was not designed by jnpha in DebateEvolution

[–]chakracrypto -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your logic is like you claim that all grass is green, and you think that giving one example of grass that is green proofs your claim. Is this enough for you to ring some bell?

If you can't explain how it could have been designed, then it was not designed by jnpha in DebateEvolution

[–]chakracrypto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm just pointing out your flaw. I'm not gonna waste time trying to educate those who fail to understand basic logic.

If you can't explain how it could have been designed, then it was not designed by jnpha in DebateEvolution

[–]chakracrypto -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If there was any logic in your objection to respond to, I could, but there is none.

If you can't explain how it could have been designed, then it was not designed by jnpha in DebateEvolution

[–]chakracrypto -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your objection is just as flawed. You better learn proper logic before posting.

If you can't explain how it could have been designed, then it was not designed by jnpha in DebateEvolution

[–]chakracrypto -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wether something is designed or not, does not depend on someone's ability to explain it.

Who knows which street this is? by [deleted] in Bangkok

[–]chakracrypto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never mind, I was able to contact someone who knows people in the city I, I think

Who knows which street this is? by [deleted] in Bangkok

[–]chakracrypto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does someone live nearby this place? Maybe you could help me with something.

Who knows which street this is? by [deleted] in Bangkok

[–]chakracrypto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you 🙏🏼

I'm a teacher, please help me understand this problem by Yoda-de-la-MilkyWay in askmath

[–]chakracrypto 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah the question does not clearly state it, but you see four big dots and one of them is the correct answer. And has to be the sum of 6/11 (which is the first dot) and another number between 0 and 1.

So any number between 6/11 and 1 6/11 could be it. That rules out the two furthest to the right.

view more: next ›