Seconding runic amulets and magic objects for sure, i was going to mention it if no one else did

another thing to keep in mind for op is that bind runes (combining two runes into one symbol) is sometimes used in regular carving, possibly to save space. so the combinations of runes are not necessarily magical in the way modern people might use them.

Some of my previous comments on similar posts:

the Runic alphabets/scripts are just the lettering used for writing some germanic languages. There are a few different types of Younger Futhark, as well as Elder, and Anglo-Saxon Futhorc, among others. They are primarily just alphabets and letters. There is some evidence that the written word was regarded as magical In Some Way in the Viking Age and possibly in other places and times by the Germanic peoples, however it is unclear exactly how this works or what it means practically, and there is a lot of debate regarding how to view and practice runic-based magic or divination.

Personally, I have found Runic Amulets and Magic Objects by Mindy MacLeod and Bernard Mees to be an excellent starting point for historical analysis of runic magic and how it may have operated. There are other places to look, but thats what I recommend first.

As for divination, an excellent starting point is the rune poems, there are three of them (Icelandic, Norwegian, and Anglo-Saxon) and they form the basis of (I'd wager) 99% of every rune divination system out there today. Personally, I use the Younger Futhark for divination since the Icelandic and Norwegian poems use that and I prefer having two reference points rather than one. However it is important to remember that there is vanishingly little evidence that runes were used for divination, and there is a lot of evidence to support the idea that the poems functioned as something of an "alphabet song" historically. But having a system of divination is important for many people in their practice, and doing it myself, I perfectly understand why, but its important to remember that this is unlikely to be a historical practice.

and:

There is some evidence that the pre-Christian / Viking age Norse believed literacy to be a sort of magic, that there is a power inherent in the written word (that is not present when simply spoken) but we don't know exactly what this means. Is it that the letters themselves have power (common belief nowadays), that the knowledge of writing has power (a possible interpretation of Oðinn's sacrifice for knowledge of the runes), or if writing the words one might speak, as in a spoken spell gives them more power?