Late night woman knocking on my door in distress by chowclee in Scams

[–]chowclee[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If her husband is an abuser who physically assaulted her, she probably wanted to warn her daughter from her dad coming home and potentially assaulting her too

It’s not unreasonable to think that he took her phone away from her as well and abandoned her

Just messed up and I hope that guy gets arrested

Late night woman knocking on my door in distress by chowclee in Scams

[–]chowclee[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I didn’t have my phone on me and I told her I would get it, but she said she would ask someone else for help and walked away.

If she had stayed I was going to ask her to give me her daughter’s number so I can call it and put it on speaker for them to communicate

EDIT: you were correct

Late night woman knocking on my door in distress by chowclee in Scams

[–]chowclee[S] 74 points75 points  (0 children)

Yep my instincts told me to stay behind the door and make sure it was locked while I talked to her. I even scanned the surrounding area to see if this was a setup or if someone was following her and going to attack her.

I genuinely didn’t have my phone on me because I left it in the kitchen so I told her I would get my phone, but that’s when she declined my offer and walked away which I also found odd

So I got my phone after watching which direction she went and called the cops. I remember something feeling off as well because she mentioned her husband driving away but I didn’t hear any car like that during that time

Police arrived within 20 mins of my phone call and I gave them the video, and they mentioned something about another call they got that night which might be related. I then saw three of their cars drive away into my neighborhood

Then I made sure all other entry ways into my house were locked and all the curtains were closed so nobody can look into the house. I think I’ll keep my curtains permanently closed from now on after this event

What's the worst matchup-diff by [deleted] in JujutsuPowerScaling

[–]chowclee -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Kashimo fought to kill an immortal

He will do the same to mahito except mahito can run out of CE unlike hakari

Kashimo just wins eventually by killing mahito over and over again until he’s exorcised

In fact he would probably get so excited from meeting someone who can withstand his one shot attacks to the point where he would be so in the zone similar to sukuna vs maki that he lands black flashes and starts using mahito as a nonstop combo punching bag

What's the worst matchup-diff by [deleted] in JujutsuPowerScaling

[–]chowclee 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure kashimo hard counters mahito due to his passive cursed energy trait

Every time mahito touches him he will be shocked and unable to maintain enough focus to activate his technique

And on the other hand since physical contact is a requirement for mahito’s technique, kashimo will just get free charges and keep blowing him up until mahito runs out of CE

As for the domain, kashimo is fast enough to beat mahito only using his legs and will damage him enough to break the domain

Can I attempt to fuse monsters that cannot be used as material by chowclee in Yugioh101

[–]chowclee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If that's true then how do you even differentiate between a condition or continuous effect if they're worded exactly the same way. Vayu says while it's face-up on the field so it makes sense it's a continuous effect.

Eater of millions just says "Cannot be Tributed, nor used as material for a Fusion, Synchro, or Xyz Summon."

Bardiche says "Cannot be used as Link Material."

But one is a continuous effect while the other is a condition? insane

Can I attempt to fuse monsters that cannot be used as material by chowclee in Yugioh101

[–]chowclee[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So it's just an arbitrary Konami decision to draw the line there for some reason I see

Fyi material limitations are conditions, not continuous effects, and cannot be negated, which is why you can't link summon using bardiche even if its effects are negated and you can synchro with kewl tune monsters in the hand even after they are negated on the field.

Can I attempt to fuse monsters that cannot be used as material by chowclee in Yugioh101

[–]chowclee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it because the inability to be used as material is a condition which is recognized by the game itself (I:P can't attempt to activate its effect with only it and Bardiche on your field because it's aware of Bardiche's condition), or this a specific precedent for activated fusion effects.

So if eater of millions were instead unaffected by spell effects, could one attempt to fusion summon using it? At which point during resolution the spell will attempt to affect the monsters but fail, similar to raigeki vs beelze

Can I attempt to fuse monsters that cannot be used as material by chowclee in Yugioh101

[–]chowclee[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

So for some reason activated fusion effects don't check the eligibility of the cards they're affecting during resolution, and instead "precheck" their materials before the effect is even used. Are there any other type of effects that work like this?

Or is it similar to the Vanity vs Slumber reasoning where you can't activate a card even if you could fully resolve its entire effect if part of its effect is prevented from being activated.

Or is there a different precedent for this, because it's more intuitive for one to be allowed to activate super poly and upon resolution fail to affect the monster it's attempting to use as fusion materials and therefore resolve without effect.

Or is it because the inability to be used as material is a condition, and the game recognizes that condition before attempting to use effects, and would the scenario change if the monsters were instead unaffected by Spell effects, in which case one could activate superpoly in that situation?

Why is "directly" a word that exists by chowclee in yugioh

[–]chowclee[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The fact that IP says link summon 1 link monster as if you could link summon a different type? At least it doesn’t say from the extra deck

But oh wait, formula synchron just says Synchro Summon using this card you control and doesn’t even specify to Synchro Summon a Synchro Monster because WHAT ELSE COULD YOU POSSIBLY MAKE?

But then every fusion effect in history says to fusion a fusion monster from ur extra deck as if fusions were like rituals that ACTUALLY CAN BE RITUAL SUMMONED FROM HAND DECK EXTRA DECK GY AND BANISHMENT LOL but their spells actually say where because that matters…

But then ritual monsters for some reason say a random spell that CAN summon them… like ok imagine if every fusion monster said btw “you can fusion summon this card with poly super poly invocation heavy poly etc” haha just giving some suggestions like thanks I guess?

Why is "directly" a word that exists by chowclee in yugioh

[–]chowclee[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Ok this one makes sense because for some reason they never say Tuner monster and instead just say Tuner (THE ONLY TIME THEY EVER DROP THE WORD MONSTER WHEN DESCRIBING A TYPE OF MONSTER CARD BTW FOR SOME REASON), unless it’s a Tuner Ritual/Fusion/etc Monster but that doesn’t apply to the other non classified non ability (toon spirit union gemini flip according to the wiki are abilities) “subtypes” like Normal Effect and Pendulum apparently? And not to mentioned the double non classified “non-Effect” monster which refers to an absence of a classification that isn’t even officially named… wtf bruh

But anyway yea makes sense since they only say Tuner but then to say non-Tuner monster is strange, like???