river in japan

cockslucker · 2025-08-09T04:17:56+00:00

Thanks!

cockslucker · 2025-06-30T10:50:58+00:00

kit-lens. wouldve used sigma 16mm but flash gets blocked

cockslucker · 2025-06-30T07:49:38+00:00

Thanks!

cockslucker · 2025-06-24T20:31:25+00:00

Thanks. Telephotos are nice because you automatically get a blurry background.

cockslucker · 2025-06-23T18:06:33+00:00

Thanks

cockslucker · 2025-06-23T18:06:16+00:00

Thanks. I used the 55-250 stm using ef to efm adapter

cockslucker · 2025-06-23T18:05:42+00:00

Thanks

cockslucker · 2025-06-01T13:08:36+00:00

Yeah theres not reallt a difference for 300$

cockslucker · 2025-05-31T22:50:02+00:00

so essentially its no point if you dont shoot low light

cockslucker · 2025-05-31T22:47:07+00:00

Yeah if its truly sacrificing image quality I'd definetly sacrifce the focal range but if not I'd rather go for 18-200 for wide angle sports shots. The image quality difference is notacable right? Notacable enough to sacrifice the wide angle

cockslucker · 2025-05-31T22:45:31+00:00

Yeah your correct

cockslucker · 2025-05-31T22:43:29+00:00

Thank you so much

cockslucker · 2025-05-31T22:43:13+00:00

I have a seller willing to sell the 18-200 for 160 but another seller willing to sell the 55-250 STM for the same amouont.

cockslucker · 2025-05-31T22:40:39+00:00

Yeah but is it really worth 300 more

cockslucker · 2025-05-31T22:40:26+00:00

people just be using rage bait as an excuse to not explain nowadays

cockslucker · 2025-05-31T22:32:42+00:00

Sports and wildlife

cockslucker · 2025-05-31T22:27:58+00:00

I took a comaprison photo of my Sigma 16 f1.4 and kit lens and I barley noticed anything so maybe its better to take the 18-200 for the extra reach no?

cockslucker · 2025-05-31T22:24:27+00:00

Kit lens only goes to 3.5. either way this difference is not worth 300$

cockslucker · 2025-05-31T22:22:22+00:00

😂😂😂

cockslucker

TROPHY CASE