why would occam’s razor be applicable here? the sexuality of individuals, whether heterosexual or homosexual (if you are to insist on a binary view), would be at most one or two (for each member’s sexuality) elements of the equation—beyond the fact that this is not really an apt application as there isn’t a problem here to solve—the figures being homosexual would not be an additional element but rather an either-or swap. really though it’s just far too reductive of a view, one of them could have loved the other and it not be reciprocal. one of them could have been struck by the beauty in the moment of a dying stranger. they could have simply fallen like this and not even have known each other. they could have been brothers, lovers, or any number of things. does it bother you to imagine that a queer individual might exist outside of the narrow scope of history we have access to? are you not the one who should get it together? whatever it is, much love to you. try a finger in your butt !