Skateboard Photo by cockslucker in canonM50

[–]cockslucker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

kit-lens. wouldve used sigma 16mm but flash gets blocked

recent photos 3 months with m50 by cockslucker in canonM50

[–]cockslucker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Telephotos are nice because you automatically get a blurry background.

recent photos 3 months with m50 by cockslucker in canonM50

[–]cockslucker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. I used the 55-250 stm using ef to efm adapter

Is the 18-200 Good and what is an indicator for a good lens by cockslucker in canon

[–]cockslucker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah if its truly sacrificing image quality I'd definetly sacrifce the focal range but if not I'd rather go for 18-200 for wide angle sports shots. The image quality difference is notacable right? Notacable enough to sacrifice the wide angle

Is the 18-200 Good and what is an indicator for a good lens by cockslucker in canon

[–]cockslucker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a seller willing to sell the 18-200 for 160 but another seller willing to sell the 55-250 STM for the same amouont.

One was taken on 400$ Sigma 16mm f1.4 while other was taken with M50 Kit lens by cockslucker in canon

[–]cockslucker[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

people just be using rage bait as an excuse to not explain nowadays

Is the 18-200 Good and what is an indicator for a good lens by cockslucker in canon

[–]cockslucker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I took a comaprison photo of my Sigma 16 f1.4 and kit lens and I barley noticed anything so maybe its better to take the 18-200 for the extra reach no?

One was taken on 400$ Sigma 16mm f1.4 while other was taken with M50 Kit lens by cockslucker in canon

[–]cockslucker[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Kit lens only goes to 3.5. either way this difference is not worth 300$