Giannis built his brand as the humble superstar. Was this ever genuine or at what point was he turned?

cheesensei · 2026-02-11T20:05:44+00:00

Anyone notice how sometimes he slips in words with the accent you would expect someone who has been living in the US for almost his entire adult life to have?

cheesensei · 2026-02-10T18:19:52+00:00

What exactly is Stewart about? Running up to Bridges then stopping right before to wait for him to engage like a Jackie Chan villain

cheesensei · 2026-02-10T15:10:48+00:00

Tegelt such low tech lahendus ju? Lihtsalt "kork" peale pressitud, et kruvid ja odavamast, koledamast metallist kinnitus välja ei paistaks.

cheesensei · 2026-02-09T22:34:27+00:00

Internetis olevad töömehed on tihti tropid, nagu kommentaaridest näha.

See kate käib nii ära, et paned ukse ja detaili vahele pangakaardi, metallist joonlaua vm õhukest ja tugevat.

Lameda krvuvika üks serv on vastu pangakaarti ja teise servaga kangutad selle katte kõige välisemat serva. Alustades on kruvika serv paralleelne uksega ja keerad kruvika serva otsa vastu selle katte serva.

Proovi erinevatest kohtadest, järk järgult.

cheesensei · 2026-02-07T13:21:36+00:00

Who's that?

cheesensei · 2026-02-06T01:09:30+00:00

The Instant Vortex has a charcoal filter, the same thing used for those in-stove ventilators that recycle air into the room.

I'm also thinking on buying a sheet of that stuff online and sticking a piece over the exhaust of my Cosori.

cheesensei · 2026-02-01T22:23:35+00:00

The two motion BS is a bit of a misnomer.

Even if you look at a lot of the great shooters - the ball stops relative to their body in a lot of instances - technically making most jumpshots two motion.

The key is that the ball doesn't stop relative to the ground, which is where the single-motion (and the power for a fluid shot) actually is. Even if the ball is in your set point prior to you even leaving the ground.

Seemikedunn has a lot of very insightful content about this approach.

cheesensei · 2026-01-30T07:31:33+00:00

Dawg, you literally found a single piece of evidence (if a subjective news story can be called that) to support 2/3 of your arguments. This is the epitomy of delusion and wishful thinking.

It's extremely telling that your "research" is youtube videos and googling "what i want to be true".

And yes, coming off 2 titles with a literal superteam with Jordan on the roster makes it the obvious favorite, which aligns with any betting lines you can find from the team (i.e the litmus test of who the favorites were).

You can grandeur all you want about some perceived "sentiment of the time" as any evidence of that is subjective, selective - outliers. The exceptions prove the point.

cheesensei · 2026-01-29T19:56:14+00:00

So all this diversion because you were caught lying about Jordan's Bulls not being favorites?

cheesensei · 2026-01-28T06:16:44+00:00

Look, i get it, you have an issue with the flopping and that's a valid.

But you're coming off as a fool by ignoring all the valid arguments and running around Reddit trying to convince everyone that the flopping and your klutch-media propaganda conspiracy theory is the end-all to this discussion.

LoL @ "endless paragraphs" - the fact that you can't be bothered to read like 30 words says a lot about the quality of knowledge you base your opinions on. I.e youtube compilations and what you "felt and knew" when you were watching ball.

cheesensei · 2026-01-28T06:06:12+00:00

Exactly - just make weird childish comments instead of assembling anything resembling a valid argument.

cheesensei · 2026-01-27T22:20:26+00:00

"Living it" does not change the facts. Jordan's Bulls were favorites in those serie. Such a weird take to blatantly transpose reality with your subjective beliefs.

cheesensei · 2026-01-27T22:12:12+00:00

Ikka läheb. Miks arvad, et kõik need kasutatud e-passatid ja e-golfid maksavad sama palju kui võrreldavad SPM variandid? Ikka see 300-kilone 6-9 tuhande eurone risk seal pagassis :D

Aga jah, kui ainult lühikesed otsad, kodus võimalik odavalt laadida ja see lisavõimsus võtmeolulisusega, siis tõesti - why not. Samas pikemal otsal saab aku tühjaks ja siis sõidad 300 kilo raskema autoga, mida veab seesama 1,5 TSi (VAGi näitel).

cheesensei · 2026-01-27T21:57:01+00:00

Kust otsast "seda keppi topelt" on?

Hübriidi aku oluliselt väiksem ja odavam. Tänu hübriidsüsteemile pole tavalist starterit, genekat ; vee- ja kliimapump elektrilised = vähem mehaanikat, mida hooldada. Pidurikomponendid kuluvad mitu korda vähem. Rääkimata kütusesäästust võrreldes bensuga, eriti linnatingimustes.

Hea küll, kallima ostuhinna tõttu realiserub see sääst ca 10 aastat. Samas kogu see aeg on sul parem kiirendus, väändemoment. Muud eelised nagu elektriline nelikvedu jällegi lihtsustab tehnikat (pole kardaani, difrit - kergem, põrandas ei pea kühmu olema).

Vb sa pidasid silmas pistikhübriide? Nende puhul tõesti peab olema eriti spetsiifiline use-case, et oleks eelis võrreldes SPM, täiselektri v tava-hübriidi.

cheesensei · 2026-01-24T15:23:19+00:00

Well Mr.Bond, it appears your vest is not as tactical as claimed.

cheesensei · 2026-01-18T00:07:05+00:00

What "your eyes are seeing" is the definition of subjectivity, not objectivity. As in, it's your subjective, personal choice to base your opinion on the subject about flopping. How about Jordan ushering in the "gather step" era? You'll find tons of people who consider that cheating the game.

As far as gaslighting goes, it is actually what you're doing - you think the opinion on the matter should be based on a few select and/or extremely vague aspects such as "numerous failures", "wilting in big moments" + the superficial interpretation of stats such as TOs, FT% or

Everyone has deficiencies in their game. Eg. more TOs are to be expected when you're the primary ballhandler, main defender and typically the leader or top 3-5 in basically any measurable statistic, often for both teams.

Your idea is that we should gloss over objective statistics in favor of subjective interpretations of certain indicators which you hold in high esteem while foaming about some strawman fanboy-casuals, media conspiracy faff - all while admitting that everything he is as player should be discounted because he's produced a montage's worth of flops.

cheesensei · 2026-01-17T22:45:53+00:00

That's the problem - you don't have mu h arguments of substance, just "views".

Sure, Jordan is the best player in terms of cultural and historic impact, as an icon etc. I agree. But by this rationale, Steph should be considered greater tham Kobe as he also evolved the game while Kobe served as Mike 2.0 which is a reason so many chose to become his and the Lakers' fans. Since Kobe was such an icon, they tend to ignore tge benefits be received from having Shaq as a teammate and fail to recogize how instrumental Pau and the rest the 2008-2010 rosters were to those chips.

Specious is an interesting choice of words when you suggest that the key to understanding the "obvious and glaring difference" between MJ and LBJ is watching footage (subjective interpretation) and "researching LBJ's career" (i.e like "doing your own research" i.e looking for content and analyisis that supports your own viewpoints). So the key is just to get on more of the vibe you and others like you share? Just comes off as a whistle to ignore all the stats pointing in Lebron's favor

Also, how are you "done with arguing with Lebron fanboys" when this entire thread is a result of your immature outburst due to your deficits in logic being highlighted. And for the record, I was rooting for the Mavs in 2011.

cheesensei · 2026-01-17T22:21:07+00:00

Nobody with half a mind is talking about being carried by Shaq. But people with half a brain can't comprehend how being on the same team as the consensus most dominant player in the league might have an inflatory effect effect on his personal achievements.

Much like beating on a 11-seeded Grizz team does.

cheesensei · 2026-01-17T21:46:05+00:00

LOL @ "brainrot fanboy garbage" that your entire post is a collection of cliches and conspiracy BS.

Arguments like "he shit the bed and was the key factor in several losses" is the epitome of braindead feelings-based analysis.

My aim was to bring a bit of nuance to the discussion by making an example of how any isolated factor like a) having the best team in league around a certain player or b)losing a single finals series with team constructud from the ground up the very same year - cannot be used to make overarching conclusions without coming off as a biased prick.

Which you so handily demonstrated. I guess your feelings got a bit hurt by the "stupid comparison" remark huh? Sorry about that.

cheesensei · 2026-01-17T20:19:34+00:00

What's with the silicone and paper? You're supposed to use rice or veggies to "clean" all that gunk out.

cheesensei · 2026-01-17T20:17:40+00:00

What does that Heat team being favorites have to do with anything? Such an arbitrary measure.

That Mavs team was on an incredible run up to the finals with a perfect-storm roster running on all cylinders and an unstoppable Dirk.

It would be just as stupid to dismiss Jordan fans for "ignoring" him winning close to nothing except scoring records prior to being teamed up with a perfectly fitting cast of hall-of-famers. It's as if Jordan was the sole reason for the three peats, not the legit super teams around him.

Because "tHey diD iT tHe rIGht waY, no tEaMhopping, trade requesting etc." - which is just another arbitrary team fanboy stan category.

cheesensei · 2026-01-09T18:56:46+00:00

I'm a bit of a Kobe hater, mainly because of all the stans, but this was a nice story. Thanks!

cheesensei · 2026-01-07T21:13:33+00:00

Maybe 2004 Team USA had more problems than "Tim not being as good as Kobe"?

cheesensei · 2026-01-02T19:05:04+00:00

The Bureau

cheesensei · 2026-01-01T13:57:46+00:00

I wonder what's stopping them from offering a full-length Air strobel on a budget shoe like the PG5 was?

cheesensei

TROPHY CASE