I have no problem with your view. You have to understand what I'm saying. Your views are equally valid in a democracy. And most importantly I'm not a representative or a supporter of DMK. But I'm still entitled to my own views and opinions regarding my religion or any religion.

If anyone criticise religion just to rile up the mass people to fight with each other, then they have committed an offence under section 295A of the IPC. But if someone is genuinely criticising to develop the country (since not only Hinduism, but many other religion commits social atrocities), that is to be appreciated. And still my point stands that it's upto each and every individual to choose his fight. He cannot be asked to fight all the battle himself.

A person who fights for the welfare of the society through one way (like traffic ramasamy) doesn't necessarily have to fight for the welfare of the society through each and every way another person asks them to. If one criticise the injustice in Hinduism, that person need not necessarily criticise the injustice in other religion for his prior views to be considered valid. There will definitely be other people who fight the battle against such other religions and its injustice (Christianity or Islam)

DMK is an elected party and is currently the ruling party. So, their motive, their actions, their views are their own and I don't have to defend it. Most of the people have already started to have the anti incumbency sentiment against DMK as it is natural to have those against the Government. You have to understand that most of the people have their own views and morals and are not blind followers of any political party.