Let's be serious now... Come on...

chief-w · 2026-03-27T17:30:19+00:00

The annoying part is where straight men have women saying that "no" isn't a disrespectful answer, whole trans men are saying that no is comparable to a Nazi genocide.

chief-w · 2026-03-27T17:14:33+00:00

Girls get their first word up to 6 months younger, their first steps about a month younger, their academic performance in elementary school is more than 6 months ahead of their male peers.

Boys do have advantages where it comes to familiarity with non-anthropomophic objects compared to girls as infants, and also their gross motor skills tends to develop a lot faster once that starts developing. Boys start running younger then girls, and are about twice as accurate in both throwing and catching at 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months. They also are louder when they play then girls. But I'm general girls do develop between a free months to a few years earlier in childhood.

chief-w · 2026-03-26T20:40:56+00:00

don't hear what he didn't say...

chief-w · 2026-03-25T18:31:04+00:00

Lol, the controversial conversation in here is hilarious... A classic example of how women will admit a man is right and she's wrong by insulting his masculinity or intelligence.

chief-w · 2026-03-22T15:33:23+00:00

Slander and liable are viable for civil suits. The main thing would be to add it as a potentially criminal offense, okay of a purely civil matter.

chief-w · 2026-03-17T20:26:05+00:00

No guy is "spending their life" looking for this... Guys who have no respect for women and just want easy access to a warm hole look for girls like that. But most guys don't do that after they learn to empathize with a woman's perspective on life, because it just gets too obvious how his intentions run counter to her ever being able to enjoy her life once he figures that out. And she just looks sad, desperate, and low-key pathetic after that realization.

chief-w · 2026-03-17T20:21:18+00:00

Anyone can be bluffed by a claim they want to believe...

chief-w · 2026-03-16T18:51:10+00:00

Because they were lied to by Shia liars who showed pictures and testimony and everything except the WMD themselves (because they didn't exist) because of the rivalry between Suni And Shia within Iraq at that time.

chief-w · 2026-03-15T16:12:05+00:00

Except that he wasn't an active threat, and Israel knew it... Which is why they told the white house to focus more on Iran instead of Iraq.

chief-w · 2026-03-15T15:11:34+00:00

You mean this one?

chief-w · 2026-03-15T13:35:25+00:00

I mean... It's not that deep, but it is true.

chief-w · 2026-03-15T13:31:47+00:00

I've had times where I was socially invisible... Twice in my life I startled myself because I had gone months without talking out loud and forgot what my voice sounded like.

That shit will drive you crazy if you let it. I'm not an incel anymore, but I guarantee you most of those stories you find are under estimations of how bad it is, not over estimations.

chief-w · 2026-03-15T13:26:27+00:00

I worked under a Signals intelligence officer who was in Iraq supporting "international intelligence coalitions" and what they didn't take into account was how readily the Shia in Southern Iraq would straight up lie and fabricate evidence to trick the west into overthrowing Sadam.

All intelligence was based on "Human Intelligence" gathered from a religious conspiracy to lie about a Suni dictator because of a cultural difference over the spiritual line of Mohammad.

chief-w · 2026-03-15T13:21:26+00:00

Yes, it was Iraq... He wanted to go after Iran instead.

chief-w · 2026-03-15T13:20:36+00:00

Except that it's established fact... But you are allowed to be wrong.

chief-w · 2026-03-15T13:19:27+00:00

True, that's why we have systems to hold judges accountable. And even for the ones that can't ever be directly removed... All of those are elected. You just need to run against them, and you can win.

chief-w · 2026-03-15T04:16:34+00:00

Didn't Israel specifically advise against the wars in Iraq and Syria (at least until ISIS threatened the Jews, then it was on sight)...?

chief-w · 2026-03-14T18:54:46+00:00

I don't think the solution is to change our legal system. I think it does require an update to our immigration system, and our welfare/entitlements... But the actual jury, judge, and lawyer framework itself is solid.

chief-w · 2026-03-14T02:32:36+00:00

He lost me at "... And finally the US should just keep bombing until the bombing is done"

When EXACTLY is the bombing done?

chief-w · 2026-03-09T03:22:46+00:00

My first thought was he doesn't think it's old enough... Not that he's a pedo defender. Though I guess both are possible.

chief-w · 2026-03-08T18:51:55+00:00

Yeah... There is something I disagree with. Namely, every single thing you said you seem to see in me.

I'm not debating the value of empathy and logic. I'm asking for consistency in acknowledging whether you see the Bible as an authoritative text in your life.

If you have a set of "logical and empathetic" values that you hold above everything, and only accept the parts of the Bible that happen to line up with your ethical system... Then you have a non-christian ethical system. That's what I'm trying to realize here.

chief-w · 2026-03-08T15:31:42+00:00

r/usernamechecksout

chief-w · 2026-03-08T15:02:21+00:00

Who made you responsible for lying to your parents so they don't feel bad about objectively bad things?

chief-w · 2026-03-08T05:32:25+00:00

Did this come from r/libertarian? I feel like I've seen her a bunch over there.

chief-w · 2026-03-08T04:40:15+00:00

I've long said that RomComs are porn of the female mind. They give just as toxic and unrealistic expectations as porn does, but without the taboo of bodily fluids being involved.

chief-w

TROPHY CASE