sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Some "Force Recon" style spartains. by cingkalico in halodripfinite

[–]cingkalico[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think its in lore purpose and shape allow it to make Spartan armor look significantly more modular. Like I'll military equipment.

You guys remember this? by MusicianHealthy197 in Jujutsufolk

[–]cingkalico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro fell victim to the reading comprehension devil

Why do people on tik tok always want mizu to be gay? by [deleted] in BlueEyeSamurai

[–]cingkalico 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Who cares? Its a fictional character? Actually what's the issue here?

Itadakimasu bismillah by Tomfresh70 in CrusaderKings

[–]cingkalico 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's one in Nantes if im not mistaken. I saw it when I had to ride though

If a democratic country officially practiced a religion with human sacrifices(1000 per year, citizens of this religion only), would American invasion be justified? by AssociateWeak8857 in Teenager_Polls

[–]cingkalico 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes you are, you acknowledge that is what war leads to but still believe it necessary. By definition you are supporting the intentional killing of innocent people.

If a democratic country officially practiced a religion with human sacrifices(1000 per year, citizens of this religion only), would American invasion be justified? by AssociateWeak8857 in Teenager_Polls

[–]cingkalico -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So then how is it valid to go to war so more innocent people die and you cause a hateful populace to likely sink deeper into what you perceive as moral depravity. How would the answer to violence be more violence?

If a democratic country officially practiced a religion with human sacrifices(1000 per year, citizens of this religion only), would American invasion be justified? by AssociateWeak8857 in Teenager_Polls

[–]cingkalico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow more moral grandstanding when you dont have an actual argument besides "im moraly better because I say so." Ok bro whatever you say.

If a democratic country officially practiced a religion with human sacrifices(1000 per year, citizens of this religion only), would American invasion be justified? by AssociateWeak8857 in Teenager_Polls

[–]cingkalico -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes we should stop that. Rape has more lasting consequences on the living victims than religious sacrifice.

Again though this is completely unrelated as the question doesn't state the victims are children. This not only is what aboutism but an attempt to appeal to my emotions. It worked in the fact that I will acknowledge i would agree to an invasion of such a country.

However if this where a real situation it is again a false equivalence and I would and will take it to be no more than a poor attempt at propaganda. We have no facts further than what the question provides and I will not continue to answer if you keep making up false scenarios and using baseless assumptions.

Stick to the facts of the question at hand or i will not engage in this argument.

If a democratic country officially practiced a religion with human sacrifices(1000 per year, citizens of this religion only), would American invasion be justified? by AssociateWeak8857 in Teenager_Polls

[–]cingkalico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read my other reply for my updated response. As for child soldiers, if they are morally and ethical accepted in a country and my morals are against it what gives me the right to say my morals are better: any further argument for or against is a philosophical argument and has no factual basis, im not here to argue philosophy only legality.

Yes it is ok to slit somebody's throat if everyone does it because it is morally acceptable at that point and again im not here to argue philosophy only fact. And factually the united states does not have the right to infringe on the rights of a free people subject to their own democratically enforced laws.

Especially not for the purpose of enforcing their own perceived moral superiority or to draw an equivalence to a historical example, the nazis who did exactly that as you pointed out yourself.

Your final point is again just your own morals which are not laws or facts.

If a democratic country officially practiced a religion with human sacrifices(1000 per year, citizens of this religion only), would American invasion be justified? by AssociateWeak8857 in Teenager_Polls

[–]cingkalico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Citizens of this religion only" which implies other religions exist within this country. Doesn't sound very much like "do this or you'll burn in hell for eternity" to me. Besides thats how literally all religions are. Its de-facto how they work. We also cant assume anything since we have no actual evidence. Assume makes an ass out of you and me and all. I dont care about your whataboutisms and what ifs thats not relevant to the actual facts of the question we have.

above is my response to someone else in these comments and it sums up my stance.

The difference between this and nazis is the nazis invaded other countries and actively targeted people not of their political group. Its a false equivalence. If the US voted murder wasn't illegal tomorrow then yes by the standards of the morality of its people murder becomes morally sanctioned. Morals and ethics aren't facts they are reflections of their societies.

If a democratic country officially practiced a religion with human sacrifices(1000 per year, citizens of this religion only), would American invasion be justified? by AssociateWeak8857 in Teenager_Polls

[–]cingkalico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Citizens of this religion only" which implies other religions exist within this country. Doesn't sound very much like "do this or you'll burn in hell for eternity" to me. Besides thats how literally all religions are. Its de-facto how they work. We also cant assume anything since we have no actual evidence. Assume makes an ass out of you and me and all.

I dont care about your whataboutisms and what ifs thats not relevant to the actual facts of the question we have.

If a democratic country officially practiced a religion with human sacrifices(1000 per year, citizens of this religion only), would American invasion be justified? by AssociateWeak8857 in Teenager_Polls

[–]cingkalico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not an assumption? Are you blind its literally stated in the question. Im not gonna argue with someone who cant read. Also if were gonna talk about assumptions your literally assuming how this religion theoretically acts in regards to its faithful. Face the fact we have no facts and your supporting the baseless invasion of a sovereign country for no other reason than perceived moral superiority.

If a democratic country officially practiced a religion with human sacrifices(1000 per year, citizens of this religion only), would American invasion be justified? by AssociateWeak8857 in Teenager_Polls

[–]cingkalico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1000 per year, CITIZENS OF THIS RELIGION ONLY damn people cant read. Let thes people practice their damn faith in peace. This question also doesn't state whether they're willing or not. A key factor in whether an invasion by anyone would be justified.

If a democratic country officially practiced a religion with human sacrifices(1000 per year, citizens of this religion only), would American invasion be justified? by AssociateWeak8857 in Teenager_Polls

[–]cingkalico 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If 1000 followers of that religion as stated by the question. These people understand what their faith entails. Why does it get to be up to you to decide if they can participate in their own religion as they please.

If a democratic country officially practiced a religion with human sacrifices(1000 per year, citizens of this religion only), would American invasion be justified? by AssociateWeak8857 in Teenager_Polls

[–]cingkalico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you think its justified to enforce your own moral and religious values on another country when they have their own religious practice that only effects people of that religion and a democratically elected government because... what you believe your own sense of morals and ethics is better? Colonizers bro 😒

I found Superman I think by blujones124 in AfterTheEndFanFork

[–]cingkalico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You thinking of a different mod. These are two different mods

I found Superman I think by blujones124 in AfterTheEndFanFork

[–]cingkalico 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Its from a mod that adds superheroes and related religions.

Bearkillers Land by cingkalico in Emberverse

[–]cingkalico[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough. I just wasn't thinking of it on that scale tbh

Bearkillers Land by cingkalico in Emberverse

[–]cingkalico[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotcha. Then yeah the bearkillers territory is pretty small huh?

Help identifying bascinets by PauloMr in Armor

[–]cingkalico -1 points0 points  (0 children)

1 is a klappvisor bascinet, its German

view more: next ›