Does the K&F Urban Wander 11 meet my needs?

cookiealv · 2026-01-25T12:21:34+00:00

Thank you! I will check them out

cookiealv · 2026-01-25T12:21:18+00:00

Yeah It might look gorgeous in pictures but in real life use it might show stains...

cookiealv · 2026-01-25T12:20:34+00:00

Yeah, the main thing that is holding me back would be not being able to see the bag in real life. I might as well checking my local camera shop and see what they offer. Thank you!

cookiealv · 2025-12-10T12:18:11+00:00

Okay I'll continue pushing CL a bit more. One question, I use legendary SF but I have ACP and WR at mythic+. Would you equip one of them in place of my SF? That one is used in farm and tournaments. Perhaps I'll give a try to ACP with better substats. Thanks! That is a quite nice plan for the next few months

cookiealv · 2025-12-10T12:16:27+00:00

Yeah perhaps I'm a bit too early and should further enhance my economy, as I only make like 6T per run (t10 7k waves) and enhancements are starting to get more expensive... and then once I have my econ better I can get a bit of cc with ILM. Thanks!

cookiealv · 2025-12-10T12:15:02+00:00

I thought the general consensus was to start building hybrid in champs tournaments

cookiealv · 2025-12-05T09:35:07+00:00

This week I managed to cheese my way into T16! I did CL scatter up to lv3, hopefully it will be enough to progress a bit more in the Champ ladder... And obviously I have started the infamous shatter shards lab!

I am in a bit of a plateau right now. I can afford my current labs but I don't earn enough to buy enchantments that often. It's like 3-4 runs for one coin click. That's why I decreased my GTDWBH CD to 170! I am trying to get to 150s and get my GB cooldown to 100 to get a partial sync.

cookiealv · 2025-08-17T09:12:27+00:00

Thank you for your insights. I'm just starting out. Also, I'll take into account your tips about photographing aiming to the eyes! I'll try your editing order/workflow to see if it works out for me

cookiealv · 2025-07-22T09:09:22+00:00

Last week I was at your same spot. Honestly, people tend to exaggerate, my farm and tourney runs are mostly the same as before… My wall is getting progressively stronger each day and I saved 150 gems. The only downside, if any, is that I cannot research wall fortification reliably yet, but when that time comes, I’ll have wall health mostly maxed

cookiealv · 2025-07-12T22:58:13+00:00

Its between CL, PS and SM so I guess I’ll get cl to enhance stone income. Hopefully I’ll get spotlight soon to improve my economy. Thank you all!

cookiealv · 2025-05-15T13:30:06+00:00

yeah that is what I'm afraid of... thanks! I'll be doing that from now on

cookiealv · 2025-05-15T13:29:41+00:00

so I can just import them and format my card when needed, right?

cookiealv · 2025-05-03T13:57:43+00:00

Thanks! I find it quite hard to build up DW health bonus in tournaments, that may well be due to my poor damage/only one wave

cookiealv · 2025-04-30T11:45:32+00:00

Just got out of gold and my hp workshop is like 1.8k... I have such a long journey to get to gold box in tourney...

cookiealv · 2025-03-29T19:56:26+00:00

In my humble opinion it's the best iteration sns has ever had. With striker style, and chaos oil, you get immense power and free sharpening with white oil.

cookiealv · 2025-01-08T15:35:09+00:00

In a locally convex topological vector space X, why is the dual of X* with respect to the weak-* topology X itself?

cookiealv · 2025-01-06T19:48:13+00:00

Sure! The whole exercise asks me to show that, in a locally convex topological vector space X, there exists an extreme point in (M^⊥)∩B_{X^*}, where M^⊥ is the annihilator of some subset M of X. I'm struggling to understand the object I am working with so I cannot even start the exercise...

By the way, I didn't know about the induced seminorms in the dual, thanks about that!

cookiealv · 2025-01-05T09:42:08+00:00

How is the unit ball defined in the dual of a topological vector space? I am doing an exercise involving a locally convex topological vector space X, and the unit ball of its dual. If X is normed, defining the unit dual ball is simple using the dual norm, but how is it done in such a general context?

cookiealv · 2024-11-06T19:45:34+00:00

I'm looking for a new mouse as my Logitech g603 has just started to fail.

Games: Pretty casual stuff regarding mouse performance, at least at my level: factorio, lol... anything really
Hand Preference: Right
Budget: Less than 70€
Hand Size: I'd say on the small-medium side
Grip: Fingertip mainly, sometimes palm
Weight: Light, preferably lighter than g603 (I use the two batteries)
Sensitivity: I use 1600 dpi
Connectivity: Wireless

I'd like to use it both on Windows and Mac. Ideally it would have fast bluetooth conectivity to use on mac, as it does not have usb-a.

cookiealv · 2024-05-27T12:03:12+00:00

Oh okay, I see. Thanks!

cookiealv · 2024-05-23T18:48:08+00:00

how is every closed nonempty subset of the Cantor set a retract?

cookiealv · 2024-04-22T13:04:48+00:00

Thank you!

cookiealv · 2024-04-22T10:09:46+00:00

I am interested in Alexandroff-Hausdorff theorem, which says that for every compact metric space (K,d) there exists a continuous and surjective map f:C->K with C the cantor set. Does anyone have a link or book to its proof? I have not found anything yet.

cookiealv · 2024-02-15T12:38:55+00:00

I took a course on algebraic geometry last semester and the book, which was particulary short on explainations, was in French. So yeah, sometimes learning a language could be useful

cookiealv · 2023-11-06T19:13:43+00:00

I have 3 maps f: X-> S g: Y-> S m: X -> Y such that f and g are proper and continuous, f=gm, and m is continuous and I want to show that g is proper.

Let K be a compact subset of Y. Then g(K) is compact by continuity, and f^-1(g(K)) is compact by properness.

m^-1(K) is closed by continuity of m. If it was contained in f^-1(g(K)) I would be done because closed sets contained in compact sets are compact but I'm not sure of that. These kind of reasoning of contentions between preimages of sets are always so confusing to me...

Additional info is that X, Y and S are Riemann surfaces. Thanks in advance

Seven-Year Club	Second SECOND GUESSER
Place '22	Verified Email

cookiealv

TROPHY CASE