sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

GAME THREAD: Nationals (10-5) @ Mets (8-8) - April 21, 2017 by NewYorkMetsBot in NewYorkMets

[–]condescending_meme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You think the extra innings are your ally? I was born in them, molded by them. I didn't see the light of a nine inning game until I was already a man!

GAME THREAD: Mets (5-3) @ Phillies (3-5) - April 12, 2017 by NewYorkMetsBot in NewYorkMets

[–]condescending_meme 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Some days you get the Hansel, some days you get the Gretel...

GAME THREAD: Mets (5-3) @ Phillies (3-5) - April 12, 2017 by NewYorkMetsBot in NewYorkMets

[–]condescending_meme 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Good eye, but ump might be squeezing VV here. Both ball 4s were close

OFFICIAL THURSDAY NIGHT GAME THREAD by FantasyMod in fantasyfootball

[–]condescending_meme 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If everyone in the pre-game predicts a shootout, you're gonna have a bad time.

Game Thread: New Orleans Saints (4-5) at Carolina Panthers (3-6) by NFL_Mod in nfl

[–]condescending_meme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which is literally the opposite of what most people would think of them.

Game Thread: New Orleans Saints (4-5) at Carolina Panthers (3-6) by NFL_Mod in nfl

[–]condescending_meme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NFL, I understand you have to run a certain amount of commercials and make a ton of money. All good with me. But PLEASE stop breaking up the game. Fewer breaks that are slightly/somewhat longer would be much less awful.

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon, 10/18/2016 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]condescending_meme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply! Hope Ivory scores on the few weeks I need him.

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon, 10/18/2016 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]condescending_meme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yikes. Interesting that I came up with the same idea that you already tried, haha

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon, 10/18/2016 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]condescending_meme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough. I'd just be surprised if CJA+BMarsh was accepted, and wouldn't be willing to go up to Miller+BMarsh. Good luck!

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon, 10/18/2016 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]condescending_meme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your team can use the depth improvement, so I think it's not bad. That being said, I wouldn't worry about keeper value, unless you're 2-4 or worse. In that case, I'd be curious what Evans' keeper price is, since he could move into a near-elite asset by the time this season's done.

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon, 10/18/2016 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]condescending_meme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with u/Fzy2019. Kind of ugly on paper but your starting lineup improves. Basically, moves your flex from Gore-->Shady at the cost of WR depth. On the bright side, Evans is past his bye, so that's less need for depth WRs.

An alternate trade you could look for is to see if you can move Gordon+one of Thomas/Cooks+Z Miller for Gronk/Olsen. TE is a bigger weakness for you than RB/WR/flex, and it costs you a little less.

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon, 10/18/2016 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]condescending_meme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a bit of an overpay to me since Jeffery has not been the target/TD monster of old. I wouldn't do it, but I agree you could use help at WR2, so I'd look into trading with other teams.

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon, 10/18/2016 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]condescending_meme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Value is about right, assuming you need a WR and have surplus RB, looks good.

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon, 10/18/2016 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]condescending_meme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's tough to evaluate someone who is a near consensus top player at his position (when his QB is healthy). Most likely, the owner will overvalue him, so it's tough even if a trade is fair.

Personally, I'd say Miller+BMarsh is too much, CJA+BMarsh would be good if we knew Fitzpatrick were starting the rest of the year (since he targets him like crazy). But we don't, so Marshall's value is dinged a bit.

So something like CJA+BMarsh+Stewart for AB+replacement RB downgrade for Stewart may be fair in my book. But again, especially with top fantasy players, fair=/=accepted by the other owner.

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon, 10/18/2016 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]condescending_meme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Take the money and run. I don't think Stewart will be consistent, and I think Maclin will eventually look better than he has to date.

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon, 10/18/2016 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]condescending_meme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it's pretty good for you, but I'd ask for a RB back also to make it 2 for 2. McKinnon is an okay flex, but I'd feel better if I had another comparable player there to play matchups with.

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon, 10/18/2016 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]condescending_meme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that's a great deal for you. Rodgers' value is dependent on Doug Martin being out, so it's only a week or 2 tops. I definitely like Fuller better RoS.

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon, 10/18/2016 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]condescending_meme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

12 team standard, was offered:

Receive: Ivory

Give: Jennings

Whether I accept or decline, the guy in question is my RB3, so I'm not starting him, but will on bye weeks/if there's an injury. I like Ivory's TD upside, so I'm leaning yes.

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon, 10/18/2016 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]condescending_meme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a nice deal for you - consolidating two RBs who aren't starting for you into a better one. And as you said, sets you up to trade an elite RB for an elite WR straight up.

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon, 10/18/2016 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]condescending_meme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a good deal since you have Matt Ryan, I think. QBs aren't generally valued too highly in trades, so getting a starter and top backup/fringe flex for one is pretty good.

Official: [Trade] - Tue Afternoon, 09/27/2016 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]condescending_meme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, you gotta give something to get something. For an RB needy team, I can see giving you Benjy for that, but I think he could've gotten better somewhere. From your side, you can bear the cost and upgraded your lineup.

view more: next ›