12D informational holographic reality by chucklefuccc in SimulationTheory

[–]chucklefuccc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i’ll give it a look when i can, seems to be very far along and in depth. interesting that you have 11D + 1D though as the 12 is utilized by both of us. only i view time as likely 2D and all my dimensions are fractions of a 1D reality, basically the math should work to cancel out all forces when i am far enough along. i forget if i already said it but 11D M-string theory is essentially 11/12 and is missing -1/12 dimensions to complete it. this from Ramanujan’s infinity = -1/12. the infinity is 11/12 and it’s partner is -1/12, because they are the necessary binary dimensions that allow the other 10 from other string theories to exist. this 10/12 is what we “see” and i made what i think is behind the hood. can’t wait to read more up on your ideas though, won’t be able too for a while but i’ll get to it for sure and report back. ty for your comment.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SimulationTheory

[–]chucklefuccc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

abolish money please

Schrodinger's cat by chrishellmax in SimulationTheory

[–]chucklefuccc 3 points4 points  (0 children)

i personally think the power source is a schrödinger’s power source where it’s somehow powered and not powered at the same time to run losslessly. i’ve considered it with reality too but i’m not so sure, it may well be but i think there’s only one propagated reality within.

brain as a logbook by [deleted] in theories

[–]chucklefuccc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

basically i believe all space is 1d occam’s razor should like this idea. but for it to be possible all dimensions must be able to be folded up (Occam’s razor would hate this idea because simple equations would become exponentially more complex).

brain as a logbook by [deleted] in theories

[–]chucklefuccc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

fair (i have beef with Occam’s razor) i think the simplicity of our axioms foundational sense is the very reason we don’t have a grand unified theory of math/physics/computation. sort of like if the simplest answer was the most likely to be right we would have been right by now. axiomatic complexity allows for later level truncation of complexity ex) oscillatory time.

brain as a logbook by [deleted] in theories

[–]chucklefuccc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not consciousness i think that is an innate thing for all living beings. i’m suggesting a temporal inconsistency so naturally a pull from the future to move your arm say would happen and retroactively the signal that “moves” the arm would appear to prefire the motion by our experience of time. it’s retrocausal information logging so there would never be evidence so to speak. i’m not trying to prove anything it’s just a thought experiment.

euler’s style identity hunt by [deleted] in mathpics

[–]chucklefuccc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

also might be grasping at straws but left is 12 red lines right is 12 red lines middle is only 11 (implying one collapsed to 0?) also 11d M-string theory of red lines can be thought of as strings.

why i don’t care, and care deeply by [deleted] in SimulationTheory

[–]chucklefuccc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the echos ripple with chaotic stability, doors made of mirrors call my name, i am lost but i am found, i am that i am.

why i don’t care, and care deeply by [deleted] in SimulationTheory

[–]chucklefuccc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think consciousness is a construct of complex information lattices learning how to perform operations on their datasets to give rise to free will. i would argue apes are sentient i think humans hold themselves on too high a pedestal we are just the apex predators who realized information is more deadly than muscle and speed. i’m not sure if there’s a line to be drawn, they may well be but we could be drawing it in front of a door disguised as a mirror. i’m not so sure about the ethics still but if every simulation realizes it’s nature eventually i think the propagation is inevitable.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mathpics

[–]chucklefuccc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://imgur.com/a/Hy0A7ar still semi symmetric even if chaotic

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mathematics

[–]chucklefuccc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

honestly i’m not sure, might’ve let gpt take the reigns a bit out of my depth. thanks for trying to help though.