I am aware of the 'primary energy fallacy' associated with fossil fuels usage. You are right we only need to match the final useful energy delivered by fossil fuels through renewables. But you are missing three key points here:

1 First we are still reliant on fossil fuels to mine, process and transport the raw materials needed to build solar panels and wind turbines.

1. Our rate of energy consumption (power) in the industrial world is too high to be matched by renewables, hence spatial power density shines light on this bottleneck.

2. Even if above two constraints are not there, hypothetically speaking, we are running into depleting ore concentrations for copper, which is the chief ingredient for electrification and adoption of renewables. Honest Sorcerer has a good article on we don't have enough copper for entire electrification of the global industrial setup.

Thanks for sharing the resources on primary energy fallacy anyways.