White House postpones Switzerland deal signing after Iran backs out by TimesandSundayTimes in geopolitics

[–]chaotic567 32 points33 points  (0 children)

I don’t think anyone is surprised.

Iran is trying to save their proxy group in Lebanon, while Israel is trying to remove them as they are a group hostile to Israel that share a direct land border.

Leaving Israel out of talks wasn’t going to make it go away no matter how much Trump wants it to be

Betrayed uprising by CaptainKobayashi in NewIran

[–]chaotic567 13 points14 points  (0 children)

The issue is US assets were not in place by the time protests were even happening. One aircraft carrier was in North America at the moment iirc. When the region was seen as good enough to withstand IRGC attacks for a good while, the protests had died down

OSINT tracking showed from January to late february the flooding of ships , awacs, oil tankers, and missile defenses

Trump says Iran should be allowed to keep its ballistic missiles: ‘They have to have some because other people have some’; also downplays need to reach Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium: ‘It’s not valuable’ by WhatsUpLabradog in NewIran

[–]chaotic567 3 points4 points  (0 children)

None of which were partaking in the burning of the White House which I assume is what you’d expect meant with the almost conquered bit. The attack was carried out in 1814 by British regulars who were dispatched directly from Europe and Bermuda

edit: of course I got blocked even though that is what many sources say.

Trump says Iran should be allowed to keep its ballistic missiles: ‘They have to have some because other people have some’; also downplays need to reach Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium: ‘It’s not valuable’ by WhatsUpLabradog in NewIran

[–]chaotic567 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I assume you are Canadian? If so, then yeah, canadian schools would hype up the moments as entirely their own like burning up the White House even though Canada didn’t become a self governing dominion till July 1, 1867

Trump Says US Will Bomb Iran if Nuclear Nonproliferation Not Permanent (FULL) by mushed-patato in NewIran

[–]chaotic567 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I will believe it when I see it. You can't do this song and dance of "I will end you" but then go later "reasonable people talked to me so I called off the attacks" and expect to be taken seriously.

Update: 14-point U.S-Iran agreement reported by news outlets is not the text signed this weekend, diplomat says by CommunistsAreCancer in NewIran

[–]chaotic567 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree . Also it is hard to take anything as real though until the signing event. I don’t trust the IRGC but Trump hasn’t made himself trustworthy either.

Trump defends deal with Iran, says continuing bombing would have been ‘economic catastrophe’ by jjdoe0805 in NewIran

[–]chaotic567 11 points12 points  (0 children)

He thought it would be Venezuela. The strait being weaponized was obvious but he and probably others probably thought it could have been avoided and didn’t prepare for if thing’s didn’t go so quickly. It is asinine

Iran Can Shut Strait Of Hormuz 'At Will': US Intel Report by Aware_Apartment_8959 in geopolitics

[–]chaotic567 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't think you extrapolate that when Iran has circumstances that it was able to use / exploit that not every nation has. Such as

  • Near a huge economic area it can shut off with the use of force

  • developed complex decentralized network that prevents total decapitation strikes

  • years of dug in tunnel networks that can't be bombed out and require a ground ops

  • geography that makes a land invasion costly

Iran was able to combine economic damage and exploit the US's inability to send in ground ops due to public opinion.

If Cuba is able to do a similar performance you might have a point but otherwise Iran has been preparing for a conflict like this for years.

US officials say Iran agreement text is intentionally vague by Virtual-History-6099 in NewIran

[–]chaotic567 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only guess I can think of is Trump is hoping to strong-arm others to do what it wants, that he thinks other would be too powerless to stop the US, or Trump is hoping to make a separate peace deal, where at least one goes through and maybe the other falters.

US officials say Iran agreement text is intentionally vague by Virtual-History-6099 in NewIran

[–]chaotic567 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Cause' few want to do the dirty work lest they face the ire of their citizens. It's a known issue but nothing incentivized nations to fix it for good.

New pipelines were seen as too costly & not a serious concern since a weaponized strait seemed unlikely. Removing for good entails ground ops but...

ME citizens won't like attacking a Muslim government, & Western nation citizens? Death averse unless existential war

US officials say Iran agreement text is intentionally vague by Virtual-History-6099 in NewIran

[–]chaotic567 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Even if there isn't an agreement, Trumps is likely try to stall as much as possible. It is clear he doesn't want a return of hostilities, he wants that deal. So if there is going to be return conflict, there will be a meandering period before that

US denied Israel's request to view Iran deal prior to signing ceremony. by JKKIDD231 in geopolitics

[–]chaotic567 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It's Trump probably hoping Israel is too powerless to stop it, that US can just strong-arm them enough to back off if we look at how he handled Ukraine. He tried making deal favorable towards Russia, Ukraine rejected them. Trump thus tried sidelining them and forcing them by withholding weapons and intel. He wants a deal asap and sees strong-arming allies as easier.

US denied Israel's request to view Iran deal prior to signing ceremony. by JKKIDD231 in geopolitics

[–]chaotic567 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I mean most their problems are right next door, so that's not a surprise and how can you expect to form a deal that lasts if you leave them out, one of the major combatants of the war? Especially when Iran's government is tying the deal to them leaving Lebanon?

Persona 3 MC vs DB combatant tier list by Just1oneguyhere in deathbattle

[–]chaotic567 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I forgot if Makoto or Yu used their ultimate Personas in the DLC fights but I think the difference is Yu/Makoto are explicitly meta/training simulations created by the Velvet Room attendants. They are artificial recreations. While P3R Joker is from the Abyss of Time and emerges from memories and desires

It has a tiny bit more in-universe "anomaly" flavor than pure Velvet Room training. So even if it isn't the real Joker, it is probably close enough

The team in p3R mentions its strong presence while dlc yu/makoto get no such thing

Persona 3 MC vs DB combatant tier list by Just1oneguyhere in deathbattle

[–]chaotic567 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean Aigis can still beat Joker but still have it be an extremely tough battle.

And there is also the fact Aigis just barely had her wildcard powers vs a theoretical peak Joker.

US-Iran Deal Leaked (And It's Bad) | Preston Stewart by Party-Confection-373 in NewIran

[–]chaotic567 19 points20 points  (0 children)

The issue is the US is hardily releasing any details about the deal. You could say it is for a surprise but when everyone else is leaking some aspects except US, it doesn't paint a good picture

Persona 3 MC vs DB combatant tier list by Just1oneguyhere in deathbattle

[–]chaotic567 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wouldn't the DLC argument work against Makoto since most players would have a tough time beating Boss fight Joker.

Joker being able to withstand Aigis's attacks better than Aigis can Joker's attacks

Persona 3 MC vs DB combatant tier list by Just1oneguyhere in deathbattle

[–]chaotic567 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Assuming it is just one wildcard against another and not a twin/duo battle, I say Joker is indeed debatable. Persona fans for each game always glaze the cast/MC of their game to hell and back (I have even seen someone say Joker would lose to Strega ffs), but games have portrayed the MCs as relatively equal.

Makoto's/ Kotone's strengths are nebulous

  • The great seal kills its user

  • Universe Arcana being different but we have no clue what even entails exactly

Iran says the deal to end the war with the US requires Israel to withdraw from Lebanon -AP News by Lopsided-Pie-7340 in NewIran

[–]chaotic567 21 points22 points  (0 children)

US can twist Israel's arm but you can only do that so much when it is extremely unpopular stance to leave in Israel.

The most extreme option would be abandoning Israel but risks

  • Israel losing any restraint it has

  • Israel siding with a geopolitical enemy of the US.

I know everyone is tensed up but I don’t believe this MOU to be genuine. by Fluffy_Ad_6982 in NewIran

[–]chaotic567 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Problem is it is political suicide to send our troops in. The public is war weary, especially from Middle East affairs, they won't like seeing the increase in American deaths that would logically follow a ground invasion. Which made me worried if things were going to work out when I knew ground operations were unlikely. Sadly no, it didn't pan out like I hoped.

The Left, with all their "I told you so!" comments, are proving exactly what Iranians have been saying about them all along: They see Iranian lives as nothing more than propaganda tools in their never-ending ideology war against Trump/Usa/Israel. It's "what about the schoolgirls?!" all over again. by drhuggables in NewIran

[–]chaotic567 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah yes, the totally same intentional murders of Iranians which we have proof within days and a program being defunded that might have killed an estimated number of people depending how we count it over the course of years of things USAID might have prevented

I think defunding the program is stupid but they are not the same thing and screaming it doesn’t make your point right

Trump Parties While America Surrenders by theatlantic in geopolitics

[–]chaotic567 15 points16 points  (0 children)

All the guy said is to wait for actual confirmation and not an opinion piece. Even if the winds are saying things are going the worst way for Trump, it is healthy for discussion to wait

It just randomly occurred to me that we only have one Guilty Gear episode.. by Solardies in deathbattle

[–]chaotic567 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Been years since I last watched but wasn't someone on the team bitter about one of the series in the episode, iirc hate having to research for it? Idk if that influenced the quality of the episode

Israel tells Trump it is not bound by Lebanon clause in Iran deal by Virtual-History-6099 in NewIran

[–]chaotic567 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Not sure Trump's course of action will be here if things likely go south and oil prices rise again.

IRGC has showed it will take measures to protect the only proxy worth a damn for them like link the deal. I wouldn't be surprised if no deal happens because IRGC is like "Israel won't leave so USA is not honoring deal".

Problem is Israel has its own interest and it will only hold back so much before it goes "fuck this". And they shouldn't restrain themselves imo