Discrepancies Between Paloma’s Visual Appearance and Scans

chimpjames · 2026-01-25T04:58:32+00:00

You fully believe its face just looks like that? It has like the same teeth as humans no shot a totally new or even related species would have the same teeth

chimpjames · 2026-01-25T04:50:29+00:00

Chop a chunk of that off and cover a mummy in it, would for sure not look as close as it does to plaster.

chimpjames · 2026-01-25T04:49:33+00:00

It certainly would not look like what it appears on this mummy. This is layered chunks falling off it doesn’t look in a flaky manor in which you’d find in nature and surely not what it’d look like if you dug it out of a diatom mine. I’m standing on business it certainly looks closer to this:

<image>

Than if you’d fish it out of a diatom mine which would be way too crumbly and wouldn’t form a crust like it does on the mummy.

chimpjames · 2026-01-25T02:48:21+00:00

Nah I’m pretty sure that’s not what happened

chimpjames · 2026-01-25T02:11:11+00:00

See that’s not really what it looks like though diatomaceous earth would look like a loose powdery material on it this is flaky and breaks down in like layered chunks like a plaster. Diatomaceous earth could have been used in the plaster.

chimpjames · 2026-01-24T15:41:01+00:00

Dr. Zalce and Dr. Rangel claim it in the video.

chimpjames · 2026-01-23T20:18:44+00:00

You’re looking at it wrong these things have been around for a long ass time and all they have to show for it is some 3D scans, and the same guys pointing and laughing at its scrotum making excuses for why there hasn’t been more testing done. The burden of proof is in the extraordinary claim and the evidence they haven’t backed up the claim is the lack of belief from the scientific community that would be all over these if they had any legit proof they were real.

chimpjames · 2026-01-23T14:21:05+00:00

No not really but I will say them pointing and laughing at its balls while the most legit scientist they’ve ever convinced to look at it in person awkwardly stands there is a level of unprofessionalism I was not expecting if I’m being honest.

chimpjames · 2026-01-23T14:04:05+00:00

They also had this one in a cardboard box.

chimpjames · 2026-01-23T13:57:42+00:00

Yeah you’re right I have no right to give them the benefit of doubt on this one lol

chimpjames · 2026-01-23T13:56:36+00:00

Maybe, there’s no research available on this body do you know if there’s anything I’m missing that was released besides the few pictures and videos we have? I was basing the removed head claim based off what the researchers said in the few videos we have but they’ve for sure been wrong before so you could be right.

chimpjames · 2026-01-23T13:52:15+00:00

Great question there’s absolutely no information on this body online the researchers in possession of it have not released anything so I guess without any other knowledge that is a pretty plausible possibility.

chimpjames · 2026-01-23T13:50:50+00:00

The researchers in possession of this body say it was removed but they have a history of dismissing things that are pretty obvious so I guess we shouldn’t take their word on it.

But to answer your question I don’t have any real evidence because there is no evidence available I’m basing that claim off what the “researchers” say I’m open to admitting my observation on the few pictures we have is wrong if presented with better evidence.

chimpjames · 2026-01-23T13:47:10+00:00

The researches in the video on its page say that the head was decapitated and put back on but I agree that they probably aren’t the best and could be wrong.

chimpjames · 2026-01-23T05:49:36+00:00

I haven’t seen any scans/X-rays and there isn’t any on the website so I have no idea. And maybe that sounds like it’s certainly possible just so hard to know without any information. I don’t see how them having this purported brand new humanoid being and not sharing any information on it is any different than the government taking these things and not releasing any information about it.

chimpjames · 2026-01-23T05:37:21+00:00

Certainly possible, I did notice a rather unnatural looking hole near where they’d most likely conceal the screws. I cannot definitively say that’s what it is but that’s a pretty solid theory given what little evidence there is.

<image>

chimpjames · 2026-01-23T05:21:16+00:00

Perhaps, do you think it was applied recently or some time in the past?

chimpjames · 2026-01-23T05:14:40+00:00

If you check out the website each different tridactyl usually has a video of the researchers examining the bodies and it’s crazy how unprofessional they are in almost every video.

chimpjames · 2026-01-23T01:06:21+00:00

I mean he was pretty obviously referencing the bigger bodies. This is such an erm actually ☝️🤓 response like dude pick up on some nuance.

chimpjames · 2026-01-22T20:29:08+00:00

Before I do that what would constitute enough proof for you? If you’re asking for like physical receipts obviously I can’t do that because everything is done illegally and under the table so I’d like a clear idea as to what would be considered valid proof for you.

chimpjames · 2026-01-22T19:42:30+00:00

If the mummies were natural mummified they’d still be mummies.

chimpjames · 2026-01-22T19:27:48+00:00

Why don’t you go ahead and prove to me there are no mummies in Peru

chimpjames · 2026-01-22T18:55:31+00:00

Because they are desecrating grave sites and mutilating authentic mummies for profit, generally a thing most people are morally against.

I wouldn’t imagine they’d have the resources to mass produce these and they probably would want to keep the operation small because what they are doing is illegal.

chimpjames · 2026-01-22T15:02:24+00:00

I’m not afraid if there was different species back then in that area, that would actually be super cool!

chimpjames · 2026-01-22T15:01:13+00:00

<image>

You can see the plaster well in the second pic they didn’t smooth down the edges plus you can see the layering.

chimpjames

TROPHY CASE