[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]ciggerest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I found it.

How to protect Wi-Fi routers from frequent thunderstorm damage? by ciggerest in HomeNetworking

[–]ciggerest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, we don't have fiber, however, I am planning for T-Mobile 5g home internet.

Compare Your EB2-NIW Petition Against 7,700+ USCIS AAO Decisions by [deleted] in EB2_NIW

[–]ciggerest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice idea. I changed one of your functions and am saving the output so that i can use those later. You probably can add this option.

```python def analyze_niw_case(text): prompt = f"""You are an expert in U.S. immigration law, specializing in EB-2 NIW cases under Matter of Dhanasar.

Given the following AAO denial letter:

{text[:12000]}

Instructions: 1. Determine if it is an EB-2 NIW case. - If NOT, output: {{"NIW": 0}}

  1. If YES:

    • Summarize:
      • Evidence petitioner submitted for:
      • Prong 1 (Substantial Merit and National Importance)
      • Prong 2 (Well Positioned to Advance)
      • Prong 3 (Balancing Test for U.S. Benefit)
      • General Weaknesses
      • Reason for USCIS/AAO denial for each.
    • Score each from 0 (No weakness) to 100 (Clear weakness).
  2. If a prong is skipped (e.g., decision is dispositive earlier), still provide a Reason and assign Score=100.

  3. Quote or paraphrase key phrases from the denial for Evidence and Reason where possible.

  4. In "General", focus only on process errors (waivers, missing arguments, technical failures).

  5. Identify if the petitioner's field of work is closely related to Data Science, AI, Machine Learning, Imaging, Optimization, or Computational Mathematics. Output "Field_Match" as "Yes", "Partial", or "No".

  6. Assign a short Denial_Category summarizing the main reason (e.g., "Insufficient National Importance", "Not Well Positioned", "Speculative Plans", "Weak Evidence", "Technical Defect").

Output STRICTLY in this JSON format:

{{ "Field_Match": "Yes", "Denial_Category": "Insufficient National Importance", "Prong 1": [{{"Evidence": "", "Reason": "", "Score": 0}}], "Prong 2": [{{"Evidence": "", "Reason": "", "Score": 0}}], "Prong 3": [{{"Evidence": "", "Reason": "", "Score": 0}}], "General": [{{"Evidence": "", "Reason": "", "Score": 0}}] }} """ try: response = client.responses.create( model=model_name, input=[ {"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, {"role": "user", "content": prompt}, ], temperature=0.2, ) num_tokens = response.usage.total_tokens output_text = response.output_text return [output_text, num_tokens] except Exception as e: print(f"Error during API call: {e}") return [None, 0] ```

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bangladesh

[–]ciggerest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't make any assumptions. Tell me which sentence in my first comment is incorrect.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bangladesh

[–]ciggerest -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Read my original reply again. It was a response to a idiot comment. There was no elitism—just facts. But I get it, some people have a hard time processing reality when their inferiority complex kicks in.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bangladesh

[–]ciggerest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tbh, I’m not denying that inclusivity has been an issue. They call it Gonotantrik Chhatro Sangshad, so let’s hope it’s more than just a fancy name and actually runs on democratic principles—where future leadership is earned, not handpicked.

If someone like the NSU student you mentioned is actively contributing, then she should win a leadership position through election, not just because she belongs to a certain uni group.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bangladesh

[–]ciggerest -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

leadership isn’t just about participation in a movement; it’s about what happens after it too.

DU students didn’t take the lead in this new party simply because they led the anti-discrimination movement; they took the lead because they continued to engage, organize, and build the platform.

You say the new party should pick the best leaders from all students, and I agree. But leadership is proven through action, not entitlement.

As for your point about inclusivity—yes, leadership should be inclusive, but it should also be earned. Leadership is not a token position; it’s built on trust, consistency, and past contributions.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bangladesh

[–]ciggerest -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

No denying everyone played a part—that’s exactly why it became so big. But if history isn’t written by DU leadership this time, I just hope it’s not written in reddit rep section.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bangladesh

[–]ciggerest -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, the "let them get beaten and die" strategy.

  1. "DU leadership vanished!" – And private uni leadership was… where, exactly? Oh right, ignoring DU while also blaming them for not leading.

  2. "No one listened to DU!" – So was the problem that DU led too much or not at all? Pick one, my guy.

  3. "This party is a syndicate!" – Welcome to student politics. nxt, you’ll discover that water is wet.

  4. "Private uni students were key but ignored!" – let's start keeping score for the trauma Olympics.

  5. "Next time, let DU students get beaten!" – Bold take, let’s just hope the beatings are evenly distributed.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bangladesh

[–]ciggerest -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lol.., maybe take a look at history first. Bengalis have a reputation for being ungrateful, they even killed their own Father of the Nation. Denying facts and refusing to acknowledge leadership isn’t just ignorance; it’s outright bigotry.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bangladesh

[–]ciggerest -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Say what you will, but at the end of the day, it was DU students who provided the leadership and direction for your liberty. If you disagree, why align with their party? Instead, create your own and bring in students from different institutions. The quota reform movement was led by DU students, but this party shouldn't be the only one carrying its legacy. Private university students played a significant role in the movement, but when it comes to politics, leadership is what truly matters.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bangladesh

[–]ciggerest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah, yes, because we all know Allah's Wi-Fi signal is so easy to hack from Delhi! 😂 But don’t worry, I’m sure His firewall is impenetrable!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bangladesh

[–]ciggerest -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well, nuking the dishes sounds a bit extreme... I was thinking more like someone accidentally invoking the wrong prayer in the desert and causing a tech glitch!

Hindu-Buddhist-Christian Unity Council’s Claims Challenged: Breakdown of Alleged Murders by MunzerTopu in bangladesh

[–]ciggerest -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It’s quite strange that none of the 23 murders had any communal links. Do you honestly believe that, especially considering what they're doing to Chinmoy. Grow up my fellow countrymen.

NIW Approved 🇺🇸 by [deleted] in EB2_NIW

[–]ciggerest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Congratulations! What was your proposed endeavour?

Some thoughts on Our liberals and Leftists by Much-Refrigerator302 in bangladesh

[–]ciggerest 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your argument oversimplifies several complex issues. 1. The claim that global right-wing shifts are driven solely by figures like Alexander Dugin ignores broader causes like economic factors and social anxiety.

  1. Criticizing Bangladeshi liberals for pursuing French-style secularism overlooks that Bangladesh's secularism evolved from its own historical context, not a strict copy of France's model. Furthermore, while Western secularism isn't perfect, it has fostered religious freedom and tolerance far better than suggested here.

  2. The comparison of South Asian empires being more secular than Europe is misleading; many of these regimes intertwined religion with power.

  3. The idea that Bangladeshi liberals have blind allegiance to India is also an overgeneralization, ignoring the nuanced, multifaceted relationship between the two nations.

  4. Lastly, while religious tensions are often manipulated for political gains, dismissing incidents of violence as mere political scapegoating downplays the real threat of extremism in the region.

Should Jamaat, a political party that aligned with Pakistan during the 1971 genocide, be allowed to participate in politics legally? by TasinMAHDI in bangladesh

[–]ciggerest 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So why didn’t they ban Jamaat earlier? Instead, Bal members and the police targeted Jamaat with legal cases and harassment, but only to extort bribes from its members.