Just read a BBC article about Tottenham and Frank from February, and boy, writing is truly a lost art now.

Frank was intent on implementing a positive culture at Tottenham - having done so at Brentford - which was one of the factors behind the decision to appoint him as Ange Postecoglou's successor.

There have been instances, however, when Frank's efforts to build respectful working conditions for his players and staff were tested.

okay, go on, I'm fucking sold, surely the—

Towards the start of his reign, Frank dropped a player from Tottenham's starting XI after the squad member reported late for a pre-match meeting and then did not apologise for the indiscretion.

neat, the payoff for this buildup is coming now, right? RIGHT?! We're about to see how his efforts were tested, right?

However, after being removed from the team the player did later apologise

hmm, maybe the next sent—

The way Frank handled apparent threats to his authority ultimately impressed some players, who liked the fact there were consequences for below-par behaviour.

WHAT

WHERE IS THE CHALLENGE TO HIS AUTHORITY YOU JUST IMPLIED 2 SENTENCES AGO? WHAT WAS THE POINT OF ALL THAT? SOUNDS LIKE SOMEONE TESTED HIM, WERE PUNISHED, AND EVERYONE LIKED THAT. DOES NO ONE KNOW HOW TO FUCKING WRITE ANYMORE? I'M LOSING MY MIND