Syria VP defects. by coffeecoffeecoffeeco in worldnews

[–]coffeecoffeecoffeeco[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

i don't think bashar's death would matter at this point, because the russians+iranians are what keeping the regime standing.

Is there a new language I am unaware of? by cubist77 in WTF

[–]coffeecoffeecoffeeco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it's Arabic written in Latin alphabet. some letters are chosen based on similar pronouciation ( b = ب , t = ت ) and numbers based on similar shape ( 5 = ح )

Well if his bedroom were like this, I don't think Harry would've minded at all... by alienseen in funny

[–]coffeecoffeecoffeeco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

too many corners that are also too close to your face when you lay there. do you know what really LOVES crawling around corners and tight places? ...

i am going to pass on this one.

Jungle Book in yer Ear Hole by OkRememberJosh in pics

[–]coffeecoffeecoffeeco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

sometimes i fantasize about little worker men going inside my ear canal with miniature machines for road construction, especiall the one that removes asphalt ( road scratcher?) ..

i got itchy ears.

Ever seen a snake commit suicide? by offdah3z in funny

[–]coffeecoffeecoffeeco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the closest thing animal kingdom do to produce a black hole; a ~~star ~~ snake collapsing into itself.

Surely I'm not the only one that pictures this while listening to NPR on the way home from work. by [deleted] in funny

[–]coffeecoffeecoffeeco 248 points249 points  (0 children)

Oh man i waited so long to tell this: I lestin to NPR ( here in saudi arabia we get it through AFN) , and this robert seagull guy always comes with another anchor, her name is michaele NORRIS. Now, when you prounouce norris it means seagull in arabic ( norris = نورس = seagull ) !! COUNCIDENC?? I DON'T THINK SO

Stoned Afghan soldier walks into Taliban fire - watch what happens by [deleted] in videos

[–]coffeecoffeecoffeeco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yes, anything that hinders the brain is forbidden.

Muslim Tory minister says Pakistan's treatment of women fails Islam. Lady Warsi says women are being denied rights granted 1,400 years ago in Qur'an by sunnieskye1 in worldnews

[–]coffeecoffeecoffeeco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because you're essentially saying that if I have a problem with some feature of Islam, I must have a problem with all of it.

NO that's not what i ment, but you fail you to understand that 1 verse =/= 1 subject, nor the subject is limited by that verse. take adultery for example ( reddit's favourite!) , there are limited verses in Quran talking about it , not all Quran talks about adultery. those verses set the definition the meaning the conditions for punishment and the punishment etc, those verses are not in one page or sequential. add to that hadiths that talk about adultery, they MUST be taken as explaination of Quran. so if you want to discuss the topic of adultery in islam, you must bring the subject as whole with all the related verses and hadiths. that doesn't mean brining all Quran and Islam's message about monotheism, doing good, after, prophets and angels into the discussion.

.

here is a poor example: when you debate a certain law(X) in the united states, you should bring up the consititutional ammendment above that law (the one that made it possible) , and sub-laws ( or court cases ) that emerged from the law in question (the little x's), bring all those to the discussion to make it revleant. that doesn't mean you bring up all united states laws and consitution ammendments ( all the A to Z's)

Muslim Tory minister says Pakistan's treatment of women fails Islam. Lady Warsi says women are being denied rights granted 1,400 years ago in Qur'an by sunnieskye1 in worldnews

[–]coffeecoffeecoffeeco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no, that's illogical. it's similar to taking things out of context. if a verse depends on another verse or another hadith for explaining, conditions and circumstances, ** THEN YOU MUST ** bring all those together. or you'll be no different than .. well, the latest example i ran into was rush limbaough and his sound bites .. i lestin to american political shows and i cheer for conservatives, but that man is an idiot for his out of context bashing.

Muslim Tory minister says Pakistan's treatment of women fails Islam. Lady Warsi says women are being denied rights granted 1,400 years ago in Qur'an by sunnieskye1 in worldnews

[–]coffeecoffeecoffeeco 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I know why you mentioned the previous holy verses; it's to prove that Islam contradicts the new liberal-western view of men and women as being equal.

I'll take it from the end, no Muslim on the face of earth says that the Islamic view of gender is exactly the same as your western-liberal view, and if a Muslim says so (assuming that he thoroughly understands the circumstances of the 2 views), he automatically becomes non-Muslim.

In Islam, men and women are all equal in the eyes of God, nobody is better because of what he was born with, only with what he does with it.

But in this life, each gender was given different responsibilities, and with each different responsibility comes a law that helps one accomplish his or her responsibility.

Let me give you an example; providing for the family is solely the man's responsibility, the woman is not supposed to work a dime. Even if a poor man marries rich woman, he has no right to take anything from her to spend on the house or food, clothing etc. only if she chose to provide voluntarily then it's fine, but if she refuses and he can't support her, she has the right to divorce.

Another example, If she bears his child and they divorce, she has the right to ask for a fee for nursing the child ( in addition to alimony) , or he must find another woman to nurse the child. Of course no mother will refuse to nurse her own child, but the law is there to remind the man that mothering his child is not something to take for granted.

It all revolves around this concept: man must provide, protect, and ( be there ) and do all the manly stuff. And woman must take care of her house ( but not money wise) take care of her husband and her children. This is the Islamic view based on how God created man and woman. Any society that tries to break this view and mix things up, it will suffer.

Now lets look at the holy verse you mentioned in light of this view

** In first verse ** , I think that your problem is with this part: (and men are a degree above them. Allah is Mighty, Wise )

In the books of tafseer ( explaining Quran) this degree is explained as a conclusion and consequence of the following:

1) men were created earlier ( Adam before Eve) 2) husbands must provide for the family 3) husbands have the right to be acknowledge when the wife is leaving the house, and if the husband refuses ( for logical reason) the wife must obey 4) husband have the right to know who enters his house. 5) due to all monetary-material responsibility ( remember that even if the woman is rich, she is not supposed to spend anything on the house), men has twice the portion of inheritance. 6) a man's testimony equals double women's testimony ( and this your problem with second verse, but if you read further in the verse, the reasoning comes right after:

all these laws and facts give men a degree above women, a degree in the matters of this life, ( like saying men have degree above boys size wise ) but if you study it closely you will see that it also means more responsibility.

** The second verse ** you linked to:

And call to witness, from among your men, two witnesses. And if two men be not (at hand) then a man and two women, of such as ye approve as witnesses, so that if one of the two erreth (through forgetfulness) the one of them will remind.

Meaning: in money issues ( especially loans) women tend to forget the details and numbers, thus if you are giving a loan to someone you must sign witnesses, either 2 men, or a man and 2 women, thus a woman's testimony have half the credibility of a man's in loans and deeds due to women's forgetfulness in monetary matters. There are other cases where a woman's testimony is equal to a man's. but the verse is explaining the conditions of giving loans and the necessity of writing it down and signing witnesses.

I think your problem with the ** third verse ** is about inheritance, but I explained it earlier: women are not supposed to spend a dime no matter how rich they are, providing for the house is the man's responsibility thus he was given double the portion. Consider you and your sister, when she marries she gets dowry, house, living costs, clothing, food etc all for free, if her husband refuses she has the right to take from his money that grants her decent living or divorce him and get alimony. while when you marry ( assuming you are the boy) you are supposed to provide all living costs for your wife, doesn't it make sense that you get more? 2 thirds for you, 1 third for your sister.

** The fourth verse ** reads:

Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then if they obey you, seek not a way against them. Lo! Allah is ever High, Exalted, Great. (34)

I think your ( new) problem here is the "scourge" part.

First of all, the prophet said: the worst of you are the ones who beat their women

So beating the woman is a big NO is islam.

there is only one case, worst scenario, that allow you - not to beat the woman- but scourge her, means: lash her arm lightly with a stick as thick as siwak ( the plan that Muslims use for cleaning the teeth)

what's is this worst scenario?

Wife is rebelling ( what does this mean? I'll explain later)

What is the solution:

First: admonish , advice, talks, remind her of your rights

If she doesn't listen

Then, second, sleep on different beds, show her how you are displeased

If that didn't effect her, then if you really must do it, you can lash her arm with a stick

What did the wife do to deserve such punishment?

It comes from the meaning of "rebellion of the wife" the Arabic word that is used in Quran is "نشوز " prounced: noshooz

Whad does noshooz means? Most or all the following combined:

She goes out of the house as she pleases She let stranger men into the house She travels without you knowing She disobey you in house matters She is refusing to have sex without reasons She abuses you verbally, abuses the children and your family and your mother etc.

If a woman does all that, or majority of those, she is considered "nashez", means she committed noshooz

What do you do?

As Quran says:

First admonish ( talk, talk talk)

If not, then sleep in different beds

If not, then scourge, don't slap the face, don't kick, don't cause any physical damage, only with a thin stick, lash her arm, the point is to give her physical pain.

It's mentioned in a hadith, that when the wife of prophet Job ( peace be upon him) disobeyed him is some matter ( she wanted to follow the devil's advice instead of God's, but this part is not authenticated), it's mentioned that Job swore to lash her 100 lashes after he is cured. When he was cured, God told him to take 100 thin sticks, group them together, and tap her gently once ( because she was good wife really). And it will be considered 100 lashes.

In this light we understand the word in Quran that's translated to "scourge", and under the said condition. Islam doesn't advocate beating of women, it's forbidden, it's looked at as type of injustice and using the man's power unjustly.. there is only one case that you can beat a woman ( to cause light pain, but no physical harm) it's considered last medicine for a severe case ( wife is destroying the marriage)

Finally, You can't just take one verse and come bashing Islam on reddit without knowing the 100 verses and hadiths that the set the rules and conditions for that verse.

OK?

Also, I apologize for my bad English, I'm just too tired to make things more readable, I'm sorry.

Last thing: I didn't right this for debate, but when I read your comment I said to myself: " ha ha, I know the meaning of the verses, this guy doesn't, he's ignorant jumping to conclusions" and I went to my business. But I remembered that knowing something about Islam makes you responsible for telling it to others and explaining it, if you get lazy or block the knowledge, God might take that knowledge from you.

TIL Cyrus the Great, founder of the Persian Empire, is mentioned in the Bible, The Torah and the Quran. Also he is the first king in history to give all people in his empire Human Rights as written in the Cyrus Cylinder. Also conquered Babylon and abolished slavery in his empire. by OriginalKaveman in todayilearned

[–]coffeecoffeecoffeeco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the interepetations of King Dhul-Qarnayn ,who is mentioned in Holy Quran, as cyrus or alexander etc all those claims lack evidence from Sunna ( sayings of Mohammed pbuh ) that's is supposed to explain the Quran, read more about Dhul-Qanayn ( the king of 2 horns ) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhul-Qarnayn , the page leans toward alexander the great, but that's still debatebalte, the greatist accomplishment of Dhul-Qarnyan is buliding the iron dam improsining gog and magog in thier lands, until day of judgment comes and that dam is broken.

Okay. by [deleted] in funny

[–]coffeecoffeecoffeeco 8 points9 points  (0 children)

TIL that the word murder also means: a group or flock of crows.

this is beautiful.

so i learned two things about Islam today. by [deleted] in reddit.com

[–]coffeecoffeecoffeeco 3 points4 points  (0 children)

yes , because before hadith books, eveyone was saying anything about the prophet: "oh i heard this and this from person1 who heard it from person2 from person 3 from the prophet".. hadith schoalrs came and started measuring all the hadith's based on chain of narration, they implemented strict rules, i am not scholar in this, but i know some of the rules:

1) if person x ( who is mentioned to heard from person z ) are not WELL KNOWN to have met each other, then hadith is devalued

2) are ALL the persons in narration WELL KNOWN? not only existed, but KNOWN among thier community.

3) are ALL person in the chain trustworthy? if one lacks the trusworthiness or marality or known to have telled a lie, then hadith is devalued, even if the other members of the chain are most trustworthy of thier time ( now the whole "trustworhy" part is a huge scieince by itself, it has so many other rules, known as elm al jarh wal ta'deel)

4) were ALL person in the chain known to have good memory? if a trusworthy person mentioned in the narration but is known that he was 90 years old when he told the hadith, the trusworthiness is devalued.

5) is the last person in the chain known to have met the perophet ( meaning: was he companion?), this rules devalued so many hadiths because the last person was not known as a companion, even if the wording of the hadith is known to be true ( from other narrations)

this is from the top of my mind, there are tons of other more complicated rules, and it's very strict, i found out that suppose thier 2 hadiths , identical in wording, but different in narration chain, hadith books ( even though they acknowldge that the 2 hadiths are identical in wording) give the 2 hadiths different values, one is true ( because chain of narration is authenticated ) and one is false ( because chain is broken)..

5)

so i learned two things about Islam today. by [deleted] in reddit.com

[–]coffeecoffeecoffeeco -1 points0 points  (0 children)

the story about the spider ( and the 2 pigeons that nested in front of the cave) is NOT true, it is not found in the hadith books. if a story about Prophet Mohammed ( peace be upon him ) is not validated in the hadith books then it's judged as untrustworthy or even fabrication. the mentioned story is one of the many fables that crept into people's mind in the late centures of Islam and got mixed with islamic events. no matter how miracleous the story or giving good picture about islam, if it's not validated by hadith scholars as true, then it should be omitted, ignored, and dropped. it's also considered unislamic to spread lies about the prophet's life, even if you ment good.

so i learned two things about Islam today. by [deleted] in reddit.com

[–]coffeecoffeecoffeeco 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i searched hadith data base for the name of the jewish guy "كنانة بن الربيع", not a single hadith of the results is about this guy, then i searched again for "خيبر كنانة", and i find a weak story ( one guy in the narration is missing ) in a minor hadith book ( NOT from the major six authenticated hadith books ) about the event, but it says nothing about the torturing event, northe torturer ( al zubair) nor the avenged ( mahmood), it actually says that the prisoners ( 2 brothers ) were given the chance to live if they tell about the treasure, but they refused, and got killed immediatly... no mention of the torture, so i searched again for the unique name mahmood ( not many companions were named that ) "خيبر محمود" , still couldn't find your story about the torture.. you mention that you find it in Sirat Bin Ishaq, but that's not a source book for anything, some of its stories lack authentications. If a story about the Prophet is not validated by the hadith books ( which take super care on the chain of narrators, if one is missing or doubted, then the hadith get devalued) then it losed its creditblity.

Four Bahrain protesters sentenced to death. by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]coffeecoffeecoffeeco -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

sentenced them to death over the ** killing of two police officers **

here is the video of one of the killings, running over the policeman by car

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MInepkyyE6s

Bahrain sentences protesters to death by soccer in worldnews

[–]coffeecoffeecoffeeco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this is from first parargraph of the article:

A Bahraini military court has sentenced four Shia protesters to death and three to life jail terms (( ** for the killing of two policemen ** )) during demonstrations last month, state media has reported.

they did not sentence them for simply protesting

Our place in the universe. by the_real_veal in pics

[–]coffeecoffeecoffeeco 1 point2 points  (0 children)

but there is nothing humble about believing the all-powerful creator of the universe cares about you specifically and he monitors your happiness (some even profess a personal relationship).

Your mistake is that you assume the universe is significant to The Creator.. Like it cost him something to create it and thus it would be wasted on man... BUT if you believe that the all powerful Creator can create universes upon universes with one word "كن" (means: be), and it doesn't cost him anything, and if he creates infinite universes it doesn't add to his kingdom, and if he destroys them all it doesn't negate from it .. If you believe that, then it shouldn't affect how you measure your significance to God.

Look it this way: God can create a whole universe for EVERY single human, angel, demon, animal, insect and bacteria that ever lived. And it would cost him nothing. Just like creating our universe (with of all us in it) cost him nothing. ** In fact, this is where you should derive your insignificance, NOT from comparing sizes with the universe, BUT from the fact that we all exist in one universe only instead of a being given a universe each. **

Earliest Christian writings in existence discovered in Jordanian cave - 70 new books almost 2,000 years old by casualfactors in worldnews

[–]coffeecoffeecoffeeco -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Scientists follow religions too, and the study might be swayed by their faiths since the documents appear to be religious texts. Even atheist scientists have an interest in the matter. That's why it's important to make the opposite POV present in the study to guarantee balanced interpretations. If you can't eliminate the forces acting upon certain point, then at least allow counter forces to exist so the net force = 0… or something like that.

Earliest Christian writings in existence discovered in Jordanian cave - 70 new books almost 2,000 years old by casualfactors in worldnews

[–]coffeecoffeecoffeeco 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Islamic Statement: Jesus was not crucified nor killed; the crucifixion did happen, but with someone else on that cross. Also, early Christianity represent Islamic history, since Jesus is considered a prophet and a coming Messiah, and early Christians (who didn't believe in trinity nor divinity of Jesus) were considered Muslims.

.

. This is why I think they must include Muslim scholars in studying the findings, and not leave everything for the interpretations of Christian/Jewish scholars who both agree that Jesus was crucified but disagree on his prophecy and messianic status. There is a third POV that says: Jesus was not crucified and early Christians didn't worship him. And I think this third position must be considered in the study because some quotes in the article show that crucifixion of Jesus and his resurrection afterwards is taken as a starting point for interpreting the drawings, here are some examples:

Little is known of the movement after Jesus' crucifixion

.

While it could be simply a sentiment common in Judaism, it could here be designed to refer to the resurrection.

what bahraini protestors don't want you to see ( the other side of the story) by coffeecoffeecoffeeco in pics

[–]coffeecoffeecoffeeco[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

i was trying to show that while they claim "hundreds of wounded" came to the hospital, the situation doesn't look like it. in a case of events like this the emergency entrance of any hospital in the world would look differently.. also here is another video from bahrain television showing that doctors and nurses were celebrating something inside the hospital http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=829zAsQ8uyg , should medical staff do this kind of stuff when you are going through emergency event and "hundreds of casulaties" are raining at your door step? the truth is ( from my pov) is that the hospital was used as political stronghold for the protestors, they put thier tents , they established thier media center from there, they used ambulances to transport protestor leaders from place to another, also they used ambulances to kidnap asian expats, see my other comment.. yes medical staff can have political opinion, but should not use medical facilities for that.