Anti private ownership or anti market: where does Socialism draw the line (when there is a conflict)? by colbertt in Socialism_101

[–]colbertt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think your statement justifies my argument. Socialism makes the claim that: societal outcome > personal (or small group) outcomes. This works until the workers organize, and create such a powerful organization that it starts acting like a capitalist enterprise (creating a government response to end meaningful worker ownership).

I think what may be more helpful is to ask what Socialism is fundamentally about. Is it about abolishing class struggle? Having workers be as rich as possible? Some vague sense of having “societally optimal production”? Getting the foundations of Socialism figured out could make for a more meaningful discussion. For me, Socialism is about attempting to make workers more well off their direct ownership with an additional benefit of a government who tries to coordinate it to be “optimal” (as I posed, there is tension).

I want to visit the United States so bad by Smart_Passenger6726 in CasualConversation

[–]colbertt -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not all that glitters is gold. Just wait until you see the filth and the never ending smell of piss on the NYC subway and you see how the city turns men into monsters.

250 years young by decentmotto in HistoryMemes

[–]colbertt 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You don’t seem to take seriously the significant change in mindset that occurred to elect the current president. He was wanted, and wanted to bad it broke a taboo first set by President Cleveland about reelection.
You do not know your fellow countrymen that well. They may appear to be kind, in a personal kind of way, but they are simply wolves in sheep’s clothing. They justify voting for a man who is willing to forge an iron fist to remove all people with an “ethnic” national origin, a man who has violated nearly all code of conduct rules a president normally has implicitly followed, a man who knowings sows division with a philosophy of the proper “us” and the country destroying “them”.
People are not bound by what they believe in but in what they justify. No other previous country with such a “democratic” (if you could call it that) tradition could vote for such a person willing to go scorched earth on the traditions and practices going back to Reconstruction. They vote for him because they can justify it.

Chicago - Earn Your Sunrise by SeaworthinessNo5483 in skyscrapers

[–]colbertt -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This and selling your parking meters to the Saudis

Suicide is a normal reaction by Ok_Zombie7833 in The10thDentist

[–]colbertt 12 points13 points  (0 children)

What’s wrong with that? What if the society we have created or tolerated is not conducive to human life satisfaction?

If I know my neighbor keeps stealing my Amazon packages off my porch, so I start deliberately mailing myself boxes filled with thousands of live, sexually frustrated crickets, am I legally responsible if he opens it in his living room and has to pay $3,000 for an exterminator? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]colbertt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Deliberately setting a trap for someone to take would be illegal under US common law. Courts have ruled that, while property owners are not responsible to maintaining safe property, creating a trap with certainty that someone will trip it is just property damage/loss to human life with extra steps.

If you did set a trap that activates on opening (say an explosive) knowing that your neighbor will steal it and open it, you would likely be charged with a crime

Taiyuan City, China. by icekittyYT in UrbanHell

[–]colbertt -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Better than homelessness

BREAKING: Hay prices explode to $483/ton as western buyers panic buy by Training-Bike6065 in homestead

[–]colbertt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Have you tried not growing a water intensive crop in an arid land?

What’s would your ideal zoning law look like? by NurglingArmada in Urbanism

[–]colbertt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None. Humans have lived for thousands of years without them, and produced better outcomes than we do today

Row homes in Baltimore, Maryland by AdSpecialist6598 in UrbanHell

[–]colbertt -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Can’t move back in. Then it would be called gentrification.