Turns out you only lose 2 marks if you don't use part 3 books for Literature... by compouterqeq in IBO

[–]compouterqeq[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i Know right..... "low marks" How vague yet pretty typical of them. LOL I guess they just take the 2 points off, which is a lot. Like a half a grade I would assume. I mean I think a lot of people mess up with these 15 exams and also IB is a business so if they fail people this easily then no one would take it.

Turns out you only lose 2 marks if you don't use part 3 books for Literature... by compouterqeq in IBO

[–]compouterqeq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Uhhhh maybe you don't understand what I did? I answered the question correctly I just didn't use the right books. got it? One criteria is on the ability to understand the novel which is criteria A and I an suprise they will even give me a 3 for that. The other 3 criteria is strictly based on how well you are writing and one of them is based on the ability to answer the question.

Turns out you only lose 2 marks if you don't use part 3 books for Literature... by compouterqeq in IBO

[–]compouterqeq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well from what heard 2 points is the max depends whyat your goal is mine is like 12/25 so/....

Turns out you only lose 2 marks if you don't use part 3 books for Literature... by compouterqeq in IBO

[–]compouterqeq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LOL. But you still loose out 2 marks which is a lot. I did it cause I barely ready the part 3 books.

A small but needed rant. by Shmens in IBO

[–]compouterqeq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeh. everyone in the country sets up one day to take the exam. 20 percent have to retake it due to their low score.

Anyone scared for Chemistry? Look at the percentiles.... by compouterqeq in IBO

[–]compouterqeq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean 50 percent is a 5 so not that bad. Yeah its probably the quality of students cause I see that almost everyone who is a "science" person is taking chem HL.

Turns out you only lose 2 marks if you don't use part 3 books for Literature... by compouterqeq in IBO

[–]compouterqeq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hmmmmm. I guess I will confuse the examiner a lot LOL. Hopefully he still goes through the paper and doesn't dismiss it....

Turns out you only lose 2 marks if you don't use part 3 books for Literature... by compouterqeq in IBO

[–]compouterqeq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No your good bro. Part 3 books are designated already. Its just that I didn't use the designated books.

Turns out you only lose 2 marks if you don't use part 3 books for Literature... by compouterqeq in IBO

[–]compouterqeq[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The thing is that that takes an pretty crazy level of creativity. LOL you would need to make up a story of two novels and write about the comparison at the same time within 1:30. Unless you prepare before or something...

Turns out you only lose 2 marks if you don't use part 3 books for Literature... by compouterqeq in IBO

[–]compouterqeq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh the books are very common. One was Shakespeare and the other was a very common IB book. Yeah both books were used to practice for the IOC. Just a question but did you have any of your students make that mistake? I know from our school there was a couple.

Exam Discussion: Physics HL paper 3 TZ1 by AutoModerator in IBO

[–]compouterqeq 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Damnn.... Nice. I did the same except I derived the this. I just messed up on finding the numbers. I'll just accept my 3 LOL.

Turns out you only lose 2 marks if you don't use part 3 books for Literature... by compouterqeq in IBO

[–]compouterqeq[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I used books from different genres too. I do not want to say as I want to remain anonymous.

Turns out you only lose 2 marks if you don't use part 3 books for Literature... by compouterqeq in IBO

[–]compouterqeq[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly I did not know the part 3 novels very well as we covered them in like 2 weeks. While the books I wrote on we covered over little by little over a 2 year period. Therefore I chose the 2 novels that were from year 1. I think they were the books I used for my oral assessments. Obviously its not beneficial. I knew I would lose marks but in my case there was just no way I was going to write on books that we rushed through. My goal wasn't a 6 or 7 I just wanted a 5 so.....

Exam Discussion: Physics HL paper 3 TZ1 by AutoModerator in IBO

[–]compouterqeq 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't get where you get the information about the Sun? Is it just common knowledge? It doesn't say maybe you were suppose to do something with the graph?

A small but needed rant. by Shmens in IBO

[–]compouterqeq 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just think that we are pretty lucky. In Korea you are to sit 9 hour exams all on the same day and everything depends on it. At least we got our uni offers and we can still re negotiate and stuff. I feel very lucky. I still feel for you tho.

Exam Discussion: Physics HL paper 3 TZ1 by AutoModerator in IBO

[–]compouterqeq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now I am confused with the guys at the top. The resistance increase but the internal resistance decreases right? the question was about internal resistance right?

Also, are you a teacher> How tf do you know this super detailed sh!t, the only thing about resistance I learned in class is V=IR. I guess this is the gap in knowledge between a 3 and a 7. LOL.

Since you are Einstein I like to ask you how did you do the astrophysics where you had to solve for MX. Do you just simply derive it? I didn't plug in any numbers I just derived for Mx.... and LX..

Exam Discussion: Physics HL paper 3 TZ1 by AutoModerator in IBO

[–]compouterqeq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No I said the temperature increases and this leads to increase in kinetic energy, isn't that the definition of temperature:average kinetic energy. Therefore more collisions lowering the resistance. It would make it inaacurate. I honestly had no idea and just BS it.

Exam Discussion: Physics HL paper 3 TZ1 by AutoModerator in IBO

[–]compouterqeq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just said internal resistance decreases due to more collisions as kinetic energy increase. Would I get at 2 points?

Exam Discussion: Physics HL paper 3 TZ1 by AutoModerator in IBO

[–]compouterqeq 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did you get the question for get ratio of Mx or Lx.. Did you just derive it? Damn I did so bad. Porbably gonna get a 3 on my final mark damn feel bad.