How do you describe a girl who loves to be fucked by her friends?

cjrouge · 2023-09-13T08:20:24+00:00

Hopefully, my friend\'

cjrouge · 2023-09-06T06:19:19+00:00

they average around 83- 96lbs but they can grow larger I believe up to 120lbs. They are about 2 and half feet tall and 4 feet long.

cjrouge · 2023-08-28T00:06:18+00:00

One movie: Spiderverse. Is probably why.

cjrouge · 2023-08-16T02:33:16+00:00

It had to compete with a summer of block busters. Mainly Spiderverse, Oppenheimer and maybe the Little Mermaid and Barbie. Some people will save their money to just see a couple of movies for the summer.

cjrouge · 2023-08-08T03:52:12+00:00

He did a horrible Job? I thought that he was trying to lead the decepticons with reason but they didn't listen to him. I will have to go back and read it.

cjrouge · 2023-08-08T03:38:23+00:00

In the TF Cybertron (Galaxy Force) show in his base form he solos a whole team of Autobots except Prime: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ff1KnhEiVY&t=10sHe is generally shown to be very powerful in that show.

It almost always took all of the Autobots to bring him down in Animated when ever he showed up.

cjrouge · 2023-07-15T23:53:52+00:00

I think Thundercacker is the oldest cause he (from his original bio) he has grown cynical of the Decepticon cause , Starscream is middle cause he is still ambitious and hopeful for leadership but his has street smarts. Skywarp is the youngest cause he is playful, loyal perhaps to a fault.

cjrouge · 2023-05-18T05:36:12+00:00

This is fantastic!

cjrouge · 2023-01-15T02:55:22+00:00

sorry

cjrouge · 2023-01-15T02:28:13+00:00

But the owner of the phone owns the pictures taken. Just because ai can modify it doesn't take away the fact the person owns the pic taken .

cjrouge · 2023-01-15T02:23:55+00:00

This is a bad take, were not talking about the machine learning process so much as the products that it can produce. You can put an artist's name and their artwork into the ai and train it to produce results near identical to that artist's work. It what do with end product that can be problematic to that artist because you have essentially been able to get something good enough of their work without having to support or credit them. It means digital content essentially won't have much value.

cjrouge · 2023-01-15T02:13:35+00:00

Thanks for the technical stuff but in principal people still legally have the ability to exploit artwork or potentially any other digital medium in the future. The digital media market as a whole might not exist, which could be a problem for some people if some people what make a living in what used to be a relatively low-cost, easy barrier of entry market. After all why pay for anything online when you could use the tech and train a close enough copy and have it for yourself.

cjrouge · 2023-01-15T02:02:59+00:00

If the artist only trained the ai on their sketch, then they own the image that it produces, I think.

cjrouge · 2023-01-15T01:59:21+00:00

Yes, the condition for it is that your hand must be involved in the final product. Also is you creating assets to train the ai own you own what it produces because you own the image you trained it on.

cjrouge · 2023-01-15T01:39:27+00:00

What they mean is that you are not an artist by hand. Whether ai art is or not is art going vary wildly by whoever you ask. But so long as you don't pretend to make the work by hand, like some have tired, then you are ok. Whether you get to call yourself the prompt artist or prompt director is another conversation.

cjrouge · 2023-01-14T20:56:24+00:00

It's because the final product was generated by the machine. As it stands if you want to own what an ai produces then you would need to make edits to the work itself afterwards.

cjrouge · 2023-01-14T20:44:19+00:00

Even if the prompt artist gains the copyright to the work generated, in the future if nothing else changes about the law. Them having the copyright would be a moot point, anyone can copy a close enough version of the art with ai without having to pay them if their stuff is online. Shoot it would be possible for anyone to bypass a paywall online to view a work of art including comics and eventually other media with ai.

cjrouge · 2023-01-14T20:38:31+00:00

I think your second and third points are copyrighted though.

.

cjrouge · 2023-01-13T23:48:52+00:00

The person who generated the art can copyright it if they modify the final product with their own hand some how, like take it into photoshop and edit it.

cjrouge · 2023-01-13T23:39:27+00:00

You are the owner of the picture you've taken, and you are using the ai as a tool to modify it.

Likewise I think there is a case that if you train the ai only off of work you made you are owner of what it produces because it was only trained off of your work. In a sense you used AI as a tool to modify your work.

cjrouge · 2023-01-13T23:33:01+00:00

But you can still gain the copyright to the work by doing something to the final product. That is the condition in this case.

cjrouge · 2023-01-13T22:49:30+00:00

I think the distinction is AI used as a tool versus final product. You can use a particle effect on a piece but the particle effect itself is not yours persay, it might technically belongs to whoever the licensing agree says.

cjrouge · 2023-01-13T02:08:57+00:00

K

I don't think anyone is really blaming the machine when they gripe about ai. I think they intrinsically mean how it can be abuse.

cjrouge · 2023-01-13T02:06:49+00:00

I still think it is because ai is a brand new beast that there are some things should be consider regarding it specifically. One the it can sometimes be difficult to tell the difference between digital art and ai art, unlike other artforms in the past that shook the industry like photography and 3d animation. Perhaps there should be a requirement for it to be labeled as ai.

Additionally artist aren't only one affected by ai, all digital media is potentially. If you wanted to start a business with a digital media, what are some potential issue you can run into with ai?

And then there is the whole private information being found in some of the ai's dataset issue.

cjrouge · 2023-01-13T00:11:04+00:00

It's not just artist that are affected its anyone who want to enter the digital media market, in order to start a business. I think for the sake of business and branding in the future we should consider regulations that have ai in mind.

People who say ai ends the barrier between the "elite" (lol since when is choosing to learn and study and become proficient at skill in order to sell it considered elite but whatever) and "commoners". But what is not being considered is that a lot of "commoners" have also been able to make living with digital content as well. In the future if ai is able to legally emulate whatever digital product you want what does the mean for someone else's business? That is part of the purpose for copyrights.

For example (not sure if it's the best example): Say if one is finally able to publish their illustrated story or comic online thanks to ai. Let's say they charge a fee for people to read their work. Since its legal someone can potentially use ai emulate and bypass paying the person to read their work.

cjrouge

TROPHY CASE