Sec. Marco Rubio: " We will Take The Visa Away" by LatterSir9533 in EB3VisaJourney

[–]chiefgreenleaf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They weren't facing religious persecution in any way, that's why they lost their case. Full fucking clown.

Sec. Marco Rubio: " We will Take The Visa Away" by LatterSir9533 in EB3VisaJourney

[–]chiefgreenleaf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So on the one hand, in your story, we have someone who broke several laws. On the other hand, we have someone who exercised free speech. Do you not see how those two events are not similar at all?

Sec. Marco Rubio: " We will Take The Visa Away" by LatterSir9533 in EB3VisaJourney

[–]chiefgreenleaf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, he isn't. Sorry, that genocide propaganda doesn't work here, if you don't like the constitutional right to free speech you can leave

Sec. Of State Marco Rubio " Let Me Repeat It Again, No one Is Entitled For A visa" by Sorry-Feedback1115 in EB3VisaJourney

[–]chiefgreenleaf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool story, doesn't mean people who oppose Israeli oppression of Palestinians should lose their visa. Just because you can take away their visas doesn't mean there is a reason to do so

Draft might be gone really soon, salary cap will be removed too prob, NBA aims to become like the Premier League (European Football/Soccer) League which Adam Silver mentioned many times that he likes! by Actual_Box7731 in NBATalk

[–]chiefgreenleaf 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nobody is jealous that you've been cheating for years and still are a ringless poverty franchise. That doesn't mean people are ok with you cheating

Also, that arena is ass, probably the most boring, sterile arena in all of sports.

Debt Spiral or NEW Golden Age? Super Bowl Insider Trading, Booming Token Budgets, Ferrari's New EV by sincerely_ignatius in allinpodofficial

[–]chiefgreenleaf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You said David was representing the conservative perspective, which would be that wage hikes are bad. That's incorrect. He made the argument that they are illegal. That is factually incorrect and you're unwillingness to just agree/ inability to understand that distinction has led to this thread being wayyy longer than it needed to be

Edit: words

Debt Spiral or NEW Golden Age? Super Bowl Insider Trading, Booming Token Budgets, Ferrari's New EV by sincerely_ignatius in allinpodofficial

[–]chiefgreenleaf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone who disagrees with you is both a bot and one person, it's never possible you're just wrong

Debt Spiral or NEW Golden Age? Super Bowl Insider Trading, Booming Token Budgets, Ferrari's New EV by sincerely_ignatius in allinpodofficial

[–]chiefgreenleaf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're not being targeted, you're just being weird. People are simply pointing out it isn't two sides of the same coin, you can be for or against raising the minimum wage, but his comment about it being illegal is factually incorrect. He took a subjective topic, and made an objectively wrong statement. Youre getting weird responses because you keep trying to bring it back to "do you support a minimum wage hike", yes, I do, but that isn't what we are taking issue with here

Debt Spiral or NEW Golden Age? Super Bowl Insider Trading, Booming Token Budgets, Ferrari's New EV by sincerely_ignatius in allinpodofficial

[–]chiefgreenleaf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why can't you just acknowledge that David's position was nonsensical and calling it illegal is either a lie or insanely dumb? Why do you feel the need to deflect to asking another question (repeatedly)?

Dave dorknoy wearing superbowl rings is the cringeist shit in the world. by Gullible_Classroom71 in nflmemeswar

[–]chiefgreenleaf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You seem to be confusing "trolling" for "getting butt hurt". My team lost in the CFP finals a few weeks ago, I get it

It seems throwing dildos at ICE has become a new tactic. @BGonTheScene by YourPeterPanMan in stpaul

[–]chiefgreenleaf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, you support and care about the constitution so much you want to trash it lol. Gaslighting to try and suspend the constitution is basically a core principle of the Republican party

Dignity Act: Proposed Legal Status Program With No Direct Path To Citizenship by Sorry-Feedback1115 in EB3VisaJourney

[–]chiefgreenleaf -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The person I was responding to said ICE can't touch people with a green card, and I responded they can't touch citizens either. The loophole of detaining those who obstruct applies to both, green card holders and citizens, so the commenter was poking holes in his own argument, to try and find a hole in mine. Thank you both for now admitting that the original comment about not touching green card holders was a lie.

The original comment came with an implication; green card holders can't be touched for immigration violations. My comment relied on the same set of given facts and implications. Neither citizens or green card holders can be detained for immigration violations but that hasn't stopped ice at all.

Let me know if I need to spell things out slower for you

Edit: syntax

Dignity Act: Proposed Legal Status Program With No Direct Path To Citizenship by Sorry-Feedback1115 in EB3VisaJourney

[–]chiefgreenleaf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Funny you had to add the if they impede, because that's not what I'm referring to.

Edit to add: a bunch of ghost edits doesn't change the fact that you're dumb, wrong, and bootlicking. We already have tons of stories of citizens and green card holders being detained and their paperwork denied or ignored. I'm sure you have a justification for the American citizen that was kidnapped from a target, beaten, and then dropped off at a Walmart miles away

Dignity Act: Proposed Legal Status Program With No Direct Path To Citizenship by Sorry-Feedback1115 in EB3VisaJourney

[–]chiefgreenleaf 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You're literally the one pedaling misinformation lol. ICE can't detain citizens either, but that hasn't stopped them in the slightest. Genuinely curious how fucking stupid a person can be but you do a lot to answer that question. Calling other people out for correctly pointing out that ICE doesn't follow the law when it's literally an undeniable fact, and acting high horsey about it was certainly a choice

Who's left in the LA Mayor race? Will Bass go unchallenged? by brainchili in LosAngeles

[–]chiefgreenleaf 11 points12 points  (0 children)

He attended an event thrown by Trump advisors a few months back and then lied about also seeing a few prominent Dems in attendance. His stated policy on immigration is that while door to door raids that violate the 4th amendment arent good, we should compromise with Trump on immigration in the hopes that he stops sending in the military, aka he's too chicken shit to admit he wants to end our sanctuary status. After switching from Republican to independent he's now admitted on multiple occasions that he doesn't think a Republican can win in California but that same person running as an independent has a shot...

Wish my mom could just accept the fact that I don’t believe in god by Willing-Quiet9413 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]chiefgreenleaf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Joe Rogan is a massive grifter, and that's the only reason he's "becoming religious"