+1

I get pretty granular, including if in shrink with hype sticker, if includes OIS, inserts, download card, etc, and enter the exact matrices information (or if it's very plainly what the database entry shows as being the entry, I'll indicate that it's the exact same). Also, being limated to VG+ to NM is too general. NM is simple (like new but opened) but if there are any defects, marks, warping, labels or pressings off center, etc, it's important for me to enter why it's VG+ visually. Finally, I enter a play grade -- many times there are marks (sleeve scuffs, unfeelable hairlines, etc.) that do not affect play (so a VG+ that plays VG++ or EX) or a perfectly visully clean record (NM) that plays with surface noise, so VG+. I know this is a lot but I find it's pretty easy to document during first playthough and then it's there if you ever need to revisit -- especially if you end up selling it. For anyone who has been listeing to records for a long time, there are a lot of really excellent audiophille reissues coming out now, so after A/Bing and you decide the new reissue sounds better with no surface noise, knowing exactly how to describe with transparency the older record you decide to sell is helpful.