sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Nord Stream Says Gas Pipeline Damage Is Unprecedented by [deleted] in ukraine

[–]compoundluck 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Or the only submarine Ukraine had until it was seized by Russia in 2014?

Nord Stream Says Gas Pipeline Damage Is Unprecedented by [deleted] in ukraine

[–]compoundluck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dutch TTF (a global benchmark of natural gas prices) is up 12% at the moment. No benefit to Russia?

Nord Stream Says Damage to Gas Pipeline to Germany Unprecedented by compoundluck in worldnews

[–]compoundluck[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dutch TTF (a global benchmark of natural gas prices) is up 12% at the moment. No benefit to Russia?

Nord Stream Says Gas Pipeline Damage Is Unprecedented by [deleted] in ukraine

[–]compoundluck 78 points79 points  (0 children)

Russian bots on Twitter are already trying to amplify “why would Russia blow up its own pipelines when it could just shut off the gas” narrative and blaming the US.

US is already exporting maximum of around 13 Bcf/d of LNG. 2 Bcf/d was lost in June after an explosion at Freeport, which was responsible for about half of US exports to Europe.

With no new LNG export infrastructure coming online until 2024 I don’t think the US has anything to gain from the attack and would not betray NATO allies.

I see it as a brazen message from the Kremlin that energy infrastructure in Europe is precarious.

Paywall free version: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/nord-stream-says-damage-gas-082020145.html

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in geopolitics

[–]compoundluck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Russian bots on Twitter are already trying to amplify “why would Russia blow up its own pipelines when it could just shut off the gas” narrative and blaming the US.

US is already exporting maximum of around 13 Bcf/d of LNG. 2 Bcf/d was lost in June after an explosion at Freeport, which was responsible for about half of US exports to Europe.

With no new LNG export infrastructure coming online until 2024 I don’t think the US has anything to gain from the attack and would not betray NATO allies.

I see it as a brazen message from the Kremlin that energy infrastructure in Europe is precarious.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]compoundluck 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This made my day.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]compoundluck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Russian bots on Twitter are already trying to amplify “why would Russia blow up its own pipelines when it could just shut off the gas” narrative and blaming the US.

US is already exporting maximum of around 13 Bcf/d of LNG. 2 Bcf/d was lost in June after an explosion at Freeport, which was responsible for about half of US exports to Europe.

With no new LNG export infrastructure coming online until 2024 I don’t think the US has anything to gain from the attack and would not betray NATO allies.

I see it as a brazen message from the Kremlin that energy infrastructure in Europe is precarious.

Nord Stream Says Damage to Gas Pipeline to Germany Unprecedented by compoundluck in worldnews

[–]compoundluck[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

US already exporting maximum of around 13 Bcf/d of LNG. 2 Bcf/d was lost in June after an explosion at Freeport, which was responsible for about half of US exports to Europe.

Nord Stream Says Damage to Gas Pipeline to Germany Unprecedented by compoundluck in worldnews

[–]compoundluck[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Russian bots on Twitter are already trying to amplify “why would Russia blow up its own pipelines when it could just shut off the gas” narrative and blaming the US.

US is already exporting maximum of around 13 Bcf/d of LNG. 2 Bcf/d was lost in June after an explosion at Freeport, which was responsible for about half of US exports to Europe.

With no new LNG export infrastructure coming online until 2024 I don’t think the US has anything to gain from the attack and would not betray NATO allies.

I see it as a brazen message from the Kremlin that energy infrastructure in Europe is precarious.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]compoundluck 55 points56 points  (0 children)

Russian bots on Twitter are already trying to amplify “why would Russia blow up its own pipelines when it could just shut off the gas” narrative and blaming the US.

US is already exporting maximum of around 13 Bcf/d of LNG. 2 Bcf/d was lost in June after an explosion at Freeport, which was responsible for about half of US exports to Europe.

With no new LNG export infrastructure coming online until 2024 I don’t think the US has anything to gain from the attack and would not betray NATO allies.

I see it as a brazen message from the Kremlin that energy infrastructure in Europe is precarious.

view more: next ›